Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R Jebbouj, B Yousfi (2010)
An integrated multivariate approach to net blotch of barley: Virulence quantification, pathotyping and a breeding strategy for disease resistanceEur J Plant Pathol, 127
M Cromey, R Parkes (2003)
Pathogenic variation in Drechslera teres in New ZealandN Z Plant Prot, 56
RA Shjerve, JD Faris, RS Brueggeman, C Yan, Y Zhu, V Koladia, TL Friesen (2014)
Evaluation of a Pyrenophora teres f. teres mapping population reveals multiple independent interactions with a region of barley chromosome 6HFungal Genet Biol, 70
J Robinson, M Jalli (1997)
Quantitative resistance to Pyrenophora teres in six Nordic spring barley accessionsEuphytica, 94
J Robinson, M Jalli (1996)
Diversity among Finnish net blotch isolates and resistance in barleyEuphytica, 92
OS Afanasenko, M Jalli, HO Pinnschmidt, O Filatova, G Platz (2009)
Development of an international standard set of barley differential genotypes for Pyrenophora teres f. teresPlant Pathol, 58
JM Tuohy, M Jalli, BM Cooke, E O’Sullivan (2006)
Pathogenic variation in populations of Drechslera teres f. teres and D. teres f. maculata and differences in host cultivar responsesEur J Plant Pathol, 116
JB Speakman, EH Pommer (1986)
A simple method for producing large volumes of Pyrenophora teres spore suspensionBull Br Mycol Soc, 20
K Richter, J Schondelmaier, C Jung (1998)
Mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting Drechslera teres resistance in barley with molecular markersTheor Appl Genet, 97
H Deimel, G Hoffmann (1991)
Detrimental effects of net blotch disease to barley plants caused by Drechslera teres (Sacc.) ShoemakerZeitschrift fuer Pflanzenkrankheiten und Pflanzenschutz, 98
A Douiyssi, D Rasmusson, A Roelfs (1998)
Responses of barley cultivars and lines to isolates of Pyrenophora teresPlant Dis, 82
L Lamari, CC Bernier (1989)
Toxin of Pyrenophora tritici-repentis: host-specificity, significance in disease, and inheritance of host reactionPhytopathology, 79
OC Yoder, VE Gracen (1975)
Segregation of pathogenicity types and host-specific toxin production in progenies of crosses between races T and O of Helminthosporium maydis (Cochliobolus heterostrophus)Phytopathology, 65
TN Khan, WJR Boyd (1969)
Physiologic specialization in Drechslera teresAust J Biol Sci, 22
JC Zadoks, TT Chang, CF Konzak (1974)
A decimal code for the growth stages of cerealsWeed Res, 14
JC Sutton, P Steele (1983)
Effects of seed and foliar fungicides on progress of net blotch and yield in barleyCan J Plant Sci, 63
V Smedegård-Petersen (1977)
Isolation of two toxins produced by Pyrenophora teres and their significance in disease development of net-spot blotch of barleyPhysiol Plant Pathol, 10
A Tekauz (1985)
A numerical scale to classify reactions of barley to Pyrenophora teresCan J Plant Pathol, 7
M Cakir, S Gupta, GJ Platz, GA Ablett, R Loughman, LC Emebiri, D Poulsen, CD Li, RC Lance, NW Galwey, MG Jones (2003)
Mapping and validation of the genes for resistance to Pyrenophora teres f. teres in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)Crop Pasture Sci, 54
A Tekauz, JT Mills (1974)
New types of virulence in Pyrenophora teres in CanadaCan J Plant Sci, 54
L Piening, ML Kaufmann (1969)
Comparison of the effects of net blotch and leaf removal on yield in barleyCan J Plant Sci, 49
V Smedegård-Petersen (1974)
Reduction in yield and grain size of barley due to attack by the net blotch fungus Pyrenophora teresR Vet Agric Univ Copenhagen, Den, Yearb, 1974
GM Murray, JP Brennan (2010)
Estimating disease losses to the Australian barley industryAustralas Plant Pathol, 39
TN Khan (1987)
Relationship between net blotch (Drechslera teres) and losses in grain yield of barley in Western AustraliaCrop Pasture Sci, 38
TL Friesen, SW Meinhardt, JD Faris (2007)
The Stagonospora nodorum-wheat pathosystem involves multiple proteinaceous host-selective toxins and corresponding host sensitivity genes that interact in an inverse gene-for-gene mannerPlant J, 51
A Smith, B Cullis, R Thompson (2001)
Analyzing variety by environment data using multiplicative mixed models and adjustments for spatial field trendBiometrics, 57
MA Qamar, ZH Liu, JD Faris, S Chao, MC Edwards, Z Lai, JD Franckowiak, TL Friesen (2008)
A region of barley chromosome 6H harbors multiple major genes associated with net type net blotch resistanceTheor Appl Genet, 117
Z Liu, SR Ellwood, RP Oliver, TL Friesen (2011)
Pyrenophora teres profile of an increasingly damaging barley pathogenMol Plant Pathol, 12
MIE Arabi, B Al-Safadi, T Charbaji (2003)
Pathogenic variation among isolates of Pyrenophora teres, the causal agent of barley net blotchJ Phytopathol, 151
T Friesen, J Faris, Z Lai, B Steffenson (2006)
Identification and chromosomal location of major genes for resistance to Pyrenophora teres in a doubled-haploid barley populationGenome, 49
GJ Platz, KL Bell, RG Rees, VJ Galea (2000)
8th International Barley Genetics Symposium, 2000
BJ Steffenson, PM Hayes, A Kleinhofs (1996)
Genetics of seedling and adult plant resistance to net blotch (Pyrenophora teres f. teres) and spot blotch (Cochliobolus sativus) in barleyTheor Appl Genet, 92
JH Ward (1963)
Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective functionJ Am Stat Assoc, 58
AB Smith, P Lim, BR Cullis (2006)
The design and analysis of multi-phase plant breeding experimentsJ Agric Sci, 144
M Cakir, S Gupta, C Li, M Hayden, DE Mather, GA Ablett, GJ Platz, S Broughton, KJ Chalmers, R Loughman, MG Jones (2011)
Genetic mapping and QTL analysis of disease resistance traits in the barley population Baudin × AC MetcalfeCrop Pasture Sci, 62
RA Shoemaker (1962)
Drechslera ItoCan J Bot, 40
S Gupta, R Loughman (2001)
Current virulence of Pyrenophora teres on barley in Western AustraliaPlant Dis, 85
JJ Weiland, BJ Steffenson, RD Cartwright, RK Webster (1999)
Identification of molecular genetic markers in Pyrenophora teres f. teres associated with low virulence on ‘Harbin’ barleyPhytopathology, 89
F Mendiburu (2014)
Agricolae: statistical procedures for agricultural researchR Packag Version, 1
A Lehmensiek, GJ Platz, E Mace, D Poulsen, MW Sutherland (2008)
Mapping of adult plant resistance to net form of net blotch in three Australian barley populationsCrop Pasture Sci, 58
BJ Steffenson, RK Webster, LF Jackson (1991)
Reduction in yield loss using incomplete resistance to Pyrenophora teres f. teres in barleyPlant Dis, 75
VWL Jordan (1981)
Aetiology of barley net blotch caused by Pyrenophora teres and some effects on yieldPlant Pathol, 30
A Bouajila, N Zoghlami, M Al Ahmed, M Baum, A Ghorbel, K Nazari (2011)
Comparative virulence of Pyrenophora teres f. teres from Syria and Tunisia and screening for resistance sources in barley: implications for breedingLett Appl Microbiol, 53
H Raman, GJ Platz, KJ Chalmers, R Raman, BJ Read, AR Barr, DB Moody (2003)
Mapping of genomic regions associated with net form of netblotch resistance in barleyCrop Pasture Sci, 54
BJ Steffenson, RK Webster (1992)
Pathotype diversity of Pyrenophora teres f. teres on barleyPhytopathology, 82
R Jebbouj, B Yousfi (2009)
Barley yield losses due to defoliation of upper three leaves either healthy or infected at boot stage by Pyrenophora teres f. teresEur J Plant Pathol, 125
BJ Steffenson, RK Webster (1992)
Quantitative resistance to Pyrenophora teres f. teres in barleyPhytopathology, 82
TN Khan (1982)
Changes in pathogenicity of Drechslera teres relating to changes in barley cultivars grown in Western AustraliaPlant Dis, 66
AD Beattie, GJ Scoles, BG Rossnagel (2007)
Identification of molecular markers linked to a Pyrenophora teres avirulence genePhytopathology, 97
ZH Liu, S Zhong, AK Stasko, MC Edwards, TL Friesen (2012)
Virulence profile and genetic structure of a North Dakota population of Pyrenophora teres f. teres, the causal agent of net form net blotch of barleyPhytopathology, 102
DJ Somers, OM Manninen, M Jalli, R Kalendar, A Schulman, O Afanasenko, J Robinson (2006)
Mapping of major spot-type and net-type net-blotch resistance genes in the Ethiopian barley line CI 9819Genome, 49
A Tekauz (1990)
Characterization and distribution of pathogenic variation in Pyrenophora teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata from western CanadaCan J Plant Pathol, 12
R Jonsson, T Bryngelsson, M Jalli, M Gustafsson (1998)
Effect of growth stage on resistance to Drechslera teres f. teres in barleyJ Phytopathol, 146
Pyrenophora teres f. teres (Ptt) is the causal agent of net form of net blotch (NFNB) – a major foliar disease of barley (Hordeum vulgare) crops worldwide. Deployment of genetic resistance in cultivars is the preferred method of control, but requires knowledge of the pathogenic variation of Ptt to be effective as spatial and temporal variation is common. In this study, 123 Ptt isolates collected from five states across Australia were examined for pathogenic variation using a set of 31 barley genotypes, composed of 11 international genotypes and 20 Australian cultivars. Barley seedlings were inoculated with spore suspensions from monoconidial isolate cultures and scored for infection response. Phenotypes were used to perform hierarchical cluster analysis for barley genotypes and Ptt isolates. Cluster analysis identified seven line groups, each containing barley genotypes that displayed similar responses to the Ptt isolates. Isolates clustered into four distinct isolate groups shown to harbour differential virulence to four key genotypes: Maritime, Prior, Skiff and Tallon. Isolates with virulence to any one of these genotypes accounted for 96.7% of the samples. Differential virulence was observed on a range of genotypes within each isolate group. The composition of isolate groups in eastern Australia was distinct from Western Australia, whereas all isolate groups were detected in southern Australia. Results suggest that cultivation of regionally adapted barley cultivars has led to regional evolution of Ptt, where the pathogen acquires virulence specific for resistance factors deployed in local cultivars. Detection of Ptt modern isolates that were highly virulent to historic cultivars indicates the long-term survival of virulence gene combinations in the pathogen population.
Australasian Plant Pathology – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 17, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.