Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2009)
Science for scienceScience, 324
(NCI Fact Book (2011) National Cancer Institute)
NCI Fact Book (2011) National Cancer InstituteNCI Fact Book (2011) National Cancer Institute, NCI Fact Book (2011) National Cancer Institute
(Physician Specialty Data (2008) Association of American Medical Colleges)
Physician Specialty Data (2008) Association of American Medical CollegesPhysician Specialty Data (2008) Association of American Medical Colleges, Physician Specialty Data (2008) Association of American Medical Colleges
(National Institutes of Health Individual Mentored Career Development Awards Program (2011))
National Institutes of Health Individual Mentored Career Development Awards Program (2011)National Institutes of Health Individual Mentored Career Development Awards Program (2011), National Institutes of Health Individual Mentored Career Development Awards Program (2011)
(Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT) (2011) NIH new investigators: number of investigators and age at first award)
Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT) (2011) NIH new investigators: number of investigators and age at first awardResearch Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT) (2011) NIH new investigators: number of investigators and age at first award, Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT) (2011) NIH new investigators: number of investigators and age at first award
(National Science Foundation (2012) Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011)
National Science Foundation (2012) Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011National Science Foundation (2012) Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011, National Science Foundation (2012) Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011
(2008)
The Burroughs Wellcome Career Award in the biomedical sciences: challenges to and prospects for estimating the causal effects of career development programsEval Health Prof, 31
(2011)
Sex differences in application, success, and funding rates for NIH extramural programsAcad Med, 86
PH Rossi, MW Lipsey, HE Freeman (2004)
Evaluation: a systematic approach
(2010)
Sex differences in career development awardees’ subsequent grant attainmentAnn Intern Med, 152
(2005)
The physician-scientist career pipeline in 2005: build it, and they will comeJAMA, 294
(2005)
Advancing the nation’s health needs: NIH research training programs
(2003)
Bridging postdoctoral training and a faculty position: initial outcomes of the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Awards in the Biomedical SciencesAcad Med, 78
(Survey of Earned Doctorates (2010))
Survey of Earned Doctorates (2010)Survey of Earned Doctorates (2010), Survey of Earned Doctorates (2010)
(2007)
Falling off the academic bandwagon. Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transitionEMBO Rep, 8
(2009)
Ensuring quality cancer care through the oncology workforce
(Pathways Through Graduate School and Into Careers (2012) Council of Graduate Schools)
Pathways Through Graduate School and Into Careers (2012) Council of Graduate SchoolsPathways Through Graduate School and Into Careers (2012) Council of Graduate Schools, Pathways Through Graduate School and Into Careers (2012) Council of Graduate Schools
(Biomedical Research Workforce Working Group Report (2012) National Institutes of Health)
Biomedical Research Workforce Working Group Report (2012) National Institutes of HealthBiomedical Research Workforce Working Group Report (2012) National Institutes of Health, Biomedical Research Workforce Working Group Report (2012) National Institutes of Health
The National Cancer Institute (NCI) career development (K) awards program supports investigators to develop their cancer research programs and achieve independence. The NCI Center for Cancer Training conducted a K program evaluation by analyzing outcomes of awardees and individuals who applied to the program but were not funded. The evaluation covered seven NCI mechanisms (K01, K07, K08, K11, K22, K23, and K25) between 1980 and 2008. Descriptive statistics and regression modeling were performed on the full cohort (n = 2,893 individuals, 4,081 K applications) and a comparison cohort described herein. K awardees proportionately received more subsequent NIH grants and authored more publications, and time to first R01 grant was unaffected. Of those not pursuing research, K awardees were more likely to participate in activities signaling continued scientific engagement. The NCI K program had a positive impact, not only on participants’ biomedical research careers but also on achieving outcomes significant to the scientific enterprise.
Journal of Cancer Education – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 5, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.