Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
marco.moraschini2@unibo.it Fakultät für Mathematik, A well-known question by Gromov asks whether the vanishing of the simplicial volume Universität Regensburg, of oriented closed aspherical manifolds implies the vanishing of the Euler characteristic. Regensburg, Germany Full list of author information is We study various versions of Gromov’s question and collect strategies towards available at the end of the article aﬃrmative answers and strategies towards negative answers to this problem. This work was supported by the Moreover, we put Gromov’s question into context with other open problems in low- CRC 1085 Higher Invariants (Universität Regensburg, funded and high-dimensional topology. A special emphasis is put on a comparative analysis of by the DFG) the additivity properties of the simplicial volume and the Euler characteristic for manifolds with boundary. We explain that the simplicial volume deﬁnes a symmetric monoidal functor (TQFT) on the amenable cobordism category, but not on the whole cobordism category. In addition, using known computations of simplicial volumes, we conclude that the fundamental group of the four-dimensional amenable cobordism category is not ﬁnitely generated. We also consider new variations of Gromov’s question. Speciﬁcally, we show that counterexamples exist among aspherical spaces that are only homology equivalent to oriented closed connected manifolds. 1 Introduction The simplicial volume M is a homotopy invariant of oriented compact manifolds M, deﬁned as the -semi-norm of the singular R-fundamental class. The simplicial volume is proportional to the Riemannian volume for hyperbolic manifolds and zero in the pres- ence of amenability. By the Gauß–Bonnet theorem and Følner covering towers, a similar behaviour is also exhibited by the Euler characteristic of aspherical manifolds. But under- standing the connection between the vanishing behaviour of the simplicial volume and the Euler characteristic of closed aspherical manifolds remains a mystery. In particular, the following problem by Gromov is wide open: Question 1.1 [53, p. 232] Let M be an oriented closed aspherical manifold. Does the following implication hold? M= 0 =⇒ χ(M) = 0. (SVχ) © The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. 0123456789().,–: volV 44 Page 2 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 The main challenge in answering Question 1.1 is to ﬁnd a common ground for the vari- ous conditions and invariants involved: asphericity, being a closed manifold, the vanishing of the simplicial volume, and the vanishing of the Euler characteristic. In this article, we explore diﬀerent approaches to Question 1.1, in search of both positive and negative examples, as well as study its connections with other open problems in low- and high-dimensional topology. On the one hand, a key direction pursued in this paper is the comparative study of the additivity properties of the simplicial volume and of the Euler characteristic, which naturally leads us to look at the simplicial volume (and stable integral simplicial volume) of compact manifolds with boundary (see also Sect. 1.1 below). On the other hand, a diﬀerent direction considered in this paper is based on the obser- vation that if the answer to Question 1.1 is aﬃrmative, then Property (SVχ)willhold for a general class of oriented closed manifolds which are only homology equivalent to an aspherical one (see Remark 5.1). Based on this, we consider generalized versions of Question 1.1 for aspherical spaces which are only homology equivalent to an oriented closed manifold and for oriented closed manifolds which are only homology equivalent to an aspherical space (see also Sect. 1.2 below). A quick summary of various other strategies and examples is provided in Sect. 1.3. 1.1 Additivity As the category of closed aspherical manifolds is diﬃcult to handle structurally, we extend the setup to compact aspherical manifolds with π -injective boundary (Sect. 2.3)and consider an (equivalent) version of Gromov’s question in this context. Question (see Question 2.13)Let (M, ∂M) be an oriented compact aspherical manifold with non-empty π -injective aspherical boundary. Does the following implication hold? M, ∂M= 0 =⇒ χ(M, ∂M) = 0. (SVχ, ∂) We recall some examples and suﬃcient conditions for the vanishing of the simplicial volume in Sect. 3. Moreover, we show an extension of Gromov’s vanishing theorem (The- orem 3.5) to the vanishing of the relative simplicial volume M, ∂M for oriented compact connected manifolds (M, ∂M) which admit open covers with certain amenability proper- ties (Theorem 3.13). Also, in Sect. 6, we discuss the properties of the relative stable integral simplicial volume and the analogues of the above questions for this invariant. The extension to manifolds with boundary generally allows us to compare additivity and ﬁlling properties of the simplicial volume and of the Euler characteristic more sys- tematically. For example, we show that Question 1.1 is related to Edmonds’ problem (Conjecture 3.30) as follows: Proposition 1 (see Proposition 3.31) Suppose that the following hold: (a) Every oriented closed aspherical 3-manifold with amenable fundamental group is the π -injective boundary of an oriented compact aspherical 4-manifold W with W, ∂W= 0. (b) All oriented closed aspherical 4-manifolds satisfy Property (SVχ). Then, there exists an oriented closed aspherical 4-manifold M with χ(M) = 1. Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 3 of 36 44 The notion of a topological quantum ﬁeld theory (TQFT), as a symmetric monoidal func- tor on the cobordism category, provides an eﬃcient way of encoding additivity properties. The connections between the simplicial volume and (invertible) TQFTs are discussed in Sect. 4. Speciﬁcally, based on known additivity properties, we explain in Sect. 4.2 that the simplicial volume deﬁnes an invertible TQFT on a suitable amenable cobordism category with values in R. In addition, we show that this functor cannot be extended to a functor on the whole cobordism category (Proposition 4.7). This contrasts the additivity behaviour of the relative Euler characteristic, which is unconditional and thus deﬁnes a TQFT on the whole cobordism category (Remark 4.9). We also obtain the following result about the fundamental group of the amenable cobordism category of 4-manifolds and related cobordism categories (see Sect. 4.2 for the precise deﬁnition of Cob ): Theorem 1 (see Theorem 4.5) Let G be a class of amenable groups that is closed under G G isomorphisms and let M be an object of Cob . Then the group π (B Cob , [M]) is not 4 4 ﬁnitely generated. 1.2 Aspherical spaces homology equivalent to closed manifolds Using the Kan–Thurston theorem, we show in Sect. 5 that Property (SVχ)fails in general if closed aspherical manifolds are replaced by aspherical spaces homology equivalent to closed manifolds or closed manifolds homology equivalent to an aspherical space (see Sect. 5.2 for the deﬁnition of an acyclic map): Theorem 2 (see Theorem 5.7) Let n ∈ N be even. ≥2 (1) There exist aspherical spaces X that admit an acyclic map X → M to an oriented closed connected n-manifold M and satisfy X= 0 and χ(X) = 0. In particular, these aspherical spaces do not satisfy Property (SVχ). (2) There exist oriented closed connected n-manifolds M that admit an acyclic map X → M from an aspherical space X and satisfy M= 0 and χ(M) = 0.In particular, these manifolds do not satisfy Property (SVχ). 1.3 Strategies and known examples As the following examples show, the hypotheses in Question 1.1 cannot be reasonably weakened or modiﬁed in any straightforward way: • In general, non-aspherical oriented closed connected manifolds do not satisfy Prop- 2 2 erty (SVχ): For example, S = 0, but χ(S ) = 2. • The converse implication of Property (SVχ) does not hold in general for aspheri- cal manifolds: For example, oriented closed connected hyperbolic 3-manifolds have vanishing Euler’s characteristic, but their simplicial volume is nonzero. • In general, Property (SVχ) does not hold for oriented compact connected manifolds with non-empty boundary without imposing additional conditions on the inclusion of the boundary (Remark 2.16). • In general, Property (SVχ) does not hold for aspherical spaces that are only homology equivalent to oriented closed connected manifolds (Theorem 5.7). We also refer to Sect. 3 for a survey of examples of oriented closed manifolds with vanishing or non-vanishing simplicial volume. 44 Page 4 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Various strategies have been developed to handle Question 1.1. In particular, this also led to a wide range of positive examples: Direct computations of both sides One of Gromov’s original motivations to formulate Question 1.1 was the observation that the simplicial volume and the Euler characteristic share some common vanishing properties. Examples of this phenomenon include manifolds that admit non-trivial self- coverings, closed aspherical manifolds with amenable fundamental group, and closed aspherical manifolds that admit small amenable open covers (Sect. 3). Boundedness properties of the Euler class The simplicial volume of an oriented closed connected n-manifold M is closely related to the comparison map from bounded cohomology to singular cohomology in degree n (see Sect. 2.4 and Proposition 2.18). On the other hand, the Euler characteristic is related to the Euler class by duality. As we explain in Proposition 2.22, an immediate consequence is that Property (SVχ) can be reformulated in terms of the boundedness of the Euler class. The problem of the boundedness of the Euler class is well studied and understood in several cases [17,63,84,103]. L -Betti numbers Gromov suggested to use the fact that the Euler characteristic can be computed as the alternating sum of the L -Betti numbers and asked the following version of Question 1.1: Question 1.2 [53, p. 232] Let M be an oriented closed aspherical manifold. Does the following implication hold? (2) M= 0 =⇒ ∀ b (M) = 0 . (SVL ) k∈N Assuming the Singer conjecture on the vanishing of the L -Betti numbers of closed aspherical manifolds outside the middle dimension [35], Question 1.1 and Question 1.2 are equivalent. More concretely, Gromov [54, p. 306] proposed a deﬁnition of integral foliated simplicial volume, involving dynamical systems, and then • to establish an upper bound of the L -Betti numbers in terms of integral foliated simplicial volume (via Poincaré duality), and • to investigate whether the vanishing of the simplicial volume of closed aspherical manifolds implies the vanishing of integral foliated simplicial volume. The ﬁrst step has been carried out by Schmidt [98]. The second step is an open problem, which is known to have a positive answer in many cases, e.g. for oriented closed aspherical manifolds • that have amenable fundamental group [46], • that carry a non-trivial smooth S -action [39], • that are generalized graph manifolds [40], • that are smooth and have trivial minimal volume [11, (proof of) Corollary 5.4]. In particular, Question 1.1 with the simplicial volume replaced by the minimal volume has a positive answer [97]. Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 5 of 36 44 Moreover, the integral foliated simplicial volume is related to the cost of the fundamental group [73] and to the stable integral simplicial volume [46,78] (Sect. 6). In turn, the stable integral simplicial volume gives upper bounds for homology growth, torsion homology growth [46], and the rank gradient [72]. Functorial semi-norms If the integral foliated simplicial volume is a functorial semi-norm on aspherical closed manifolds, then Question 1.1 has an aﬃrmative answer [38, Theorem 2.2.2]. Geometric positivity results Conversely, it is known that many examples of closed aspherical manifolds with potentially nonzero Euler characteristic have positive simplicial volume. Examples include oriented closed connected hyperbolic manifolds [51,101], closed manifolds with negative sectional curvature [59], closed irreducible locally symmetric spaces of higher rank [69], closed man- ifolds with non-positive sectional curvature and suﬃciently negative intermediate Ricci curvature [25], and closed manifolds with non-positive sectional curvature and strong enough conditions at a single point [26]. We refer to Sect. 3.1 for further examples of manifolds with (non-)vanishing simplicial volume. Outlook Supported by the wealth of positive examples, and in view of the existence of “exotic” aspherical manifolds, it seems plausible that Question 1.1 has a positive answer in the following special case: Question 1.3 Let M be an oriented closed aspherical n-manifold whose universal cover- ing is homeomorphic to R .Does M satisfy Property (SVχ)? Organization of the article In Sect. 2, we collect the deﬁnitions of simplicial volume (Sect. 2.1) and bounded cohomol- ogy (Sect. 2.4) as well as the duality principle which connects these (Sect. 2.4). Moreover, we discuss the behaviour of the simplicial volume with respect to glueings (Sect. 2.2)and introduce a relative version of Question 1.1 (Sect. 2.3). Finally, in Sect. 2.5, we discuss the boundedness properties of the Euler class in connection with Question 1.1. Section 3 is mainly devoted to the vanishing of the simplicial volume. Some known examples are collected in Sect. 3.1. Vanishing results for the simplicial volume assuming the existence of amenable open covers are recalled in Sect. 3.2 and extended to manifolds with boundary in Sect. 3.3. Known results and open problems about the behaviour of the simplicial volume with respect to products are recalled in Sect. 3.4 and these are then discussed in connection with Question 1.1 (Proposition 3.24). Finally, Sect. 3.5 explains a connection between Question 1.1 and a conjecture of Edmonds in four-dimensional topology (Conjecture 3.30) via “ﬁllings” of closed manifolds. In Sect. 4, we deﬁne the amenable cobordism category and explain how to interpret the simplicial volume as an invertible TQFT on this cobordism category. Using the simplicial volume, we prove that the fundamental group of the four-dimensional amenable cobor- dism category is not ﬁnitely generated (Theorem 4.5). Also, using known results about 44 Page 6 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 cobordism categories, we show that the simplicial volume does not extend to the whole cobordism category (Proposition 4.7). Section 5 is concerned with the study of Question 1.1 using known constructions that produce aspherical spaces. More precisely, in Sects. 5.1–5.3, we recall the Kan–Thurston theorem and explain how to use this to prove the result stated in Sect. 1.2 (see Theo- rem 5.7). Then, in Sect. 5.4, we brieﬂy review known constructions of closed aspherical manifolds, Davis’ reﬂection group trick and Gromov’s hyperbolization, in the context of Question 1.1. Finally, Sect. 6 surveys the approach to Question 1.1 via the stable integral simplicial volume. Notation We use N ={0, 1, 2, ...}. We recall that aspherical spaces are assumed to be path- connected. 2 Simplicial volume We recall the deﬁnition of the simplicial volume, basic glueing properties, and the role of the comparison map for bounded cohomology. Moreover, we consider and study a relative version of Question 1.1, and discuss the connection of Question 1.1 with (the boundedness of) the Euler class. 2.1 Simplicial volume The simplicial volume originally appeared in Gromov’s proof of Mostow rigidity as a homotopy invariant replacement of the hyperbolic volume [51,90]. Deﬁnition 2.1 (Simplicial volume)Let M be an oriented closed connected n-manifold. The simplicial volume of M is deﬁned as M :=[M] ∈ R , 1 ≥0 where [M] ∈ H (M; R)isthe R-fundamental class of M and · denotes the semi-norm n 1 on H ( · ; R), induced by the -norm on the singular chain complex C ( · ; R) with respect ∗ ∗ to the basis given by the singular simplices. Deﬁnition 2.2 (Relative simplicial volume)Let (M, ∂M) be an oriented compact con- nected n-manifold M with boundary ∂M.The relative simplicial volume of (M, ∂M)is deﬁned as M, ∂M :=[M, ∂M] ∈ R , 1 ≥0 where [M, ∂M] ∈ H (M, ∂M; R)isthe R-fundamental class of (M, ∂M)and · denotes n 1 the -semi-norm on relative singular homology. In the oriented, compact, non-connected case, we deﬁne the (relative) simplicial volume as the sum of the (relative) simplicial volumes of the components. In particular, ∅= 0. Remark 2.3 The boundary of a relative fundamental cycle of (M, ∂M) is a fundamental cycle of ∂M. This shows that for every oriented compact connected n-manifold M with Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 7 of 36 44 non-empty boundary ∂M,wehave ∂M M, ∂M≥ . n + 1 In particular, M, ∂M= 0implies ∂M= 0. Note that in the case of compact 3-manifolds better estimates are available [15]. Remark 2.4 One can also deﬁne the (relative) simplicial volume with integral coeﬃcients just by working with integral singular homology. More precisely, the integral (relative) simplicial volume of an oriented compact connected n-manifold M with (possibly empty) boundary ∂M is deﬁned by M, ∂M :=[M, ∂M] ∈ N, Z Z 1 where [M, ∂M] ∈ H (M, ∂M; Z)isthe Z-fundamental class of (M, ∂M). Notice that we Z n still have M, ∂M ≥∂M /(n + 1). Z Z 2.2 Simplicial volume and glueings of manifolds In general, the simplicial volume is not additive with respect to the glueing of manifolds along submanifolds. However, (sub)additivity does hold in the case of amenable glueings: Theorem 2.5 (Simplicial volume and glueings [13,51], [45, Theorem 7.6]) Let I be a ﬁnite set and let (M , ∂M ) be a family of oriented compact connected manifolds of the i i i∈I same dimension. Assume that all the boundary components have amenable fundamental group. Moreover, let (M, ∂M) be obtained from (M , ∂M ) by a pairwise glueing (along i i i∈I orientation reversing homeomorphisms) of a set of boundary components. Then, we have M, ∂M≤ M , ∂M . i i i∈I If all glued boundary components are π -injective in their original manifold, then M, ∂M= M , ∂M . i i i∈I Remark 2.6 Theorem 2.5 allows that boundary components of the manifolds (M , ∂M ) i i are glued to boundary components of the same manifold (M , ∂M ); i.e. self-glueings are i i included. Furthermore, not all boundary components need to be glued (so that some of the components remain boundary components of M). Remark 2.7 It is well-known that the Euler characteristic is always additive with respect to glueings: given oriented compact connected n-manifolds (M, ∂M)and (N, ∂N)with homeomorphic (or just homotopy equivalent) boundary components M ⊆ ∂M and N ⊆ 1 1 ∂N,weset Z = M ∪ ∼ N. Then we have: M N 1 1 χ(Z) = χ(M) + χ(N) − χ(M N ) 1 = 1 and similarly: χ(Z, ∂Z) = χ(M, ∂M) + χ(N, ∂N) + χ(M N ). 1 1 Here χ(W, ∂W):= χ(W )−χ(∂W ) denotes the relative Euler characteristic of the compact manifold (W, ∂W ). 44 Page 8 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Assuming that M is aspherical and has amenable fundamental group, then both the simplicial volume and the Euler characteristic of M vanish (Example 3.2(1) and Theo- rem 3.6). In particular, the last formula simpliﬁes in this case to a formula analogous to the one in Theorem 2.5: χ(Z, ∂Z) = χ(M, ∂M) + χ(N, ∂N). Example 2.8 (Doubles) Given an oriented compact connected manifold M with non- empty boundary ∂M, we deﬁne the double of M to be D(M):= M ∪ ∼ −M, ∂M ∂(−M) where −M denotes a copy of M with the opposite orientation. It is easily seen that we always have subadditivity of the simplicial volume in this case: D(M)≤ 2 ·M, ∂M. Indeed, given a relative fundamental cycle c of M,wecan set c to be the relative funda- mental cycle of −M corresponding to −c.Then, c = c + c is in fact a fundamental cycle of D(M)withnorm |c | ≤|c| +|c| = 2 ·|c| . 1 1 1 1 Then the subadditivity of the simplicial volume follows from taking the inﬁmum over all such c. The same computation also works for integral coeﬃcients. Remark 2.9 (Doubles and asphericity) In general, the double of an oriented compact aspherical manifold with boundary is not necessarily aspherical; prototypical examples of 1 2 this kind are the 3-ball or S × D . Let (M, ∂M) be a compact n-manifold, where M is aspherical and ∂M is connected, and let F denote the homotopy ﬁbre of the inclusion ∂M ⊂ M. For simplicity, we write H := π (∂M, x)and G := π (M, x) and denote by ι: H → G the induced homomorphism. 1 1 Moreover, let G := im(ι)bethe imageof ι, and consider the corresponding diagram K (G, 1) ∂M K (G, 1) K (G, 1) K (G , 1) K (G, 1) induced by ι and the inclusion maps. Suppose that the (homotopy) pushout D(M) = M ∪ M K (G, 1) ∪ K (G, 1) ∂M ∂M is aspherical. Then the induced map between the homotopy pushouts h h g : K (G, 1) ∪ K (G, 1) → K (G, 1) ∪ K (G, 1) ∂M K (G ,1) is a homotopy equivalence by the Seifert–van Kampen theorem. Passing to the homotopy ﬁbres of the diagram above, regarded as a diagram over K (G, 1), we obtain the following Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 9 of 36 44 diagram (up to canonical homotopy equivalence) ∗ F ∗ ∗ D ∗ where D is discrete with cardinality equal to the index [G : G ]. We recall that the homo- topy ﬁbre of a map from a homotopy pushout is canonically identiﬁed up to homotopy equivalence with the homotopy pushout of the respective homotopy ﬁbres. Thus, since g is a homotopy equivalence, the induced map g : F → D, between the homotopy ﬁbres of the source and target of g as spaces over K (G, 1), where denotes here the (unreduced) suspension, is again a homotopy equivalence. Therefore, π (F) [G : G ] and each path-component of F must have trivial integral homology. In addition, the homotopy ﬁbre of q : ∂M → K (G , 1) is identiﬁed with a path-component of F, so the map q is acyclic (see Sect. 5.2). In particular, q is an integral homology equivalence and arises as the plus construction associated to the kernel of ι. As a consequence, if ι is injective, then q : ∂M → K (G , 1) is a homotopy equivalence, so ∂M is again aspherical. Conversely, it is well known that the double is aspherical if M and ∂M are aspherical and ι is injective. On the other hand, we do not know if the injectivity of ι is necessary for the asphericity of the double. An interesting example of amenable glueings is given by connected sums: Proposition 2.10 [51], [45, Corollary 7.7] Let n ≥ 1 and let M and N be oriented closed connected n-manifolds. The following hold: (1) χ(M#N) = χ(M) + χ(N) − χ(S ); (2) If n ≥ 3,then M#N=M+N . In particular, if n ≥ 3,wehave: (3) If nisevenand χ(M) = 0 = χ(N),then χ(M#N) = 0; (4) If M= 0 =N ,then M#N= 0. Remark 2.11 Note that the connected sum of aspherical manifolds in dimension ≥ 3 is never aspherical [81, Lemma 3.2]. Thus, Proposition 2.10 cannot be used to produce counterexamples to Question 1.1. Example 2.12 The formula in Proposition 2.10(2) fails in dimension 2. For example, hyperbolic surfaces have nonzero simplicial volume (Example 3.1(1)) but the two- dimensional torus has zero simplicial volume (Example 3.2.(1)). 44 Page 10 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 2.3 A relative version of Gromov’s question We consider the following version of Question 1.1 for manifolds with boundary and show that it is a consequence of Property (SVχ) (Proposition 2.15). Question 2.13 Let (M, ∂M) be an oriented compact aspherical manifold with non-empty π -injective aspherical boundary. Does the following implication hold? M, ∂M= 0 =⇒ χ(M, ∂M) = 0. (SVχ, ∂) Remark 2.14 For every oriented compact connected n-manifold M with boundary ∂M, we have |χ(M)|=|χ(M, ∂M)|. Indeed, when n is even, we know that χ(∂M) = 0, so χ(M, ∂M) = χ(M) − χ(∂M) = χ(M). On the other hand, when n is odd, we have χ(∂M) = 2 · χ(M), so χ(M, ∂M) = χ(M) − χ(∂M) =−χ(M). In order to disprove Property (SVχ), it suﬃces to ﬁnd an example that does not satisfy Property (SVχ, ∂): Proposition 2.15 Let n ≥ 1. If all oriented closed aspherical manifolds of dimension n or n − 1 satisfy Property (SVχ), then all oriented compact aspherical n-manifolds with non-empty π -injective aspherical boundary satisfy Property (SVχ, ∂). Proof Let (M, ∂M) be an oriented compact aspherical n-manifold with non-empty π - injective aspherical boundary. Then the double D(M):= M ∪ M is an oriented closed ∂M aspherical n-manifold (Remark 2.9)and D(M)≤ 2 ·M, ∂M (Example 2.8). Suppose M, ∂M= 0. Then D(M)= 0and ∂M= 0(Remark 2.3). From Prop- erty (SVχ)indimension n and n − 1, respectively, we conclude χ D(M) =0and χ(∂M) = 0. Therefore, we compute χ(M, ∂M) = χ(M) − χ(∂M) = · χ(D(M)) + χ(∂M) − χ(∂M) = 0. Hence, (M, ∂M) satisﬁes Property (SVχ, ∂). Example 2.16 Note that Property (SVχ, ∂) does not hold for all oriented compact aspher- ical manifolds without the π -injectivity condition on the boundary. For example, if we take an oriented closed connected hyperbolic even-dimensional manifold N and let 2 1 M := N ×D , then M and ∂M = N ×S are aspherical and M, ∂M= 0 (Proposition 3.19 2 1 or Example 3.2(4)). On the other hand, we have χ(M, ∂M) = χ(N)·χ(D ,S ) = χ(N) = 0. Remark 2.17 Note that by allowing the case of empty boundary, Proposition 2.15 can be formulated as an equivalence between Question 2.13 and Question 1.1. The exten- sion of Gromov’s question to manifolds with boundary allows us in particular to explore Question 1.1 by studying the properties of (vanishing of) the simplicial volume and the Euler characteristic along glueings of manifolds and compare their respective additivity properties. This viewpoint will also be explored in Sect. 4. Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 11 of 36 44 2.4 The comparison map Dually, simplicial volume can be expressed in terms of bounded cohomology. Bounded cohomology ∗ ∗ ∗ H ( · ; R):= H (C ( · ; R)) b b is the cohomology of the topological dual C ( · ; R) of the singular chain complex, where the dual is taken with respect to the -norm. Bounded cohomology is then endowed with the -seminorm, denoted by · . ∗ ∗ The inclusion C ( · ; R) → C ( · ; R) induces a natural transformation ∗ ∗ ∗ comp : H ( · ; R) =⇒ H ( · ; R), which is called the comparison map. A straightforward application of the Hahn–Banach Theorem shows: Proposition 2.18 (Duality principle [51]) Let (X, A) be a pair of spaces, let k ∈ N,and let α ∈ H (X, A; R).Then k k α = sup comp (ϕ), α ϕ ∈ H (X, A; R), ϕ ≤ 1 . 1 ∞ X,A b In particular: If (M, ∂M) is an oriented compact connected n-manifold with (possibly empty) boundary, then M, ∂M is the operator norm of the composition ∩[M,∂M] comp M,∂M n n H (M, ∂M; R) − −−−−− → H (M, ∂M; R) R and comp is surjective ⇐⇒ M, ∂M > 0. (M,∂M) Proposition 2.19 Let M be an oriented closed connected n-manifold such that M= 0. Suppose that x ∈ H (M; R) is bounded (i.e. x lies in the image of the comparison map k ∗ n−k ∗ ∗ comp ) and let x ∈ H (M; R) be such that x ∪ x = 0.Thenx is not bounded. k k Proof Let y ∈ H (M; R) be a class with comp (y) = x. Assume for a contradiction b M n−k n−k ∗ n−k that x ∈ H (M; R)liesinthe imageofcomp , that is, there is z ∈ H (M; R) M b n−k with comp (z) = x . The usual explicit formula for the cup-product on singular coho- mology shows that the cup-product lifts to a cup-product on bounded cohomology. Then n k n−k ∗ comp (y ∪ z) = comp (y) ∪ comp (z) = x ∪ x = 0, M M M n n so comp maps surjectively onto H (M; R) = R. But this contradicts the assump- tion M= 0 according to Proposition 2.18. The vanishing of the simplicial volume thus implies that not too many classes can be bounded; dually, the vanishing of the simplicial volume causes that there are many other classes with vanishing -semi-norm. Corollary 2.20 Let M be an oriented closed connected n-manifold satisfying M= 0 and let N (M; R):={α ∈ H (M; R) |α = 0}.Then ∗ ∗ 1 dim N (M; R) ≥ · dim H (M; R). R k R k k∈N k∈N 44 Page 12 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Proof On the one hand, by the duality principle (Proposition 2.18), we have dim H (M; R) − dim N (M; R) = dim (im comp ) R R R k k for all k ∈ N. On the other hand, Poincaré duality and Proposition 2.19 imply that 1 1 k k dim (im comp ) ≤ · dim H (M; R) = · dim H (M; R). R R R k 2 2 k∈N k∈N k∈N Combining both estimates gives the claim. 2.5 Boundedness of the Euler class The Euler characteristic of an oriented closed connected smooth n-manifold M can be expressed in terms of the Euler class e(M) ∈ H (M; R)[85]via χ(M) = e(M), [M] . The norm of the Euler class has been studied extensively in the literature, especially, in connection with the existence of ﬂat structures (a detailed account of results in this direction is given in Frigerio’s book [45]). The boundedness of the Euler class is also closely related to Question 1.1. Question 2.21 Let M be an oriented closed aspherical smooth n-manifold. Does the following property hold? The Euler class e(M) ∈ H (M; R)is bounded. (Eub) Proposition 2.22 Let n ∈ N and let M be an oriented closed connected smooth n-manifold. Then the following are equivalent: (1) The manifold M satisﬁes Property (SVχ). (2) The manifold M satisﬁes Property (Eub). Proof Let M satisfy Property (SVχ). If M= 0, then e(M), [M]= χ(M) = 0. By duality, this implies that e(M) = 0; in particular, e(M) is bounded. On the other hand, if M > 0, then the comparison map is surjective (Proposition 2.18); hence, e(M)isalso bounded. This shows that M satisﬁes Property (Eub). Conversely, suppose that e(M) is bounded. Then χ(M) = e(M), [M] ≤ e(M) ·M. As a consequence, if M= 0, then χ(M) = 0; i.e. M satisﬁes Property (SVχ). Remark 2.23 Let (M, ∂M) be an oriented compact connected manifold with boundary. We may deﬁne e(M, ∂M) ∈ H (M, ∂M; R) to be the Poincaré dual class to χ(M) ∈ Z = H (M; Z). We recall that |χ(M)|= |χ(M, ∂M)| (Remark 2.14). Then Property (SVχ, ∂) is equivalent to e(M, ∂M) ∈ H (M, ∂M; R)isbounded. (Eub, ∂) The proof is the same as for Proposition 2.22. Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 13 of 36 44 Remark 2.24 It is well known that the Euler class of ﬂat vector bundles is bounded [45, Section 13]. This shows that if M= 0 and the tangent bundle of M admits a ﬂat connection, then χ(M) = 0[17,63], [45, Theorem 13.11]. Moreover, it was conjectured [45, Conjecture 13.13] that the Euler class of topologically ﬂat sphere bundles admits a bounded representative. Monod and Nariman [88,Theo- rem 1.8] have recently proved that the Euler class of the (discrete) group of orientation- preserving homeomorphisms of S is unbounded. Example 2.25 Assuming that Question 1.1 has an aﬃrmative answer, then Proposi- tion 2.22 has interesting implications for the existence of tangential maps between smooth manifolds. We recall that a map f : M → N between closed smooth manifolds is called tangential if the vector bundles TM and f TN are isomorphic. As a consequence, a tan- gential map f : M → N between oriented closed connected smooth manifolds preserves the Euler class up to sign. Assuming Question 1.1, it follows that there cannot exist tangen- tial maps f : M → N if χ(M) = 0and N is aspherical with zero simplicial volume. Indeed, assuming that N satisﬁes Property (SVχ), it follows that e(N) = 0(since χ(N) = 0). Then, given a tangential map f : M → N, the classes f (e(N)) and e(M) agree up to sign, so e(M) = 0 (and therefore also χ(M) = 0). 3 Vanishing of the simplicial volume In this section, we collect some known results on the simplicial volume. We will be mainly interested in describing suﬃcient conditions for the vanishing of the simplicial volume. We also compare those situations with the respective behaviour of the Euler characteristic. 3.1 Computations of the simplicial volume In general, computing exact values of the simplicial volume is diﬃcult. For example, the problem of determining whether a given (triangulated) manifold has vanishing sim- plicial volume or not is undecidable [102, Chapter 2.6]. The two major sources for (non-)vanishing results are amenability (which leads to vanishing) and negative curva- ture (which leads to non-vanishing). Example 3.1 (Non-vanishing) The following manifolds have positive simplicial volume: (1) Oriented closed connected hyperbolic manifolds [51,101]; (2) The compactiﬁcation of oriented connected complete ﬁnite-volume hyperbolic manifolds [49,51]; (3) Oriented closed connected manifolds with negative sectional curvature [59]; (4) Oriented closed connected locally symmetric spaces of non-compact type [18,69]; (5) Oriented closed connected manifolds with non-positive sectional curvature and suﬃciently negative intermediate Ricci curvature [25]; (6) Oriented closed connected manifolds with non-positive sectional curvature and strong enough conditions at a single point [26]; (7) Oriented closed connected rationally essential (e.g. aspherical) manifolds of dimen- sion ≥ 2 with non-elementary hyperbolic fundamental group (this follows via the duality principle from work of Mineyev on surjectivity of the comparison map [86]); (8) Oriented closed connected rationally essential manifolds of dimension ≥ 2with non-elementary relatively hyperbolic fundamental group [7]; 44 Page 14 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 (9) Non-vanishing of simplicial volume is inherited through a proportionality principle [51,70,101]: If M and N are oriented closed connected Riemannian manifolds with isometric universal coverings, then M > 0ifand only if N > 0. In this paper, we focus our attention on vanishing results for the simplicial volume. The following example contains some known vanishing results: Example 3.2 (Vanishing) The following manifolds have zero simplicial volume: (1) Oriented closed connected n-manifolds with amenable fundamental group and n > 0[51] or, more generally, with n-boundedly acyclic fundamental group [51,89]; ﬁnitely presented non-amenable boundedly acyclic groups have been recently con- structed [42,87]; (2) Oriented compact connected n-manifolds M with non-empty boundary such that both the fundamental groups of M and of ∂M areamenable[51]; (3) More generally, oriented compact connected n-manifolds M with non-empty n−1 boundary such that ∂M= 0 and the connecting homomorphism H (∂M) → H (M, ∂M) is surjective. Manifolds satisfying the latter condition can be constructed by taking manifolds whose boundary inclusion is π -surjective and such that their fundamental group lies in Lex [10]. Recall that Lex groups are those groups such that every epimorphism induces an injective map in bounded cohomology in every degree. Examples of Lex groups contain free groups, amenable groups [10], boundedly acyclic groups and certain extensions of these [42,Remark3.8]. (4) Oriented compact connected manifolds with (possibly empty) boundary that admit a self-map f of degree deg(f ) ∈{ / 0, 1, −1} [51]; (5) Oriented closed connected manifolds that are the boundary of an oriented compact connected manifolds with zero simplicial volume (Remark 2.3); (6) Oriented closed connected n-manifolds that admit a smooth non-trivial S -action [104]. More generally, manifolds admitting an F-structure also have zero simplicial volume [24,91]; (7) Oriented closed aspherical manifolds supporting an aﬃne structure whose holon- omy map is injective and contains a pure translation [14]; (8) Oriented closed connected smooth manifolds with zero minimal volume [8,51]or zero minimal volume entropy [51,p.37] [4]; (9) Oriented closed connected graph 3-manifolds [51,99]; (10) All mapping tori of oriented closed connected 3-manifolds [16]; however, the general behaviour of simplicial volume of general mapping tori is very diverse [65]. Remark 3.3 In view of Question 1.1, it would be interesting to understand whether all oriented closed aspherical manifolds that admit a self-map f of degree deg(f ) ∈{ / 0, 1, −1} must have zero Euler characteristic. For surfaces this is clearly the case (the only candidate being the torus). More generally, this is known to be true whenever the fundamental group of the aspherical manifold is Hopﬁan [2]. The statement was claimed in full generality by Sullivan [100, Footnote 23, p. 318] without a proof. 3.2 Amenable covers: the closed case A useful approach to investigate the vanishing of simplicial volume is to consider amenable covers. This idea dates back to Gromov [51] and it was then developed further by many Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 15 of 36 44 authors [3,21,44,47,50,60,62,76,79,93]. We use the terminology of amenable category [21,50,76]: Deﬁnition 3.4 (Amenable covers and category) (1) Let X be a topological space and let U be a subset of X. We say that U is amenable in X if for every x ∈ U the image im π (U → X, x) ≤ π (X, x) 1 1 is amenable. We say that an open cover of X is amenable, if it consists of amenable sets. (2) The amenable category of X, denoted by cat (X), is the minimal integer n such Am that X admits an open amenable cover with cardinality n. If no such integer exists, we simply set cat (X) =+∞. Am The vanishing results for open amenable covers are usually stated in terms of assump- tions on the multiplicity of the cover instead of the cardinality. These assumptions essen- tially are the same when working with paracompact Hausdorﬀ spaces [21, Remark 3.13]. The importance of amenable covers in our setting is demonstrated by the following two results: Theorem 3.5 (Gromov’s vanishing theorem [51, p. 40]) Let M be an oriented closed connected n-manifold. Then, cat (M) ≤ n =⇒ M= 0. Am A similar result for the Euler characteristic has been proved by Sauer [97]: Theorem 3.6 (Euler characteristic and amenable covers) Let M be an oriented closed aspherical n-manifold. Then, cat (M) ≤ n =⇒ χ(M) = 0. Am Remark 3.7 In Theorem 3.6, the asphericity assumption is crucial: every even-dimensional sphere provides a counterexample in the non-aspherical setting. In particular, Theorems 3.5 and 3.6 show that all oriented closed aspherical manifolds M with cat (M) ≤ dim(M) satisfy Property (SVχ). Am Example 3.8 Certain ﬁbre bundles yield examples of the situation arising in Theorems 3.5 and 3.6.Let N → M → B be a ﬁbre bundle of oriented closed connected manifolds and suppose that dim(M) cat (N) ≤ . Am dim(B) + 1 Then, we have cat (M) ≤ dim(M)[76, Corollary 1.2] (and dim(M) ≥ dim(B) + 1 ≥ 1). Am Using Theorems 3.5 and 3.6, we conclude: (a) M= 0(Theorem 3.5). (b) If M is aspherical, then also χ(M) = 0 (Theorem 3.6). 44 Page 16 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Concerning (b), it should be noted that in this case the asphericity of N is also suﬃcient in order to conclude that χ(M) = 0. Indeed the hypothesis on cat (N) shows that Am dim(M) dim(B) + dim(N) dim(B) dim(N) cat (N) ≤ = = + . Am dim(B) + 1 dim(B) + 1 dim(B) + 1 dim(B) + 1 Since cat (N) is an integer, it follows that cat (N) ≤ dim(N). Thus, χ(N) = 0(Theo- Am Am rem 3.6)and so χ(M) = χ(N) · χ(B) = 0. Recently, Gromov’s vanishing theorem was extended to weaker situations, such as weakly boundedly acyclic open covers and other more general homotopy colimit decom- positions [62,93]. This new context suggests in particular the following question: Question 3.9 Let M be an oriented closed aspherical n-manifold. Assuming there exists a weakly boundedly acyclic open cover of M in the sense of Ivanov [62]withcardinality at most n, does it follow that χ(M) = 0? A negative answer to Question 3.9 would also produce closed aspherical examples that do not satisfy Property (SVχ). In fact, no example of an oriented closed aspherical manifold M with vanishing simplicial volume and cat (M) = dim(M) + 1seemstobe Am known. 3.3 Amenable covers: the case with boundary The vanishing theorem can also be extended to the relative setting via Gromov’s vanishing- ﬁniteness theorem [47,51,61]. We quickly recall the formulation of the vanishing- ﬁniteness theorem and mention two convenient special cases for compact manifolds with boundary: the relative vanishing theorem and the case of locally co-amenable subcom- plexes. For an oriented connected (possibly non-compact) manifold M without boundary, the locally ﬁnite simplicial volume is deﬁned by lf lf M := inf |c| c ∈ C (M; R) is a fundamental cycle of M , lf where C ( · ; R) denotes the (singular) locally ﬁnite chain complex of M. Because locally ﬁnite chains are not necessarily , the locally ﬁnite simplicial volume is not always ﬁnite. Theorem 3.10 (Vanishing-ﬁniteness theorem [51,p.58],[47, Section 7.2], [61,Theo- rem 4.6]) Let M be an oriented connected n-manifold without boundary and let (U ) be i i∈N an open cover of M with the following properties: (i) For each i ∈ N,the subset U ⊂ M is amenable and relatively compact. (ii) The sequence (U ) is amenable at inﬁnity, i.e. there exists an increasing i i∈N sequence (K ) of compact subsets of M such that: i i∈N (a) The family (M \ K ) is locally ﬁnite; i i∈N (b) For all i ∈ N,wehaveU ⊂ M \ K ; i i (c) For all suﬃciently large i ∈ N,the setU is amenable in M \ K . i i (iii) The multiplicity of (U ) is at most n. i i∈N lf Then M = 0. Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 17 of 36 44 Remark 3.11 Properties (a) and (b) in (ii) show that every sequence (U ) which is i i∈N amenable at inﬁnity is necessarily locally ﬁnite. Vanishing of the locally ﬁnite simplicial volume leads to vanishing results for the relative simplicial volume: Remark 3.12 If (M, ∂M) is an oriented compact connected manifold, then M, ∂M≤ lf int(M) [51], [71, Proposition 5.12]. In general, this inequality is strict [51,p.10],[71, lf Example 6.17]: For example, [0, 1], {0, 1} < ∞=(0, 1) . lf On the other hand, there is no known example for which int(M) is ﬁnite and distinct from M, ∂M. Theorem 3.13 (Relative vanishing theorem) Let (M, ∂M) be an oriented compact con- nected n-manifold that admits an amenable open cover (U ) with the following proper- i i∈I ties: (i) The multiplicity of (U ) is at most n. i i∈I (ii) The multiplicity of (U ∩ ∂M) is at most n − 1. i i∈I (iii) For each i ∈ I, the set U ∩ ∂M is amenable in ∂M. Then M, ∂M= 0. Proof In view of Remark 3.12, it suﬃces to show that the vanishing-ﬁniteness theo- rem (Theorem 3.10) can be applied to int(M). To this end, we modify the given open cover (U ) as follows. Up to homeomorphism, we can write i i∈I int(M) = M ∪ ∂M × [0, +∞) . ∂M We extend (U ) to the right-hand side by replacing the sets V of (U ) intersect- i i∈I i i∈I ing ∂M with V ∪ ((V ∩ ∂M) × [0, ∞)). Let (V ) be the resulting open cover of int(M). i i∈I We now upgrade this cover (V ) to a locally ﬁnite cover made of relatively compact i i∈I sets without increasing the multiplicity; because the intersection of (U ) with ∂M has i i∈I multiplicity at most n − 1, this is indeed possible by a standard procedure [47, Proof of Theorem 11.2.3, p. 144]. The resulting open cover satisﬁes all the conditions required by the vanishing-ﬁniteness theorem (Theorem 3.10). Based on Theorem 3.13, the following question is a special case of Question 2.13: Question 3.14 Let (M, ∂M) be an oriented compact aspherical n-manifold with non- empty π -injective aspherical boundary that admits an open cover as in Theorem 3.13. Then, do we have χ(M, ∂M) = 0? Amenable covers as in the vanishing-ﬁniteness theorem (Theorem 3.10) appear natu- rally in the presence of locally co-amenable subcomplexes [47,51]: Deﬁnition 3.15 (Locally co-amenable subcomplex [51,p.59],[47, Deﬁnition 11.2.1]) Let M be an oriented compact connected PL-manifold with non-empty boundary and let P be a simplicial complex such that M |P|. Assume that there exists a simplicial complex K ⊂ P such that |K|⊂ int(M)and M is homeomorphic to a closed regular neighbourhood of K inside P [47, Deﬁnition 11.1.4]. Suppose also that K has codimension at least 2 in M. Then, K is called locally co-amenable in P (or in M) if for each vertex v ∈ (K ) of the 44 Page 18 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 second barycentric subdivision K of K we have that π (|S \ (S ∩ K )|) 1 v v is amenable. Here, S denotes the simplicial sphere in P centred at v. Remark 3.16 If K is locally co-amenable in M, then M is homotopy equivalent to K . Remark 3.17 If both M and ∂M are aspherical and M admits a locally co-amenable sub- complex K , then the boundary inclusion is not π -injective: Indeed, if ∂M → M were π -injective, then π (∂M) would be isomorphic to a subgroup of π (M). So, asphericity 1 1 1 and the Shapiro lemma show that cd π (M) ≥ cd π (∂M) = dim(M) − 1. 1 1 However, as M is homotopy equivalent to K (Remark 3.16), also K is aspherical and thus cd π (M) ≤ dim(K ) ≤ dim(M) − 2, which is a contradiction. Proposition 3.18 If M is an oriented compact connected PL-manifold with non-empty boundary that admits a locally co-amenable subcomplex, then M, ∂M= 0. Proof Under the given assumptions, the vanishing-ﬁniteness theorem (Theorem 3.10) applies to int(M)[47, Theorem 11.2.3]. Therefore, M, ∂M= 0(Remark 3.12). 3.4 Products of manifolds While the Euler characteristic is multiplicative with respect to products, the product behaviour for the simplicial volume is more delicate. If one of the factors is closed, the vanishing behaviour of simplicial volume is controlled by the factors: Proposition 3.19 (Simplicial volume and products [12,51], [71, Proposition C.7]) Let M be an oriented closed connected m-manifold and let N be an oriented compact connected n-manifold with (possibly empty) boundary. Then, we have n + m M·N, ∂N≤M × N, ∂(M × N)≤ ·M·N, ∂N . The exact values in general are unknown; the only known nonzero computation is the product of two closed surfaces [19]. On the other hand, the product of at least three compact manifolds with non-empty boundary always has vanishing simplicial volume: Proposition 3.20 Let M ,M ,M be oriented compact connected PL-manifolds with non- 1 2 3 empty boundary. Then, we have M × M × M , ∂(M × M × M )= 0. 1 2 3 1 2 3 Proof In this situation, M × M × M admits a locally co-amenable subcomplex [51, 1 2 3 Example (a), p. 59], [47, Theorem 14]. Therefore, we can apply Proposition 3.18. An alternative proof is as follows: Let n = dim(M × M × M ). The homotopy 1 2 3 ﬁbre of the boundary inclusion in this case has trivial fundamental group and thus has trivial bounded cohomology. Hence, the induced map in bounded cohomology Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 19 of 36 44 k k H (M × M × M ) → H (∂(M × M × M )) is an isomorphism in every degree [51,89]. 1 2 3 1 2 3 b b The long exact sequence of the pair then implies that H (M ×M ×M , ∂(M ×M ×M )) 1 2 3 1 2 3 is trivial, whence M × M × M , ∂(M × M × M )= 0 (Proposition 2.18). 1 2 3 1 2 3 A nice application of the previous result is the following: 2 × Example 3.21 Let (T ) denote a two-dimensional torus with an open disk removed. 2 × Then the simplicial volume of the product of (at least) three copies of (T ) vanishes. On 2 × 2 × 2 × the other hand, χ((T ) × (T ) × (T ) ) =−1. While triple products have zero relative simplicial volume, the situation remains unde- cided in the following case of products of two compact manifolds [47, Question 8]: Question 3.22 Let M and N be oriented compact connected manifolds with non-empty connected boundaries. Does it follow that M × N, ∂(M × N)= 0? (SV×) Remark 3.23 Without the connectedness assumption on the boundary, there are products that do not satisfy Property (SV×). For example, it is known that the product of a compact hyperbolic surface with boundary and a closed interval has nonzero relative simplicial volume [51, p. 17], [71, Corollary 6.2]. The following proposition shows an interesting connection between Property (SV×) and Question 1.1. Proposition 3.24 Let M and N be oriented compact aspherical manifolds with non-empty π -injective aspherical boundary that satisfy χ(M) · χ(N) = 0. Furthermore, suppose that M and N have dimensions of diﬀerent parity and satisfy Property (SV×).Then ∂(M × N) does not satisfy Property (SVχ). Proof As M and N satisfy Property (SV×), we have M ×N, ∂(M ×N)= 0. In particular, ∂(M × N)= 0(Remark 2.3). Moreover, the boundary ∂(M × N) = (∂M × N) ∪ ∂M×∂N (M × ∂N) is aspherical and has even dimension. So it suﬃces to show that ∂(M × N) has nonzero Euler characteristic. Since χ(M × N) = χ(M) · χ(N) = 0and M × N is odd-dimensional, we have χ(∂(M × N)) = 2 · χ(M × N) = 0. 3.5 Small aspherical ﬁllings We now come to a higher-order version of vanishing, which asks for “small” aspherical ﬁllings of the given manifold with vanishing Euler characteristic/simplicial volume. We will be mainly interested in ﬁlling aspherical 3-manifolds with amenable fundamental group. Deﬁnition 3.25 [37,p.3]Let M be an oriented closed aspherical 3-manifold. We deﬁne Fill (M):= min |χ(W )|, W ∈F(M) where F(M) denotes the class of all oriented compact aspherical 4-manifolds W with π -injective boundary M. 1 44 Page 20 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Question 3.26 (Edmonds [37, p. 3]) Does there exist an oriented closed connected 3- manifold M with Fill (M) = 0? In the same spirit, we could ask the corresponding question for the simplicial volume: Deﬁnition 3.27 Let M be an oriented closed connected 3-manifold. We say that M admits a small aspherical ﬁlling if there exists W ∈ F(M) such that W, M= 0. The previous deﬁnition suggests the following question: Question 3.28 Does every oriented closed aspherical 3-manifold satisfy the following implication? π (M)isamenable =⇒ M admits a small aspherical ﬁlling. (Fill) Question 3.28 can be interpreted as a manifold variant of the uniform boundary condi- tion (UBC) [82]. Recall that a space X satisﬁes UBC in dimension n if there exists a con- stant K > 0 such that every boundary c ∈ im ∂ ⊂ C (X; R) can be ﬁlled K -eﬃciently, n+1 n i.e. there exists a chain b ∈ C (X; R) such that ∂ b = c and |b| ≤ K ·|c| . Spaces n+1 n+1 1 1 with amenable fundamental groups satisfy UBC in all dimensions [82]. Therefore, in a similar way, Question 3.28 asks whether the small fundamental cycles of oriented closed connected 3-manifolds M with amenable fundamental group can be ﬁlled eﬃciently using relative fundamental cycles of 4-manifolds with M as π -injective boundary. Similar quantiﬁed bordism problems have been successfully studied in more geometric contexts [22]. Remark 3.29 Property (Fill)does not hold in dimension 1. Indeed, the only surfaces that have the circle as π -injective boundary are hyperbolic surfaces with totally geodesic boundary. All these have uniformly positive simplicial volume (Example 3.1(2)). Property (Fill) holds in dimension 2. The only candidate to check is the 2-torus, which 1 2 × is the π -injective boundary of S × (T ) . Our interest in Question 3.28 is motivated by the following open problem in four- dimensional topology: Conjecture 3.30 [37, Conjecture 1] There exists an oriented closed aspherical 4- manifold M with χ(M) = 1. The last conjecture and Question 1.1 are connected as follows: Proposition 3.31 Suppose that the following hold: (a) Every oriented closed aspherical 3-manifold satisﬁes Property (Fill); (b) All oriented closed aspherical 4-manifolds satisfy Property (SVχ). Then Conjecture 3.30 holds. Proof Edmonds [37] constructed an oriented compact aspherical 4-manifold W with non-empty π -injective aspherical boundary and χ(W ) = 1[37, Proposition 4.1]. More- over, ∂W is a torus bundle over the circle [37, Proposition 4.1]. This shows that ∂W has amenable fundamental group. Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 21 of 36 44 Using Property (Fill), there exists an oriented compact aspherical 4-manifold W with π -injective boundary ∂W ∂W (orientation-reversing) and W , ∂W = 0. More- over, by hypothesis, Property (SVχ) is satisﬁed both for all three- and four-dimensional oriented closed aspherical manifolds (Property (SVχ) is automatically satisﬁed in odd dimensions). Hence, Proposition 2.15 shows that (W , ∂W ) satisﬁes Property (SVχ, ∂), and so χ(W , ∂W ) = 0. Therefore, M := W ∪ ∼ W ∂W ∂W is an oriented closed aspherical 4-manifold with χ(M) = χ(W ) + χ(W , ∂W ) = 1 + 0 = 1. Therefore M provides the required example for Conjecture 3.30. 4 Simplicial volume and cobordism categories In this section, we will introduce the amenable cobordism category and explain how the simplicial volume extends to a symmetric monoidal functor on this cobordism category. In other words, the simplicial volume deﬁnes an invertible TQFT in this restricted sense. Interestingly, it will be shown that the simplicial volume does not extend to a functor on the whole cobordism category of smooth oriented manifolds. This fact reﬂects the (non-)additivity properties of the simplicial volume. Viewing the simplicial volume as an invertible TQFT will allow us to obtain some interesting information about the fundamental group of the amenable cobordism category and its variations. Speciﬁcally, we will show that this fundamental group is not ﬁnitely generated (Theorem 4.5). This result is based on the following computations of simplicial volume in dimension 4: Remark 4.1 For n ∈ N,let SV(n) ⊂ R denote the set of simplicial volumes of all ≥0 oriented closed connected n-manifolds. Then SV(n) is a countable submonoid of (R , +) ≥0 [58, Remark 2.3]. If n ≥ 4, then SV(n)has no gapatzero[58] and thus is non-discrete. Moreover, SV(3) contains the set of all volumes of oriented closed connected hyperbolic 3-manifolds (scaled by 1/v ) and thus is non-discrete [101]. Therefore, if n ≥ 3, then the additive monoid SV(n) is not ﬁnitely generated. Moreover, SV(4) contains an inﬁnite family of values that are linearly independent over Q [57]. We ﬁrst consider the simpler case of the connected sum monoid and prove that it is not ﬁnitely generated (Sect. 4.1). In Sect. 4.2, we explain how to view the simplicial volume as a symmetric monoidal functor on the amenable cobordism category and use this description to deduce the non-ﬁnite generation of the fundamental group of the four-dimensional amenable cobordism category (Theorem 4.5). Finally, we prove that the functor of simplicial volume cannot be extended to an invertible TQFT on the whole cobordism category (Proposition 4.7). 4.1 The connected sum monoid For n ∈ N, let Mfd denote the monoid, whose elements are diﬀeomorphism classes of oriented closed connected smooth n-manifolds and whose operation is given by connected 44 Page 22 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 sum. By the classiﬁcation of surfaces, the monoid Mfd is generated by the 2-torus. This ﬁnite generation fails in higher dimensions: Proposition 4.2 Let n ∈ N . Then the monoid Mfd is not ﬁnitely generated. ≥3 Proof As simplicial volume is additive in dimension ≥ 3 with respect to connected sums (Proposition 2.10), we can view the simplicial volume as a monoid homomorphism S:Mfd → R ≥0 # # from Mfd to the additive monoid (R , +). The submonoid S(Mfd ) is not ﬁnitely gen- ≥0 n n erated (Remark 4.1). Because ﬁnite generation is preserved by monoid homomorphisms, we conclude that Mfd is not ﬁnitely generated. Remark 4.3 As suggested by the referee, the previous result also admits a more geometric proof: In every dimension n ≥ 3 there exist inﬁnitely many hyperbolic n-manifolds (and none of them is a non-trivial connected sum). 4.2 Simplicial volume as a TQFT The simplicial volume can be viewed as an (invertible) TQFT deﬁned on an appropriate cobordism category of oriented smooth manifolds. This is essentially a basic consequence of known additivity properties of the simplicial volume. For background material about cobordism categories and TQFTs, we refer the interested reader to the work of Abrams [1] and the book by Kock [68], both of which focus especially on the two-dimensional case, and to the lecture notes of Debray et al. [34], which contain an excellent exposition of the classiﬁcation of invertible TQFTs following major recent developments in the ﬁeld. 4.2.1 Cobordism categories For d ∈ N,let Cob denote the d-dimensional (discrete) cobordism category of ori- ented manifolds [34,68]. The objects of Cob are oriented closed smooth (d − 1)- manifolds M, one from each diﬀeomorphism class. A morphism from M to N in Cob is an equivalence class of d-dimensional oriented smooth cobordisms (W ; ∂ W, ∂ W ) in out equipped with orientation-preserving diﬀeomorphisms −M → ∂ W (incoming bound- in ary) and N → ∂ W (outgoing boundary). The equivalence relation is given by out orientation-preserving diﬀeomorphisms that preserve the boundary pointwise. Compo- sition of morphisms in Cob is given by glueing of cobordisms, using the given identiﬁca- tions of the boundary components. The category Cob is a symmetric monoidal category under the operation of disjoint union. 4.2.2 Amenability conditions Let G be a class of groups that is closed under isomorphisms. We consider the subcate- gory Cob ⊂ Cob deﬁned as follows: The objects are those manifolds with fundamental group in G (for each component). The morphisms are the cobordisms (W ; M, N) such that M → W and N → W are π -injective (for all components). It should be noted G G that Cob is indeed a subcategory of Cob , i.e. that Cob is closed under composition. d d To see this, we only need to check that the π -injectivity of the boundary components is preserved under composition of cobordisms. This can be shown inductively by glueing one pair of components at a time and applying the Seifert–van Kampen theorem as well Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 23 of 36 44 as the normal form theorems for amalgamated free products and HNN extensions [96, Chapter 11]. These guarantee at each stage that the remaining boundary components are π -injective in the resulting manifold. The symmetric monoidal pairing of Cob clearly restricts to a symmetric monoidal G Am pairing on Cob . When G = Am is the class of all amenable groups, we will refer to Cob d d as the amenable cobordism category. 4.2.3 Simplicial volume as a TQFT on the amenable cobordism category Let R = (R, +) denote the additive (abelian) group of real numbers, regarded as a sym- metric monoidal groupoid with one object. Moreover, let G be a class of amenable groups that is closed under isomorphisms. The additivity of the simplicial volume with respect to amenable glueings (Theorem 2.5) and disjoint union shows that we obtain a symmetric monoidal functor with values in the abelian group R (regarded as a symmetric monoidal category): −:Cob → R, (W ; M, N) →W, ∂W . In other words, the simplicial volume deﬁnes a TQFT on Cob . Because this TQFT takes values in an abelian group (hence Picard groupoid), it is invertible. 4.2.4 The fundamental group of B Cob G G Let B Cob denote the classifying space of the cobordism category Cob . An object M d d G G G of Cob determines a point (0-simplex) [M] ∈ B Cob and we denote by B Cob the d d d loop space of the classifying space B Cob based at [M]. Note that the monoid of path- G G components of B Cob is a group (similarly to B Cob ). Thus, B Cob is an inﬁnite loop d d space, therefore, all of its path components have the same homotopy type. After passing to the classifying spaces, the functor − induces a group homomorphism: G G ∼ ∼ φ : π (B Cob , [M]) = π ( B Cob ) → π ( BR) = R. M 1 0 M 0 d d Here, we have used the homotopy equivalence B for groups . The group homo- morphisms φ (for all basepoints M) uniquely determine the functor −; similar facts hold more generally for functors whose target is a groupoid (see, for example, [34]). Remark 4.4 Every endomorphism (W ; M, M)inCob deﬁnes an element [W ] ∈ π ( B Cob ) whose image under the group homomorphism φ is the relative 0 M M simplicial volume W, ∂W . In particular, if [W ] = [W ], then W, ∂W=W , ∂W . Theorem 4.5 Let G ⊂ Am be a class of groups that is closed under isomorphisms and let G G Mbe an object of Cob . Then the group π (B Cob , [M]) is not ﬁnitely generated. 4 4 Proof The relative simplicial volume of 4-manifolds induces a group homomorphism φ : π (B Cob , [∅]) → R. ∅ 1 The image of this group homomorphism contains the subset SV(4) (Remark 4.4), which contains an inﬁnite family of elements that are linearly independent over Q (Remark 4.1). Therefore, the abelian group im φ is not ﬁnitely generated and so π (B Cob , [∅]) is not ∅ 1 ﬁnitely generated. 44 Page 24 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 As explained above, π (B Cob , [M]) is independent of the choice of basepoint [M], so the result follows. Remark 4.6 We also expect corresponding results in higher dimensions. However, cur- rently, not enough is known about the structure of SV(d) for d ≥ 5. 4.2.5 Non-extendability to Cob Since the simplicial volume does not satisfy additivity in general [45, Remark 7.9], it does not deﬁne a functor on Cob . However, it is still interesting to ask whether there might be a diﬀerent extension of the simplicial volume to general oriented compact manifolds with boundary which is always additive. This question is closely related to the problem of extending the functor −:Cob → R to the whole cobordism category Cob .Based on the classiﬁcation of functors with values in a groupoid (see, for example, [34]), this problem is essentially equivalent to the question of extending the homomorphism φ to π (B Cob , ∅). In contrast to π (B Cob , [M]) (Theorem 4.5), the fundamental group of the d- dimensional cobordism category π (B Cob , ∅) is well known and simpler to describe. We ﬁrst note that it agrees with the fundamental group of the standard topologized cobor- dism category C [34, Section 2.4]. This is again independent of the choice of basepoint and can be identiﬁed with the Reinhart bordism group R [95], [36, Appendix A]. We recall that R can be described as the group of equivalence classes of oriented closed d- manifolds where the equivalence relation is deﬁned by cobordisms whose tangent bundle is equipped with a nowhere-vanishing vector ﬁeld that extends the normal ﬁelds on the boundary components. This reﬁned bordism group is known to be a split extension of the SO usual oriented bordism group by a cyclic group whose generator is represented by the d-sphere. More precisely, there is a split exact sequence: [1]→[S ] SO 0 → Z/Eul − −−−− → R → →0(∗) d+1 d where Eul ={0} if n is odd, Eul = 2Z if n ≡ 2 (mod 4), and Eul = Z if n is a multiple n n n of 4. We refer to the literature [95], [36, Appendix A], [9] for the properties of the bordism group R and the description of the homotopy groups of BC in terms of bordism classes. d d Using this description of R π (B Cob , [∅]), we conclude below that the simplicial d 1 d volume of oriented closed d-manifolds cannot be extended to a functor on the cobordism category Cob , i.e. there is no additive extension of the simplicial volume − (analogous to Theorem 2.5) to all oriented compact d-manifolds. Let M denote the monoid of endomorphisms of ∅ in Cob , that is, the monoid of d d diﬀeomorphism classes of oriented closed d-manifolds under the operation of disjoint union. Proposition 4.7 Let d ≥ 2. (1) There is no functor Cob → R that extends the restriction of the simplicial volume − : M → R to oriented closed d-manifolds. |M (2) Let G ⊂ Am be a class of groups that is closed under isomorphisms. The functor −:Cob → R does not admit an extension to a functor on Cob . d Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 25 of 36 44 Proof For (1), note that such an extension of Cob → R would imply a factorization of − : M → R through R π (B Cob , [∅]) (see Remark 4.4). In particular, |M d d 1 d this would imply that − is invariant under the Reinhart bordism relation. Moreover, since S = 0, it would further follow from the exact sequence (∗) that − is invariant under oriented bordism. This is obviously false in general, e.g. note that M (−M) is null- bordant as oriented closed d-manifold, but its simplicial volume is non-trivial in general. Claim (2) follows directly from (1). Remark 4.8 The fact that − is not invariant under oriented bordism can also be shown SO as follows. Note that for d ∈{2, 3}, this fails because − is non-trivial but 0. Then the result follows in all dimensions by taking suitable products. We note also that for d = 4, SO this property can be shown to fail also because the oriented bordism group Z is ﬁnitely generated, whereas SV(4) is not ﬁnitely generated by Remark 4.1. Remark 4.9 In contrast to simplicial volume, the (relative) Euler characteristic deﬁnes a (symmetric monoidal) functor χ:Cob → Z (invertible TQFT), which sends (W ; M, N) to χ(W, M). Indeed, the Euler characteristic is invariant under the Reinhart bordism relation [95]. 5 Asphericalizations The construction of aspherical closed manifolds with vanishing simplicial volume is a key problem for Question 1.1. There are several known constructions of aspherical closed manifolds from non-aspherical or non-closed manifolds. Important examples of such constructions are Davis’ reﬂection group trick [27,28,30] and Gromov’s hyper- bolization [32,33,52]. The general diﬃculty with using these constructions to obtain (counter)examples to Question 1.1 has to do with the diﬃculty of computing the sim- plicial volume of the resulting aspherical closed manifolds. In this section, we consider extensions of the class of aspherical closed manifolds and look for interesting (counter)examples in these contexts. In particular, we will prove that the class of aspherical spaces that are homology equivalent to closed manifolds, as well as the class of closed manifolds that are homology equivalent to an aspherical space, do not satisfy Property (SVχ) in general (Theorem 5.7). We introduce the simplicial volume of such spaces in Sect. 5.1. The proof of Theorem 5.7 will be given in Sect. 5.3; the proof is based on the Kan–Thurston theorem [64], which we recall in Sect. 5.2. Finally, we end with some brief comments on known constructions of aspherical closed manifolds and their possible connections with Question 1.1 (Sect. 5.4). Besides their independent inter- est, we hope that the results of this section, especially, combined with the aforementioned constructions of aspherical closed manifolds, might provide useful tools for promoting non-aspherical or non-closed examples to closed aspherical (counter)examples to Ques- tion 1.1. 5.1 Simplicial volume of spaces homology equivalent to manifolds Our goal in this section is to extend the deﬁnition of simplicial volume to spaces that are only homology equivalent to an oriented closed manifold and discuss the main properties of this invariant. This is motivated by the following basic observation: 44 Page 26 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Remark 5.1 Suppose that M is an oriented closed connected manifold with M= 0. Let f : M → N be a homology equivalence to an oriented closed connected manifold N;in particular, this map has degree ±1andso N= 0 (this conclusion holds more generally if thedegreeof f is nonzero). Moreover, because f is a homology equivalence, it follows that χ(M) = χ(N). In this sense, Property (SVχ) is inherited under homology equivalences between oriented closed connected manifolds. Thus, in connection with Question 1.1, it would be interesting to understand the class of manifolds which are homology equivalent to an oriented closed aspherical manifold with vanishing simplicial volume. Deﬁnition 5.2 Let X be a topological space, let M be an oriented closed connected n-manifold and let f : X → M be an integral homology equivalence. We deﬁne the (R-)fundamental class of (X, f )by −1 [X] := H (f ; R) ([M]) ∈ H (X; R) f n n and the simplicial volume of X by X := [X] ∈ R . f ≥0 Remark 5.3 The simplicial volume of such spaces is well-deﬁned in the following sense. Let (X, M ,f ) be as above. In particular, H (X; Z) vanishes for k > n and H (X; Z) k n −1 H (M; Z) Z. Therefore, H (f ; Z) ([M] ) is one of the two generators of H (X; Z), n n Z n which only diﬀer by a sign. In particular, the R-fundamental class of (X, f ) is independent of M and f up to sign. Therefore, the simplicial volume of X is independent of the choice of M and f . Clearly the deﬁnition of X applies more generally whenever the map f : X → M induces an isomorphism on H (−; Z). Remark 5.4 (Degree estimate) Let (X, M, f )and (Y, N, g) be as in Deﬁnition 5.2, where M and N are oriented closed connected manifolds of the same dimension n.If h: X → Y is a continuous map, then the unsigned homological degree |deg h| is deﬁned to be the unique natural number d ∈ N with H (h; R)[X] =±d · [Y ] ∈ H (Y ; R). n f g n As in the manifold case, we clearly have |deg h|·Y ≤X and it follows that the simplicial volume of X is homotopy invariant. Moreover, if X admits a self-map h: X → X with |deg h|≥ 2, then X= 0. Furthermore, if h: X → Y is a (ﬁnite) covering map, then |deg h|·Y=X , as can be seen from the same argument as in the manifold case. This extension of the simplicial volume to a homotopy invariant of spaces that are only homology equivalent to an oriented closed manifold should not be confused with the fact that the simplicial volume is not invariant under homology equivalences: Example 5.5 There exist oriented closed connected non-positively curved (and hence aspherical) homology 4-spheres M [94]; in particular, M is homology equivalent to S and a result by Fujiwara and Manning [48, Corollary 2.5] shows that M > 0 =S . Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 27 of 36 44 5.2 Acyclic maps and plus constructions We review brieﬂy the deﬁnition and basic properties of acyclic maps and refer to the liter- ature [56,92] for more details. A map f : X → Y is acyclic if the induced homomorphism H (f ; A): H (X; f A) → H (Y ; A) ∗ ∗ ∗ is an isomorphism for every local coeﬃcient system A of abelian groups on Y ; in particular, f induces isomorphisms on singular homology and cohomology with both integral and real coeﬃcients. Equivalently, a map f : X → Y is acyclic if its homotopy ﬁbres have trivial integral homology. Every acyclic map f : X → Y between path-connected-based spaces arises up to weak homotopy equivalence as the plus construction ι : X → X with respect to a normal perfect subgroup P π (X). In this case, we have π (X ) π (X)/P. 1 1 Theorem 5.6 (Kan–Thurston [5,64,83]) For every path-connected based topological space X, there is a group G together with an acyclic (based) map f : K (G , 1) → X. X X X Moreover, G and f can be chosen to be natural in X. X X Proof The original functorial construction of (G ,f : K (G , 1) → X)isdue to Kan X X X and Thurston [64]. Alternative constructions and reﬁnements were obtained by Baum- slag et al. [5]andMaunder[83]. (These constructions are also shown to preserve properties of homotopy ﬁniteness, but they satisfy weaker functoriality properties in general.) 5.3 Using the Kan–Thurston theorem The Kan–Thurston theorem (Theorem 5.6) has the following consequence in connection with Question 1.1. Theorem 5.7 Let n ∈ N be even. ≥2 (1) There exist aspherical CW-complexes X that admit an acyclic map X → Mto an oriented closed connected n-manifold M, and satisfy both X= 0 and χ(X) = 0. In particular, these aspherical spaces do not satisfy Property (SVχ). (2) There exist oriented closed connected n-manifolds M that admit an acyclic map X → M from an aspherical CW-complex X, and satisfy both M= 0 and χ(M) = 0.In particular, these manifolds do not satisfy Property (SVχ). Proof Let M be an oriented closed connected n-manifold that has a (based) self- map h: M → M with |deg h|≥ 2 and satisﬁes χ(M) = 0. For example, as n is even, we may choose M = S . Ad 1.ByTheorem 5.6 (and the functoriality of the construction), there exists an aspher- ical CW-complex X with an acyclic map f : X → M and a map H : X → X that makes the following square commutative: X X f f M M. It follows that |deg H|=|deg h|≥ 2. Thus, X= 0(Remark 5.4). Moreover, as f is a homology equivalence, it follows that χ(X) = χ(M) = 0. Ad 2. It is suﬃcient to apply Theorem 5.6 to M. 44 Page 28 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 We give some further context on possible improvements of Theorem 5.7: Remark 5.8 (Poincaré duality) Hausmann [55] proved that the group G in the Kan– Thurston theorem (Theorem 5.6) can be chosen to be a duality group when X is homotopy ﬁnite. (A related interesting reﬁnement of the Kan–Thurston theorem has also been obtained more recently by Kim [66].) We do not know whether we can obtain homotopy ﬁniteexamplesinTheorem 5.7 and whether Hausmann’s construction can also be made suﬃciently functorial for the purpose of the proof above. Thus, it remains open whether Theorem 5.7 can be strengthened to produce examples where the fundamental group is a duality group. We note that it remains an open problem whether every ﬁnitely presented Poincaré duality group is the fundamental group of a closed aspherical manifold [31]. In this con- nection, we also recall the following question [64, Question (ii) p. 254]: Is every oriented closed connected n-manifold, n ≥ 4, homology equivalent to an oriented closed aspherical manifold? If this question has an aﬃrmative answer, then there exist aspherical homology spheres in all high dimensions. This would contradict a version of the Hopf conjecture, which claims that the Euler characteristic of every oriented closed aspherical 2k-manifold is either zero or its sign is (−1) [29]. 5.4 Further comments Davis’ reﬂection group trick [27,28,30] takes an oriented compact aspherical n- manifold (W, ∂W ) and constructs an oriented closed aspherical n-manifold M by reﬂect- ing W along so-called pieces of the boundary of W . The construction also yields a retrac- tion r : M → W i.e. r ◦ i = id , where i : W → M is the inclusion. In particular, π (r)and H (r)are W 1 ∗ ∗ ∗ epimorphisms; H (r)and H (r) are monomorphisms. Starting from “exotic” W , this method can be used to construct “exotic” closed aspherical manifolds. Note that we may choose W to be an oriented compact manifold that is homotopy equivalent to X as in Theorem 5.7(1), assuming that the space X can also be chosen to be homotopy ﬁnite [5]. There exists an explicit formula for computing the Euler characteristic of the mani- fold M in terms of the Euler characteristic of the input manifold W and the combinatorics of the pieces of ∂W [28, p. 218]. However, in the case of the simplicial volume, the situa- tion is more delicate. The Davis reﬂection group trick can be viewed as a reﬁned version of doubling manifolds with boundary, where the reﬁnement is given by the combina- torics of the pieces of ∂W . In order to generalize Example 2.8 to this setting, it would be desirable to ﬁnd input manifolds W with W, ∂W= 0 and where additionally the sim- plicial volume of W can be realized by small relative fundamental cycles, whose behaviour on ∂W is adapted to the combinatorics on the pieces of ∂W . Particularly interesting input candidates would be the examples from Remark 2.16 or Proposition 3.20. On the other hand, Gromov’s hyperbolization [32,33,52] is a construction that takes an oriented closed connected triangulated manifold N and produces an oriented closed aspherical manifold h(N) together with a degree 1 map c : h(N) → N. Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 29 of 36 44 In particular, h(N)≥N . In addition, h(N) is a smooth manifold if N is smooth, and h preserves the stable tangent bundle, i.e. the vector bundles T(h(N)) and c TN are stably isomorphic. This implies that hyperbolization preserves the characteristic classes and numbers of closed smooth manifolds. Also, h(N)and N are (oriented) cobordant. Since the mod 2 Euler characteristic of N is determined by the bordism class of N, it is natural to consider the hyperbolization in connection with the following weak version of Question 1.1: Question 5.9 Let M be an oriented closed aspherical manifold. Does the following impli- cation hold? M= 0 =⇒ χ(M) is even? (SVχ(mod2)) Assuming that M is smooth, the property “χ(M) is even” is equivalent to the vanishing of the top Stiefel–Whitney class of M. It would be interesting to ﬁnd N as above with the property h(N)= 0. We note here that the simplicial volume is always positive in the case of strict hyperbolization (in the sense of Charney and Davis [23]). A relative version of this construction, which might still be relevant in connection with Question 2.13, has also been studied by Belegradek [6]. 6 Stable integral simplicial volume Stable integral simplicial volume and integral foliated simplicial volume are versions of the simplicial volume that admit Poincaré duality estimates for Betti numbers and for the Euler characteristic. In this section, we recall deﬁnitions, basic properties, and known examples of stable integral simplicial volume, with a focus on the relative case and the connection with Property (SVχ, ∂). Moreover, we quickly outline the relation with the integral foliated simplicial volume. Deﬁnition 6.1 (Stable integral simplicial volume)Let (M, ∂M) be an oriented compact connected manifold M with (possibly empty) boundary ∂M.The stable integral simplicial volume of (M, ∂M)isdeﬁnedas N, ∂N ∞ Z M, ∂M := inf (N, f ) ∈ C(M) , |deg f | where C(M) denotes the class of all ﬁnite (connected) coverings of M. 6.1 Estimates for the Betti numbers and the Euler characteristic The key observation is that Poincaré duality leads to Betti number estimates for simplicial volumes with respect to suﬃciently integral coeﬃcient rings: Proposition 6.2 [80, Example 14.28], [54, p. 307], [67, Proposition 3.2] LetR beanormed principal ideal domain with |x|≥ 1 for all x ∈ R \{0}.Let (M, ∂M) be an oriented compact connected n-manifold with (possibly empty) boundary ∂M. Then, for all k ∈ N, b (M; R) ≤M, ∂M k R In particular, χ(M, ∂M) = χ(M) ≤ (n + 1) ·M, ∂M . R 44 Page 30 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Since the Euler characteristic is multiplicative with respect to ﬁnite coverings, this estimate also implies corresponding estimates for the stable integral simplicial volume [43, Proposition 6.1]: Corollary 6.3 Let (M, ∂M) be an oriented compact connected n-manifold with (possibly empty) boundary ∂M. Then χ(M, ∂M) ≤ (n + 1) ·M, ∂M . 6.2 Integral approximation problems This estimate for the Euler characteristic (Corollary 6.3) suggests the following question: Question 6.4 Let M be an oriented closed aspherical manifold with residually ﬁnite fundamental group. Does the following implication hold? ∞ ∞ M= 0 =⇒ M = 0. (SV ) Z Z The corresponding approximation question for nonzero values in general has a negative answer. For example, oriented closed connected hyperbolic manifolds M of dimension at least 4 satisfy M < M [43]. Moreover, Proposition 2.10 and Corollary 6.3 show that Property (SV ) does not hold for the connected sum of oriented closed aspherical manifolds with zero simplicial volume and zero Euler characteristic (of even dimension at least 4). However, these manifolds are never aspherical (Remark 2.11). In Question 6.4, one usually adds the hypothesis of residual ﬁniteness to ensure the existence of “enough” ﬁnite coverings. However, there are also no known examples of oriented closed aspherical manifolds with non-residually-ﬁnite fundamental group such that the vanishing behaviour of the ordinary simplicial volume is diﬀerent from that of the stable integral simplicial volume. One possible strategy to produce such examples is to use Davis’ reﬂection group trick (Sect. 5.4) to construct oriented closed aspherical manifolds whose fundamental group is not residually ﬁnite. However, as explained in Sect. 5.4,it seems to be diﬃcult to gain enough control on the (stable integral) simplicial volume when performing this construction. What about Question 6.4 for manifolds with boundary? Similarly to Property (SVχ, ∂), also in the case of the stable integral simplicial volume, we need to impose additional boundary conditions: Example 6.5 Let M be the product of three punctured tori as in Example 3.21. Then M is aspherical and M, ∂M=0and χ(M, ∂M) =−1. Hence, Corollary 6.3 implies that M, ∂M = 0, even though π (M) is residually ﬁnite. Question 6.6 Let M be an oriented compact aspherical manifold with residually ﬁnite fundamental group and non-empty π -injective aspherical boundary ∂M. Does the fol- lowing implication hold? M, ∂M= 0 =⇒ M, ∂M = 0. (SV , ∂) Z Z Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 31 of 36 44 We observe the following diagram of implications as a consequence of Corollary 6.3 and Proposition 2.15: Property (SVχ) Property (SVχ, ∂) ∞ ∞ Property (SV ) Property (SV , ∂) Z Z We do not know whether the diagram can be completed with a lower horizontal implica- tion. The main issue is the lack of suitably general additivity results concerning the integral simplicial volume. For example, given an oriented compact aspherical manifold M with residually ﬁnite fundamental group and non-empty π -injective aspherical boundary, it is ∞ ∞ not clear what the vanishing of D(M) has to say about the vanishing of M, ∂M . Z Z ∞ ∞ Conversely, however, the vanishing of M, ∂M implies the vanishing of D(M) : Z Z Proposition 6.7 Let (M, ∂M) be an oriented compact connected n-manifold with non- empty boundary ∂M. Then: ∞ ∞ (1) M, ∂M ≥∂M /(n + 1); Z Z ∞ ∞ (2) D(M) ≤ 2 ·M, ∂M . Z Z Proof Ad 1. First recall that N, ∂N ≥∂N /(n + 1) for every oriented compact Z Z connected n-manifold N with boundary ∂N (Remark 2.4). Suppose that M, ∂M = T ∈ R , then for every ε> 0 there exists an oriented compact connected ﬁnite covering N ≥0 ε of degree d such that N , ∂N ε ε Z T ≤ < T + ε. Hence, we also have 1 ∂N ε Z · < T + ε. n + 1 d Notice that the boundary ∂N might consist of several diﬀerent connected components S , ... ,S that cover ∂M with degrees d , ... ,d , respectively, such that d = d .By 1 1 ε i k k i=1 the pigeonhole principle, there exists a j ∈{1, ... ,k} with j Z · < T + ε, n + 1 d because d /d = 1and i ε i=1 k k 1 ∂N 1 S d 1 S i Z i i Z T + ε> · = · = · · . n + 1 d n + 1 d d n + 1 d ε ε ε i i=1 i=1 This shows that ∂M /(n + 1) ≤ T + ε. Letting ε → 0 proves the claim. Ad 2. If (N, ∂N) → (M, ∂M) is a ﬁnite covering of degree d, then the induced map D(N) → D(M) between the doubles is also a ﬁnite covering of degree d.More- over, by reﬂecting fundamental cycles (Example 2.8), we have D(N) ≤ 2 ·N, ∂N . Z Z Remark 6.8 Let (M, ∂M) be an oriented compact connected manifold with (possibly empty) boundary. Then Proposition 6.7 gives an alternative way to derive an Euler char- acteristic estimate for M, ∂M from the closed case. First, suppose that n := dim M is Z 44 Page 32 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 even. In this case, χ(D(M)) = 2 · χ(M, ∂M). Hence, the closed case of Corollary 6.3 and the second part of Proposition 6.7 show that ∞ ∞ 2 ·|χ(M, ∂M)|=|χ(D(M)|≤ (n + 1) ·D(M) ≤ 2 · (n + 1) ·M, ∂M . Z Z Suppose now that M has odd dimension n. Then, we know that χ(∂M) = 2 · χ(M). Hence, by the closed case of Corollary 6.3 and the ﬁrst part of Proposition 6.7,wehave 2 ·|χ(M, ∂M)|= 2 ·|χ(M) − χ(∂M)|=|χ(∂M)| ∞ ∞ ≤ n ·∂M ≤ n · (n + 1) ·M, ∂M . Z Z Example 6.9 For the following manifolds, the stable integral simplicial volume equals the classical simplicial volume; in particular, these examples satisfy Property (SV )or Property (SV , ∂), respectively: (1) All oriented compact aspherical surfaces [51,67]; (2) All oriented compact aspherical 3-manifolds with toroidal (or empty) boundary [40,41]; (3) All oriented closed connected generalized aspherical graph manifolds with residually ﬁnite fundamental group [40]; (4) All oriented closed aspherical manifolds with residually ﬁnite amenable fundamental group [46]; (5) All oriented compact aspherical smooth manifolds with residually ﬁnite fundamen- tal group admitting a non-trivial smooth S -action [39]; (6) All oriented compact aspherical smooth manifolds with residually ﬁnite fundamen- tal group admitting an F-structure [77]; (7) All oriented closed aspherical smooth manifolds with residually ﬁnite fundamental group admitting a regular circle foliation with ﬁnite holonomy groups [20]; (8) Every oriented closed aspherical manifold M with residually ﬁnite fundamental group and cat (M) ≤ dim(M)[77]. This applies, for example, to manifolds that Am are the total space of a ﬁbre bundle M → B with oriented closed connected ﬁbre N such that cat (N) ≤ dim(M)/(dim(B) + 1) and to manifolds of dimension Am n ≥ 4 whose fundamental group contains an amenable normal subgroup A whose quotient satisﬁes cd (/A) < n. Remark 6.10 The arguments discussed in this section can be extended to principal ideal domains with norm bounded from below by 1. Interesting examples of such rings include, for example, the ﬁnite ﬁelds with the trivial norm [75]. In this setting, the proof of Propo- sition 6.7 also applies verbatim. 6.3 The dynamical version The Poincaré duality arguments also apply to the dynamical version of the (integral) simplicial volume, i.e. to the integral foliated simplicial volume: Deﬁnition 6.11 (Integral foliated simplicial volume [40,54,98]) Let M be an oriented compact connected n-manifold with (possibly empty) boundary ∂M. Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 33 of 36 44 •If α = π (M) (X, μ) is a probability measure-preserving action on a standard Borel probability space, then we set ⎪ ⎪ α α α ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ M, ∂M := [M, ∂M] , α ∞ where [M, ∂M] ∈ H (M, ∂M; L (X; Z)) denotes the image of the usual fundamental class [M, ∂M] under the inclusion of Z into the twisted coeﬃcient module L (X; Z). α 1 The norm |·| on the twisted chain complex is taken with respect to the L -norm on L (X; Z). •The (relative) integral foliated simplicial volume of (M, ∂M)isdeﬁnedas ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ α ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ M, ∂M := inf M, ∂M , α∈A(π (M)) where A(π (M)) denotes the class of all probability measure-preserving π (M)- 1 1 actions on standard Borel probability spaces. Remark 6.12 For technical reasons, in the setting of manifolds with boundary, it is rec- ommended to work with actions of the fundamental groupoid instead of the fundamental group [40,41]. Proposition 6.13 Let (M, ∂M) be an oriented compact connected n-manifold with (pos- sibly empty) boundary ∂M. Then, for all k ∈ N, ⎪ ⎪ (2) ⎪ ⎪ b (M) ≤ ⎪ M, ∂M⎪ . ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ ⎪ In particular, χ(M, ∂M) = χ(M) ≤ (n + 1) · M, ∂M . Proof This is a relative version of the L -Betti number estimate which was shown in the closed case by Schmidt [98] based on ideas of Gromov [54, p. 306]. When phrasing the proof in terms of L -Betti numbers of standard equivalence relations, literally the same proof as in the closed case [74, Theorem 6.4.5] can be applied to the twisted Poincaré– Lefschetz duality isomorphism. Many positive examples for Question 1.1 have been established using the integral foli- ated simplicial volume (Sect. 1.3) and most of the known computations of the stable integral simplicial volume are based on ergodic theoretic methods and the fact that ⎪ ⎪ ∞ ⎪ ⎪ π (M) ⎪ ⎪ M, ∂M = M, ∂M holds [41, Proposition 2.12], [46,78], where π (M) denotes the dynamical system given by the proﬁnite completion of π (M). A summary of computations of integral foliated simplicial volume and of these ergodic theoretic methods can be found in the literature [74, Chapter 6]. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Igor Belegradek for helpful comments on Sect. 5.4. Funding Open access funding provided by Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna within the CRUI-CARE Agreement. Data availability statement On behalf of all the authors, the corresponding author states that we have no research data involved in our manuscript. Author details 1 2 Fakultät für Mathematik, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany, Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy. Received: 23 February 2022 Accepted: 10 June 2022 Published online: 14 July 2022 44 Page 34 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 References 1. Abrams, L.: Two-dimensional topological quantum ﬁeld theories and Frobenius algebras. J. Knot Theory Ramiﬁcations 5(5), 569–587 (1996) 2. Agol, I.: Degrees of self-maps of aspherical manifolds. Contribution to a MathOverﬂow discussion. https:// mathoverﬂow.net/questions/42168/degrees-of-self-maps-of-aspherical-manifolds (2010) 3. Babenko, I., Sabourau, S.: Minimal volume entropy and ﬁber growth. arXiv:2102.04551 (2021) 4. Balacheﬀ, F., Karam, S.: Macroscopic Schoen conjecture for manifolds with nonzero simplicial volume. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 372(10), 7071–7086 (2019) 5. Baumslag, G., Dyer, E., Heller, A.: The topology of discrete groups. J. Pure and Appl. Algebra 16(1), 1–47 (1980) 6. Belegradek, I.: Aspherical manifolds, relative hyperbolicity, simplicial volume and assembly maps. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 6(3), 1341–1354 (2006) 7. Belegradek, I., Hruska, G.C.: Hyperplane arrangements in negatively curved manifolds and relative hyperbolicity. Groups Geom. Dyn. 7(1), 13–38 (2013) 8. Besson, G., Courtois, G., Gallot, S.: Volume et entropie minimale des espaces localement symétriques. Invent. Math. 103(2), 417–445 (1991) 9. Bökstedt, M., Svane, A.M.: A geometric interpretation of the homotopy groups of the cobordism category. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 14(3), 1649–1676 (2014) n e 10. Bouarich, A.: Exactitude à gauche du foncteur H (−; R) de cohomologie bornée réelle. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse. 6 série 10(2), 255–270 (2001) 11. Braun, S.: Simplicial Volume and Macroscopic Scalar Curvature. Ph.D. Thesis, Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) (2018). Available online with https://doi.org/10.5445/IR/1000086838 12. Bucher, M.: Simplicial volume of products and ﬁber bundles. In: Discrete Groups and Geometric Structures, Volume 501 of Contemporary Mathematics, pp. 79–86. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2009) 13. Bucher, M., Burger, M., Frigerio, R., Iozzi, A., Pagliantini, C., Pozzetti, M.B.: Isometric embeddings in bounded cohomol- ogy. J. Topol. Anal. 6(1), 1–25 (2014) 14. Bucher, M., Connell, C., Lafont, J.F.: Vanishing simplicial volume for certain aﬃne manifolds. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 146, 1287–1294 (2018) 15. Bucher, M., Frigerio, R., Pagliantini, C.: The simplicial volume of 3-manifolds with boundary. J. Topol. 8(2), 457–475 (2015) 16. Bucher, M., Neofytidis, C.: The simplicial volume of mapping tori of 3-manifolds. Math. Ann. 376(3–4), 1429–1447 (2020) 17. Bucher-Karlsson, M.: Finiteness properties of characteristic classes of ﬂat bundles. Enseign. Math. (2), 53(1–2), 33–66 (2007) 18. Bucher-Karlsson, M.: Simplicial volume of locally symmetric spaces covered by SL R/SO(3). Geom. Dedicata 125, 203–224 (2007) 2 2 19. Bucher-Karlsson, M.: The simplicial volume of closed manifolds covered by H × H . J. Topol. 1, 584–602 (2008) 20. Campagnolo, C., Corro, D.: Integral Foliated Simplicial Volume and Circle Foliations. To appear in J. Topol. Anal. arXiv:1910.03071 21. Capovilla, P., Löh, C., Moraschini, M.: Amenable category and complexity. To appear in Algebr. Geom. Topol. arXiv:2012.00612 22. Chambers, G.R., Dotterrer, D., Manin, F., Weinberger, S.: Quantitative null-cobordism. J. Am. Math. Soc. 31(4), 1165–1203 (2018). With an appendix by Manin and Weinberger 23. Charney, R.M., Davis, M.W.: Strict hyperbolization. Topology 34(2), 329–350 (1995) 24. Cheeger, J., Gromov, M.: Collapsing Riemannian manifolds while keeping their curvature bounded. I. J. Diﬀer. Geom. 23(3), 309–346 (1986) 25. Connell, C., Wang, S.: Positivity of simplicial volume for nonpositively curved manifolds with a Ricci-type curvature condition. Groups Geom. Dyn. 13(3), 1007–1034 (2019) 26. Connell, C., Wang, S.: Some remarks on the simplicial volume of nonpositively curved manifolds. Math. Ann. 377, 969–987 (2020) 27. Davis, M.W.: Groups generated by reﬂections and aspherical manifolds not covered by Euclidean space. Ann. Math. 117(2), 293–324 (1983) 28. Davis, M.W.: Coxeter groups and aspherical manifolds. In: Madsen, I.H., Oliver, R.A. (eds) Algebraic Topology Aarhus 1982, pp. 197–221. Springer, Berlin (1984) 29. Davis, M.W.: The Hopf conjecture and the singer conjecture. In: Chatterji, I. (eds) Guido’s Book of Conjectures, Volume 40 of Monographie de L’Enseignement Mathematics, pp. 80–82. Princeton University Press (2008) 30. Davis, M.W.: The Geometry and Topology of Coxeter Groups (LMS-32). Princeton University Press (2012) 31. Davis, M.W.: Poincaré duality groups. In: Surveys on Surgery Theory (AM-145), volume 1, pp. 167–194. Princeton University Press (2014) 32. Davis, M.W., Januszkiewicz, T.: Hyperbolization of polyhedra. J. Diﬀer. Geom. 34(2), 347–388 (1991) 33. Davis, M.W., Januszkiewicz, T., Weinberger, S.: Relative hyperbolization and aspherical Bordisms: an addendum to “Hyperbolization of Polyhedra”. J. Diﬀer. Geom. 58(3), 535–541 (2001) 34. Debray, A., Galatius, S., Palmer, M.: Lectures on invertible ﬁeld theories. arXiv:1912.08706 (2019) 35. Dodziuk, J.: L harmonic forms on rotationally symmetric Riemannian manifolds. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 77(3), 395–400 (1979) 36. Ebert, J.: A vanishing theorem for characteristic classes of odd-dimensional manifold bundles. J. Reine Angew. Math. 684, 1–29 (2013) 37. Edmonds, A.L.: Aspherical 4-manifolds of odd Euler characteristic. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 148, 421–434 (2020) 38. Fauser, D.: Integral Foliated Simplicial Volume and S -Actions. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiät Regensburg, 2019. Available online with https://doi.org/10.5283/epub.40431 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 Page 35 of 36 44 39. Fauser, D.: Integral foliated simplicial volume and S -actions. Forum Math. 33(3), 773–788 (2021) 40. Fauser, D., Friedl, S., Löh, C.: Integral approximation of simplicial volume of graph manifolds. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 51(4), 715–731 (2019) 41. Fauser, D., Löh, C., Moraschini, M., Quintanilha, J.P.: Stable integral simplicial volume of 3-manifolds. J. Topol. 14(2), 608–640 (2021) 42. Fournier-Facio, F., Löh, C., Moraschini, M.: Bounded cohomology of ﬁnitely presented groups: vanishing, non-vanishing and computability. arXiv:2106.13567 (2021) 43. Francaviglia, S., Frigerio, R., Martelli, B.: Stable complexity and simplicial volume of manifolds. J. Topol. 5, 977–1010 (2012) 44. Frigerio, R.: Amenable covers and -invisibility. To appear in J. Topol. Anal. arXiv:1907.10547 45. Frigerio, R.: Bounded Cohomology of Discrete Groups, Volume 227. American Mathematical Society (2017) 46. Frigerio, R., Löh, C., Pagliantini, C., Sauer, R.: Integral foliated simplicial volume of aspherical manifolds. Israel J. Math. 216, 707–751 (2016) 47. Frigerio, R., Moraschini, M.: Gromov’s theory of multicomplexes with applications to bounded cohomology and simplicial volume. To appear in Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. arXiv:1808.07307 48. Fujiwara, K., Manning, J.: Simplicial volume and ﬁllings of hyperbolic manifolds. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 11(4), 2237–2264 (2011) 49. Fujiwara, K., Manning, J.K.: Simplicial volume and ﬁllings of hyperbolic manifolds. Algebr. Geom. Topol. 11, 2237–2264 (2011) 50. Gómez-Larrañaga, J., González-Acuña, F., Heil, W.: Amenable category of three-manifolds. Algebr. Geom. Top. 13, 905–925 (2013) 51. Gromov, M.: Volume and bounded cohomology. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 56, 5–99 (1982) 52. Gromov, M.: Hyperbolic Groups, pp. 75–263. Springer, New York (1987) 53. Gromov, M.: Asymptotic invariants of inﬁnite groups. In: Geometric Group Theory, Vol. 2 (Sussex, 1991), Volume 182 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, pp. 1–295. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993) 54. Gromov, M.: Metric structures for Riemannian and non-Riemannian spaces. Modern Birkhäuser Classics. Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, English edition, 2007. Based on the 1981 French original, With appendices by M. Katz, P. Pansu and S. Semmes, Translated from the French by Sean Michael Bates 55. Hausmann, J.-C.: Every ﬁnite complex has the homology of a duality group. Math. Ann. 275(2), 327–336 (1986) 56. Hausmann, J.-C., Husemoller, D.: Acyclic maps. Enseign. Math. (2), 25(1–2), 53–75 (1979) 57. Heuer, N., Löh, C.: Transcendental simplicial volumes. To appear in Ann. Inst. Fourier arXiv:1911.06386 (2020) 58. Heuer, N., Löh, C.: The spectrum of simplicial volume. Invent. Math. 223, 103–148 (2021) 59. Inoue, H., Yano, K.: The Gromov invariant of negatively curved manifolds. Topology 21, 83–89 (1982) 60. Ivanov, N.V.: Foundations of the theory of bounded cohomology, vol. 143, pp. 69–109, 177–178 (1985). Studies in topology, V 61. Ivanov, N.V.: Leray theorems for l -norms of inﬁnite chains. arXiv:2012.08690 (2020) 62. Ivanov, N.V.: Leray theorems in bounded cohomology theory. arXiv:2012.08038 (2020) 63. Ivanov, N.V., Turaev, V.G.: The canonical cocycle for the Euler class of a ﬂat vector bundle. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 265(3), 521–524 (1982) 64. Kan, D.M., Thurston, W.P.: Every connected space has the homology of a K(π, 1). Topology 15(3), 253–258 (1976) 65. Kastenholz, T., Reinhold, J.: Essentiality and simplicial volume of manifolds ﬁbered over spheres. arXiv:2107.05892 (2021) 66. Kim, R.: Every ﬁnite complex has the homology of some CAT(0) cubical duality group. Geometriae Dedicata 176, 1–9 (2015) 67. Kionke, S., Löh, C.: A note on p-adic simplicial volumes. Glasg. Math. J 63(3), 563–583 (2021) 68. Kock, J.: Frobenius algebras and 2D topological quantum ﬁeld theories. In: London Mathematical Society Student Texts, vol. 59. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004) 69. Lafont, J.F., Schmidt, B.: Simplicial volume of closed locally symmetric spaces of non-compact type. Acta Math. 197, 129–143 (2006) 70. Löh, C.: The Proportionality Principle of Simplicial Volume. Diploma Thesis, WWU Münster arXiv:math/0504106 (2004) 71. Löh, C.: -Homology and Simplicial Volume. Ph.D. Thesis, WWU Münster (2007). Available online at http:// nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-37549578216 72. Löh, C.: Rank gradient versus stable integral simplicial volume. Period. Math. Hung. 76, 88–94 (2018) 73. Löh, C.: Cost vs. stable integral simplicial volume. Groups. Geom. Dyn. 14(3), 899–916 (2020) 74. Löh, C.: Ergodic theoretic methods in group homology. In: Springer Briefs in Mathematics. Springer, 2020. A minicourse on L -Betti numbers in group theory 75. Löh, C.: Simplicial volume with F -coeﬃcients. Period. Math. Hung. 80, 38–58 (2020) 76. Löh, C., Moraschini, M.: Topological volumes of ﬁbrations: a note on open covers. To appear in Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A arXiv:2104.06038 (2021) 77. Löh, C., Moraschini, M., Sauer, R.: Amenable covers and integral foliated simplicial volume. To appear in New York J. Math. arXiv:2112.12223 (2021) 78. Löh, C., Pagliantini, C.: Integral foliated simplicial volume of hyperbolic 3-manifolds. Groups Geom. Dyn. 10, 825–865 (2016) 79. Löh, C., Sauer, R.: Bounded cohomology of amenable covers via classifying spaces. Enseign. Math. 66, 147–168 (2020) 80. Lück, W.: L -invariants: theory and applications to geometry and K-theory, volume 44 of Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics]. Springer, Berlin (2002) 81. Lück, W.: Survey on aspherical manifolds. In: European Congress of Mathematics, pp. 53–82. European Mathematical Society, Zürich (2010) 82. Matsumoto, S., Morita, S.: Bounded cohomology of certain groups of homeomorphisms. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 94(3), 539–544 (1985) 44 Page 36 of 36 Löh et al. Res Math Sci (2022) 9:44 83. Maunder, C.R.F.: A short proof of a theorem of Kan and Thurston. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. 13(4), 325–327 (1981) 84. Milnor, J.: On the existence of a connection with curvature zero. Comment. Math. Helv. 32, 215–223 (1958) 85. Milnor, J.W., Stasheﬀ, J.D.: Characteristic classes. In: Annals of Mathematics Studies, No. 76. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo (1974) 86. Mineyev, I.: Bounded cohomology characterizes hyperbolic groups. Q. J. Math. 53, 59–73 (2002) 87. Monod, N.: Lamplighters and the bounded cohomology of Thompson’s group. Geom. Funct. Anal. 32, 662–675 (2022) 88. Monod, N., Nariman, S.: Bounded and unbounded cohomology of homeomorphism and diﬀeomorphism groups. arXiv:2111.04365 (2021) 89. Moraschini, M., Raptis, G.: Amenability and acyclicity in bounded cohomology theory. arXiv:2105.02821 (2021) 90. Munkholm, H.J.: Simplices of maximal volume in hyperbolic space, Gromov’s norm, and Gromov’s proof of Mostow’s rigidity theorem (following Thurston). In: Topology Symposium, Siegen 1979 (Proceedings of a Symposium Held at the University of Siegen, Siegen, 1979), volume 788 of Lecture Notes in Mathematical, pp. 109–124. Springer, Berlin (1980) 91. Paternain, G., Petean, J.: Minimal entropy and collapsing with curvature bounded from below. Invent. Math. 151, 415–450 (2003) 92. Raptis, G.: Some characterizations of acyclic maps. J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 14(3), 773–785 (2019) 93. Raptis, G.: Bounded cohomology and homotopy colimits. arXiv:2103.15614 (2021) 94. Ratcliﬀe, J.G., Tschantz, S.T.: Some examples of aspherical 4-manifolds that are homology 4-spheres. Topology 44(2), 341–350 (2005) 95. Reinhart, B.L.: Cobordism and the Euler number. Topology 2, 173–177 (1963) 96. Rotman, J.J.: An Introduction to the Theory of Groups, Volume 148 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 4h edn. Springer, New York (1995) 97. Sauer, R.: Amenable covers, volume and L -Betti numbers of aspherical manifolds. J. Reine Angew. Math. 636, 47–92 (2009) 98. Schmidt, M.: L -Betti Numbers of R-Spaces and the Integral Foliated Simplicial Volume. Ph.D. Thesis, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 2005. Available online at http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:hbz:6-05699458563 99. Soma, T.: The Gromov invariant of links. Invent. Math. 64(3), 445–454 (1981) 100. Sullivan, D.: Inﬁnitesimal computations in topology. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. 47, 269–331 (1977, 1978) 101. Thurston, W.P.: The geometry and topology of 3-manifolds. In: Mimeographed Notes (1979) 102. Weinberger, S.: Computers, rigidity, and moduli. In: M.B. Porter Lectures. Princeton University Press, 2005. The large- scale fractal geometry of Riemannian moduli space 103. Wood, J.W.: Bundles with totally disconnected structure group. Comment. Math. Helv. 46, 257–273 (1971) 104. Yano, K.: Gromov invariant and S -actions. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 29(3), 493–501 (1982) Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional aﬃliations.
Research in the Mathematical Sciences – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 1, 2022
You can share this free article with as many people as you like with the url below! We hope you enjoy this feature!
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.