Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Anand Rao, M. Georgeff (1997)
Modeling Rational Agents within a BDI-Architecture
R. Schmidt, D. Tishkovsky (2002)
ON AXIOMATIC PRODUCTS OF PDL AND S5: SUBSTITUTION, TESTS AND KNOWLEDGE ⁄, 31
Joseph Halpern, Moshe Vardi (1989)
The Complexity of Reasoning about Knowledge and Time. I. Lower BoundsJ. Comput. Syst. Sci., 38
Tishkovsky / Multi-agent dynamic logics with informational test
M. Kracht (1995)
Highway to the Danger ZoneJ. Log. Comput., 5
R. Maddux (1980)
The equational theory of CA3 is undecidableJournal of Symbolic Logic, 45
R. Schmidt, D. Tishkovsky (2002)
Combining Dynamic Logic with Doxastic Modal Logics
W. Hoek (2001)
Logical Foundations of Agent-Based Computing
M. Wooldridge, N. Jennings (1995)
Intelligent agents: theory and practiceThe Knowledge Engineering Review, 10
C. Weel (1994)
TeamworkThe Lancet, 344
D. Gabbay, Agi Kurucz, F. Wolter, M. Zakharyaschev (2003)
Many-Dimensional Modal Logics: Theory and Applications
(1997)
Agent-Based Computing
R. Schmidt, D. Tishkovsky (2002)
Multi-agent Logics of Dynamic Belief and Knowledge
M. Zakharyaschev, F. Wolter, A. Chagrov (1996)
Advanced modal logicThe annual research report, 96
S. Kleene, M. Beeson (1952)
Introduction to Metamathematics
Bernhard Beckert, V. Klebanov, Steffen Schlager (2001)
Dynamic logicSIGACT News, 32
A. Herzig, Dominique Longin (2000)
Belief Dynamics in Cooperative DialoguesJ. Semant., 17
maarten marx (1999)
Complexity of Products of Modal LogicsJ. Log. Comput., 9
Joseph Halpern, Moshe Vardi (1986)
The complexity of reasoning about knowledge and time
A. Lomuscio, R. Meyden, M. Ryan (1999)
Knowledge in multiagent systems: initial configurations and broadcastArXiv, cs.LO/9909019
Nicholas Jennings, M. Wooldridge (1998)
Agent technology: foundations, applications, and markets
B. Linder, W. Hoek, J. Meyer (1994)
Tests as Epistemic Updates
A. Herzig, J. Lang, Thomas Polacsek (2000)
A modal logic for epistemic tests
M. Fischer, R. Ladner (1979)
Propositional Dynamic Logic of Regular ProgramsJ. Comput. Syst. Sci., 18
P. Blackburn, M. Rijke, Y. Venema (2001)
Modal Logic, 53
N. Jennings, M. Wooldridge (1998)
Applications of Agent Technology
Robert Moore (1984)
A Formal Theory of Knowledge and Action
Y. Venema (2002)
Dynamic Logic by David Harel, Dexter Kozen and Jerzy Tiuryn. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Hardback: ISBN 0–262–08289–6, $50, xv + 459 pagesTheory and Practice of Logic Programming, 2
Joseph Halpern, Y. Moses (1992)
A Guide to Completeness and Complexity for Modal Logics of Knowledge and BeliefArtif. Intell., 54
D. Gabbay, Agi Kurucz, F. Wolter, M. Zakharyaschev, Mark Reynolds (2005)
REVIEWS-Many-dimensional modal logics: Theory and applications
B. Linder, W. Hoek, J. Meyer (1998)
Formalising Abilities and Opportunities of AgentsFundam. Informaticae, 34
D. Gabbay, V. Shehtman (1998)
Products of Modal Logics, Part 1Log. J. IGPL, 6
J. Meyer, W. Hoek, B. Linder (1999)
A Logical Approach to the Dynamics of CommitmentsArtif. Intell., 113
Ronald Fagin (1995)
Reasoning about knowledge
Anand Rao (1995)
Decision Procedures for Propositional Linear-Time Belief-Desire-Intention Logics
A. Herzig, J. Lang, Dominique Longin, Thomas Polacsek (2000)
A Logic for Planning under Partial Observability
This paper investigates a family of logics for reasoning about the dynamic activities and informational attitudes of agents, namely the agents' beliefs and knowledge. The logics are based on a new formalisation and semantics of the test operator of propositional dynamic logic and a representation of actions which distinguishes abstract actions from concrete actions. The new test operator, called informational test, can be used to formalise the beliefs and knowledge of particular agents as dynamic modalities. This approach is consistent with the formalisation of the agents' beliefs and knowledge as K(D)45 and S5 modalities. Properties concerning informativeness, truthfulness and preservation of beliefs are proved for a derivative of the informational test operator. It is shown that common belief and common knowledge can be expressed in the considered logics. This means, the logics are more expressive than propositional dynamic logic with an extra modality for belief or knowledge. The logics remain decidable and belong to 2EXPTIME. Versions of the considered logics express natural additional properties of beliefs or knowledge and interaction of beliefs or knowledge with actions. It is shown that a simulation of PDL can be constructed in one of these extensions.
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 5, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.