Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
E. Gaposchkin (1986)
Precision orbit computation in geodesy and geodynamics with KS variablesAdvances in Space Research, 6
Ashkan Shokri, J. Walker, A. Dijk, V. Pauwels (2019)
On the Use of Adaptive Ensemble Kalman Filtering to Mitigate Error Misspecifications in GRACE Data AssimilationWater Resources Research, 55
M. Berry, L. Healy (2004)
Implementation of Gauss-Jackson Integration for Orbit PropagationJournal of The Astronautical Sciences, 52
Gerhard Ströhmer (2004)
First Order Differential Equations and the AtmosphereThe College Mathematics Journal, 35
O. Meyer, B. Reichhoff, M. Schneider (2000)
Analytical theories of satellite motion constructed with a new package of formula manipulation and compared with numerical integrationCelestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 76
G. Panou, R. Korakitis (2018)
Geodesic equations and their numerical solution in Cartesian coordinates on a triaxial ellipsoidJournal of Geodetic Science, 9
J. Chiou, Shuen-De Wu (1999)
On the generation of higher order numerical integration methods using lower order Adams-Bashforth and Adams-Moulton methodsJournal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 108
Jean-Paul Berrut, L. Trefethen (2004)
Barycentric Lagrange InterpolationSIAM Rev., 46
P. Visser (2005)
Low-low satellite-to-satellite tracking: a comparison between analytical linear orbit perturbation theory and numerical integrationJournal of Geodesy, 79
G. Balmino (1974)
Coriolis forces in numerical integration of satellite orbits, and absolute reference systemCelestial mechanics, 10
D. Kahaner, C. Moler, S. Nash (1990)
Numerical methods and software
A. Miguel (2009)
Numerical integration of relativistic equations of motion for Earth satellitesCelestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 103
W. Kaula (1966)
Theory of satellite geodesy
T. Papanikolaou, D. Tsoulis (2016)
Assessment of numerical integration methods in the context of low Earth orbits and inter-satellite observation analysisActa Geodaetica et Geophysica, 51
Peiliang Xu (2016)
Measurement-based perturbation theory and differential equation parameter estimation with applications to satellite gravimetryCommun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., 59
O. Montenbruck, E. Gill (2000)
Satellite Orbits: Models, Methods and Applications
M. Abramowitz, I. Stegun, David Miller (1965)
Handbook of Mathematical Functions With Formulas, Graphs and Mathematical Tables (National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series No. 55)Journal of Applied Mechanics, 32
S. Mousavi, Hong Xiao, N. Sukumar (2010)
Generalized Gaussian quadrature rules on arbitrary polygonsInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 82
Peiliang Xu (2008)
Position and velocity perturbations for the determination of geopotential from space geodetic measurementsCelestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 100
T. Fukushima (2005)
Efficient orbit integration by orbital longitude methods
W. Guier (2015)
SATELLITE GEODESY
S. Julier, J. Uhlmann (2004)
Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimationProceedings of the IEEE, 92
B. Somodi, L. Földváry (2011)
Application of numerical integration techniques for orbit determination of state-of-the-art LEO satellitesPeriodica Polytechnica-civil Engineering, 55
D. Kincaid, W. Cheney (1991)
Numerical Analysis: Mathematics of Scientific Computing
In this paper a new method of numerically solving ordinary differential equations is presented. This method is based on the Gaussian numerical integration of different orders. Using two different orders for numerical integration, an adaptive method is derived. Any other numerical solver for ordinary differential equations can be used alongside this method. For instance, Runge–Kutta and Adams–Bashforth–Moulton methods are used together with this new adaptive method. This method is fast, stable, consistent, and suitable for very high accuracies. The accuracy of this method is always higher than the method used alongside with it. Two applications of this method are presented in the field of satellite geodesy. In the first application, for different time periods and sampling rates (increments of time), it is shown that the orbit determined by the new method is—with respect to the Keplerian motion—at least 6 and 25,000,000 times more accurate than, respectively, Runge–Kutta and Adams–Bashforth–Moulton methods of the same degree and absolute tolerance. In the second application, a real orbit propagation problem is discussed for the GRACE satellites. The orbit is propagated by the new numerical solver, using perturbed satellite motion equations up to degree 280. The results are compared with another independent method, the Unscented Kalman Filter. It is shown that the orbit propagated by the numerical solver is approximately 50 times more accurate than the one propagated by the Unscented Kalman Filter approach.
"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica" – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 13, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.