Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Biagioli, P. Mariani, D. Tiscornia (1987)
Esplex: A rule and conceptual model for representing statutes
J. Ashley (1988)
Interaction of low-energy electrons with condensed matter: stopping powers and inelastic mean free paths from optical dataJournal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena, 46
L. T. McCarty (1987)
Intelligent Legal Information Systems: An Update. Law and ComputersThe Journal of the Law and Computers Association of Japan, 5
L. E. Allen, C. S. Saxon (1991)
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 53
Layman Allen, Charles Saxon (1991)
More IA needed in AI: interpretation assistance for coping with the problem of multiple structural interpretations
A. v.d. L. Gardener (1987)
An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Legal Reasoning
F. Haft, R. Jones, T. Wetter (1987)
A natural language based legal expert system for consultation and tutoring—the LEX project
H. Franken (1983)
Jurist en computer, 13
(1987)
Ces syst~mes dits experts, ou comment passer du droit, in InJbrmatique et droit: 20 ans
Trevor Bench-Capon (1989)
Deep models, normative reasoning and legal expert systems
(1989)
A Model to Model Knowledge About Knowledge
E. Rissland (1988)
Dimension-based analysis of hypotheticals from supreme court oral argument
Kevin Ashley (1989)
Toward a computational theory of arguing with precedents
G. J. Opdorp, R. F. Walker (1990)
Amongst Friends in Computers and Law, 279
R. D. Purdy (1989)
the Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 201
F. Hayes-Roth (1983)
Building expert systems, 1
(1990)
A Neural Network Approach to Open Texture
J. Breuker, B. Wielinga (1989)
Models of Expertise in Knowledge Acquisition, 5
(1987)
Intelligent Legal Information Systems: An Update
(1989)
Quality Assurance of Legal Expert Systems
Trevor Bench (1991)
Exploiting isomorphism: development of a KBS to support British coal insurance claims
(1986)
Expertsystemen en hun toepassing in het recht
(1989)
Tessec : een expert systeem voor de Algemene Bijstandswet
M. Sergot (1991)
The Representation of Law in Computer Programs: A Survey and Comparison
G. Greenleaf, Andrew Mowbray, Alan Tyree (1987)
Expert systems in law: The datalex project
D. H. Berman, C. Hafner (1987)
Yearbook of Law Computers and Technology. Volume 3
D. Kracht, J. Smits, M.C.M. Weusten (1988)
Advisory systems for legal questions
(1990)
Het ontwikkelen van juridische expertsystemen
M. Sergot, T. Cory, P. Hammond, R. Kowalski, F. Kriwaczek, F. Sadri (1986)
Formalisation of the British nationality actInternational Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 2
Jurix, Ronald Leenes, Jörgen Svensson
Legal knowledge based systems
Seth Goldman, M. Dyer, M. Flowers (1987)
Precedent-based legal reasoning and knowledge acquisition in contract law: A process model
(1990)
Criteria in the Juricas Project
D. Berman, C. Hafner (1987)
Indeterminacy: A challenge to logic‐based models of legal reasoningInternational Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 3
G. Greenleaf, Andrew Mowbray, Alan Tyree (1991)
The DataLex legal workstation: integrating tools for lawyers
A. Martino (1992)
Expert systems in law
D. Kracht, J. M. Smiths, M. C. M. Weusten (1988)
Five Articles on AI and Legal Expert Systems
H. Prakken, J. Schrickx (1991)
Legal Knowledge Based Systems, Legal Reasoning
D. Bourcier (1987)
Informatique et droit: 20 ans d'experience
L. Philipps (1986)
Using an Expert System in Testing Legal Rules
Marc Schauss (1987)
Systèmes experts et droit, 18
M. A. Nieuwenhuis (1987)
Constructie en instandhouding van een zuiver kennisbestand, Kennissystemenjaargang, 1
R. Walker, A. Oskamp, J. Schrickx, G. Opdorp, P. Berg (1991)
PROLEXS: Creating Law and Order in a Heterogeneous DomainInt. J. Man Mach. Stud., 35
A. Gardner (1989)
Representing developing legal doctrine
C. Hafner (1981)
An information retrieval system based on a computer model of legal knowledge
R. A. Guibourg, F. Socci Natali (1986)
Automated Analysis of Legal Texts, 69
(1988)
SystOmes experts et droit. Brussels: Story Scientia
A. Oskamp (1990)
Het ontwikkelen van juridische expertsystemen. Een theoretische beschouwing
(1991)
Isomorphic Models for Rules and Exceptions in Legislation
Martha Evens (1989)
Book Reviews: An Artificial Intelligence Approach to Legal Reasoning
(1992)
An Expert System Architecture for Heterogeneous Domains
L. Philipps (1986)
Automatic Analysis of Legal Texts, 703
A. Oskamp (1989)
Advanced Topics in Computer/law, 195
Kevin Ashley (1991)
Modeling legal argument - reasoning with cases and hypotheticals
K. D. Ashley (1988)
Ph.D. Dissertation
H. Prakken (1991)
A tool in modelling disagreement in law: preferring the most specific argument
Phillip Capper, R. Susskind (1988)
Latent Damage Law - the Expert System
Jon Ring (1987)
Designing text retrieval systems for conceptual searching
A. O., Rf Walker, Ja S&r&x, P. Berg (1989)
PROLEXS divide and rule: a legal application
R. Susskind (1989)
The latent damage system: a jurisprudential analysis
Roger Purdy (1989)
Knowledge and tools in building GRANDJUR 1.1
C. Noortwijk (1990)
Legal Knowledge Based Systems, an Overview of Criteria for Practical Validation and Use
(1987)
Constructie en instandhouding van een zuiver kennisbestand, Kennissystemen, jaargang 1, hr
R. F. Walker (1992)
Thesis Vrije Universiteit
M. Sergot (1991)
CHAPTER 1 – THE REPRESENTATION OF LAW IN COMPUTER PROGRAMS
D. Schlobohm, Stanford School, Greene, Maloney Radovsky, D. Waterman (1987)
Explanation for an expert system that performs estate planning
This paper presents a four layer model for working with legal knowledge in expert systems. It distinguishes five sources of knowledge. Four contain basic legal knowledge found in published and unpublished sources. The fifth consists of legal metaknowledge. In the model the four basic legal knowledge sources are placed at the lowest level. The metaknowledge is placed at levels above the other four knowledge sources. The assumption is that the knowledge is represented only once. The use of metaknowledge at various levels should make it possible to use the appropriate knowledge for the problem presented to the system. The knowledge has to be represented as closely to the original format as possible for this purpose. Suitable representation formalisms for the various types of knowledge in the five knowledge sources are discussed. It is not possible to indicate a ‘best’ representation formalism for each knowledge source.
Artificial Intelligence and Law – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 9, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.