Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P. Bank, D. Baum (2004)
Hedging and portfolio optimization in financial markets with a large traderMath. Finance, 14
U. Cetin, M. Soner, N. Touzi (2010)
Option hedging for small investors under liquidity costsFinance Stoch., 14
U. Cetin, R. Jarrow, P. Protter, M. Warachka (2006)
Pricing options in an extended Black Scholes economy with illiquidity: theory and empirical evidenceRev. Financ. Stud., 19
R. Korn (1998)
Portfolio optimisation with strictly positive transaction costs and impulse controlFinance Stoch., 2
V. Ly Vath, M. Mnif, H. Pham (2007)
A model of optimal portfolio selection under liquidity risk and price impactFinance Stoch., 11
N. El Karoui, C. Kapoudjian, E. Pardoux, S. Peng, M.C. Quenez (1997)
Reflected solutions of backward SDE’s, and related obstacle problems for PDE’sAnn. Probab., 25
D. Wagner (1977)
Survey of measurable selection theoremsSIAM J. Control Optim., 15
U. Cetin, L.C.G. Rogers (2007)
Modeling liquidity effects in discrete timeMath. Finance, 17
J.P. Bouchaud, D. Farmer, F. Lillo (2009)
How Markets Slowly Digest Changes in Supply and Demand
U. Cetin, R. Jarrow, P. Protter (2004)
Liquidity risk and arbitrage pricing theoryFinance Stoch., 8
J. Cvitanic, H. Pham, N. Touzi (1999)
A closed-form solution to the problem of super-replication under transaction costsFinance Stoch., 3
J. Eastham, K. Hastings (1988)
Optimal impulse control of portfoliosMath. Oper. Res., 13
S.E. Shreve, H.M. Soner (1994)
Optimal investment and consumption with transaction costsAnn. Appl. Probab., 4
B. Oksendal, A. Sulem (2002)
Optimal consumption and portfolio with both fixed and proportional transaction costsSIAM J. Control Optim., 40
I. Karatzas, S.E. Shreve (1998)
Methods of Mathematical Finance
In this paper we study an optimal portfolio selection problem under instantaneous price impact. Based on some empirical analysis in the literature, we model such impact as a concave function of the trading size when the trading size is small. The price impact can be thought of as either a liquidity cost or a transaction cost, but the concavity nature of the cost leads to some fundamental difference from those in the existing literature. We show that the problem can be reduced to an impulse control problem, but without fixed cost, and that the value function is a viscosity solution to a special type of Quasi-Variational Inequality (QVI). We also prove directly (without using the solution to the QVI) that the optimal strategy exists and more importantly, despite the absence of a fixed cost, it is still in a “piecewise constant” form, reflecting a more practical perspective.
Applied Mathematics and Optimization – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.