Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication

Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician... Support Care Cancer (2018) 26:41–60 DOI 10.1007/s00520-017-3865-7 REVIEW ARTICLE Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication 1 1 2 1,3 L. Y. Yang & D. S. Manhas & A. F. Howard & R. A. Olson Received: 28 March 2017 /Accepted: 21 August 2017 /Published online: 28 August 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract administration and completion, compliance issues due to lack Purpose Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an increasing- of incentive or forgetfulness, and use of PROs that do not ly popular tool to optimize care and bridge the gap between appropriately assess issues relevant to the patient. patient experience and clinician understanding. The aim of Facilitators include increased education on PRO use, using this review was to identify mechanisms through which PRO tools that patients find more acceptable, and providing PROs facilitate patient-clinician communication in the adult patient data summaries in an easily accessible format for oncology population. clinicians. Methods We conducted a systematic review of the published Conclusions Our review suggests that PROs facilitate patient- literature using the following data sources: MEDLINE, clinician communication through various mechanisms that EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cab Direct, and CDSR. could perhaps contribute to improvements in http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Supportive Care in Cancer Springer Journals

Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication

Supportive Care in Cancer , Volume 26 (1) – Aug 28, 2017

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/patient-reported-outcome-use-in-oncology-a-systematic-review-of-the-R0Y7kZ1bwe

References (69)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Oncology; Nursing; Nursing Research; Pain Medicine; Rehabilitation Medicine
ISSN
0941-4355
eISSN
1433-7339
DOI
10.1007/s00520-017-3865-7
pmid
28849277
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Support Care Cancer (2018) 26:41–60 DOI 10.1007/s00520-017-3865-7 REVIEW ARTICLE Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication 1 1 2 1,3 L. Y. Yang & D. S. Manhas & A. F. Howard & R. A. Olson Received: 28 March 2017 /Accepted: 21 August 2017 /Published online: 28 August 2017 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany 2017 Abstract administration and completion, compliance issues due to lack Purpose Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an increasing- of incentive or forgetfulness, and use of PROs that do not ly popular tool to optimize care and bridge the gap between appropriately assess issues relevant to the patient. patient experience and clinician understanding. The aim of Facilitators include increased education on PRO use, using this review was to identify mechanisms through which PRO tools that patients find more acceptable, and providing PROs facilitate patient-clinician communication in the adult patient data summaries in an easily accessible format for oncology population. clinicians. Methods We conducted a systematic review of the published Conclusions Our review suggests that PROs facilitate patient- literature using the following data sources: MEDLINE, clinician communication through various mechanisms that EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cab Direct, and CDSR. could perhaps contribute to improvements in

Journal

Supportive Care in CancerSpringer Journals

Published: Aug 28, 2017

There are no references for this article.