Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Ter‐Mikaelian, M. Korzukhin (1997)
Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree speciesForest Ecology and Management, 97
M. Dosskey (2002)
Setting Priorities for Research on Pollution Reduction Functions of Agricultural BuffersEnvironmental Management, 30
William Peterjohn, D. Correll (1984)
Nutrient dynamics in an agricultural watershed: Observations on the role of a riparian forestEcology, 65
A. Greenberg, R. Trussell, L. Clesceri (1988)
Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater : supplement to the sixteenth edition
(1992)
Wetlands: The management and restoration of switchcane Louisiana
J. Clausen, K. Guillard, C. Sigmund, K. Dors (2000)
Water Quality Changes from Riparian Buffer Restoration in ConnecticutJournal of Environmental Quality, 29
R. Lowrance, L. Altier, J. Newbold, Ronald Schnabel, P. Groffman, J. Denver, D. Correll, J. Gilliam, James Robinson, R. Brinsfield, K. Staver, W. Lucas, Albert Todd (1997)
Water Quality Functions of Riparian Forest Buffers in Chesapeake Bay WatershedsEnvironmental Management, 21
J. Schoonover, K. Williard, J. Zaczek, J. Mangun, A. Carver (2006)
Agricultural Sediment Reduction by Giant Cane and Forest Riparian BuffersWater, Air, and Soil Pollution, 169
M. Birkbeck
Letters from Illinois
(1998)
Stream Visual Assessment Protocol
L. Patty, B. Réal, J. Gril (1997)
The Use of Grassed Buffer Strips to Remove Pesticides, Nitrate and Soluble Phosphorus Compounds from Runoff WaterPesticide Science, 49
R. Young, Terry Huntrods, W. Anderson (1980)
Effectiveness of Vegetated Buffer Strips in Controlling Pollution from Feedlot RunoffJournal of Environmental Quality, 9
S. Platt, C. Brantley (1993)
Switchcane: propagation and establishment in the southeastern United StatesEcological Restoration, 11
J. Schoonover, K. Williard (2003)
GROUND WATER NITRATE REDUCTION IN GIANT CANE AND FOREST RIPARIAN BUFFER ZONES 1JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 39
Awwa, Wef (1999)
Standard Methods for the examination of water and wastewater
Lars Lowell (2018)
Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group 12-1988 Rapid Estimation of Coniferous Forest Leaf Area Index Using a Portable Integrating Radiometer
W. Magette, R. Brinsfield, R. Palmer, J. Wood (1989)
Nutrient and Sediment Removal by Vegetated Filter StipsTransactions of the ASABE, 32
D. Evans, J. White, L. Ensminger, F. Clark (1965)
METHODS OF SOIL ANALYSIS
L. Bharati, K.-H. Lee, T. Isenhart, R. Schultz (2002)
Soil-water infiltration under crops, pasture, and established riparian buffer in Midwestern USAAgroforestry Systems, 56
J. Uusi-Kämppä, B. Braskerud, H. Jansson, N. Syversen, Risto Uusitalo (2000)
Buffer zones and constructed wetlands as filters for agricultural phosphorus.Journal of Environmental Quality, 29
T. Schmitt, M. Dosskey, K. Hoagland (1999)
Filter strip performance and processes for different vegetation, widths, and contaminantsJournal of Environmental Quality, 28
R. Doyle, D. Wolf, D. Bezdicek (1975)
Effectiveness of forest buffer strips in improving the water quality of manure polluted runoff
S. Platt, C. Brantley, S. Carolina (1997)
Canebrakes: An Ecological and Historical Perspective
R. Lowrance, S. Dabney, R. Schultz (2002)
Improving water and soil quality with conservation buffersJournal of Soil and Water Conservation, 57
Kye-Han Lee, T. Isenhart, R. Schultz, S. Mickelson (2000)
Multispecies riparian buffers trap sediment and nutrients during rainfall simulations.Journal of Environmental Quality, 29
R. Daniels, J. Gilliam (1996)
Sediment and Chemical Load Reduction by Grass and Riparian FiltersSoil Science Society of America Journal, 60
N. Rabalais, R. Turner, W. Wiseman (2002)
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia, A.K.A. “The Dead Zone”Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 33
R. Udawatta, J. Krstansky, G. Henderson, H. Garrett (2002)
Agroforestry practices, runoff, and nutrient loss: a paired watershed comparison.Journal of environmental quality, 31 4
T. Dillaha, R. Reneau, S. Mostaghimi, D. Lee (1989)
Vegetative Filter Strips for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution ControlTransactions of the ASABE, 32
(1979)
Soil Survey of Union County, Illinois
L. Vought, J. Dahl, C. Pedersen, J. Lacoursière (1994)
Nutrient retention in riparian ecotonesAMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 23
M. Dosskey (2001)
Toward Quantifying Water Pollution Abatement in Response to Installing Buffers on Crop LandEnvironmental Management, 28
(1977)
Effectiveness of forest and grass buffer strips in improving the water quality of manure polluted runoff
C. Corley, G. Frasier, M. Trlica, F. Smith, E. Taylor (1999)
Technical note: nitrogen and phosphorus in runoff from 2 montane riparian communities.Journal of Range Management, 52
K. Lee, T. Isenhart, R. Schultz (2003)
Sediment and nutrient removal in an established multi-species riparian buffer.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 58
R. Vannote, G. Minshall, Kenneth Cummins, J. Sedell, Colbert Gushing (1980)
The River Continuum ConceptCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 37
J. Zaczek, A. Carver, K. Williard, J. Buchheit, J. Preece, J. Mangun (2003)
Sap sugar parameters of silver maple provenances and clones grown on upland and bottomland sites, 234
A. Fogle, D. Carey, B. Barfield, R. Blevins, V. Evangelou, C. Madison, S. Inamdar (1994)
IMPACT OF RIPARIAN GRASS FILTER STRIPS ON SURFACE-WATER QUALITY
Nutrients in overland flow from agricultural areas are a common cause of stream and lake water quality impairment. One method of reducing excess nutrient runoff from non-point sources is to restore or enhance existing riparian areas as vegetative buffers. A field scale study was conducted to assess the ability of remnant giant cane (Arundinaria gigantea (Walt.) Muhl.) and forest riparian buffer zones to attenuate nutrients in agricultural surface runoff from natural precipitation events. Two adjacent, 10.0 m wide riparian buffers were instrumented with 16 overland flow collectors to monitor surface runoff for nitrate, ammonium, and orthophosphate. Measurements were taken at 3.3 m increments within each buffer. The forest buffer significantly reduced incoming dissolved nitrate-N, dissolved ammonium-N, total ammonium-N, and total orthophosphate masses in surface runoff by 97, 74, 68, and 78 , respectively within the 10.0 m riparian buffer. Nutrient reductions within the cane buffer were 100 for all three nutrients due to relatively high infiltration rates. Significant reductions of total ammonium- N and total orthophosphate were detected by 3.3 m in the cane buffer and at 6.6 m in the forest buffer. Results suggest that both giant cane and forest vegetation are good candidates to incorporate into riparian buffer restoration designs for southern Illinois as well as in other regions within their native range with similar climatic and physiographic conditions.
Agroforestry Systems – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.