Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Dani Goldberg, M. Matarić (2000)
Robust Behavior-Based Control for Distributed Multi-Robot Collection Tasks
E. Østergaard, G. Sukhatme, M. Matarić (2001)
Emergent bucket brigading: a simple mechanisms for improving performance in multi-robot constrained-space foraging tasks
(1993)
editor
O. Michel (1998)
Proc. of the First Int. Conf. on Virtual Worlds
Dani Goldberg, M. Matarić (1999)
Coordinating mobile robot group behavior using a model of interaction dynamics
O. Michel (1998)
Webots: Symbiosis Between Virtual and Real Mobile Robots
P. Maes, M. Matarić, Jean-Arcady Meyer, J. Pollack, Stewart Wilson (1996)
A Study of Territoriality: The Role of Critical Mass in Adaptive Task Division
Kristina Lerman, A. Galstyan, A. Martinoli, A. Ijspeert (2002)
A Macroscopic Analytical Model of Collaboration in Distributed Robotic SystemsArtificial Life, 7
R. Vaughan, K. Støy, G. Sukhatme, M. Matarić (2000)
Whistling in the dark: cooperative trail following in uncertain localization space
M. Matarić (1992)
Minimizing complexity in controlling a mobile robot populationProceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
K. Sugawara, M. Sano (1997)
Cooperative Acceleration of Task Performance: Foraging Behavior of Interacting Multi-Robots System
K. Sugawara, M. Sano, I. Yoshihara, K. Abe (1998)
Cooperative behavior of interacting robotsArtificial Life and Robotics, 2
M.S. Fontan, M.J. Matari? (1996)
From Animals to Animats 4: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior
A. Galstyan, Kristina Lerman (2001)
A Stochastic Model of Platoon Formation in Traffic Flow
(2000)
In Proceedings of the International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS'2000)
L. Parker (1998)
ALLIANCE: an architecture for fault tolerant multirobot cooperationIEEE Trans. Robotics Autom., 14
R. Vaughan, K. Støy, G. Sukhatme, M. Matarić (2000)
Blazing a Trail: Insect-inspired Resource Transportation by a Robot Team
Kristina Lerman, A. Galstyan (2001)
A General Methodology for Mathematical Analysis of Multi-Agent Systems
(1994)
Technical Report AITR-1465
A. Martinoli, A. Ijspeert, L. Gambardella (1999)
A Probabilistic Model for Understanding and Comparing Collective Aggregation Mechansims
O. Holland, C. Melhuish (1999)
Stigmergy, Self-Organization, and Sorting in Collective RoboticsArtificial Life, 5
Kristina Lerman, O. Shehory (2000)
Coalition formation for large-scale electronic marketsProceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems
R. Beckers, O.E. Holland, J.L. Deneubourg (1994)
Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems Artificial Life IV
R.T. Vaughan, K. Støy, G.S. Sukhatme, M.J. Matari? (2000)
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (AGENTS-00)
L. Parker (1994)
Heterogeneous multi-robot cooperation
A. Martinoli, A.J. Ijspeert, L.M. Gambardella (1999)
Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Advances in Artificial Life (ECAL-99)
Chisato Numaoka (1997)
Artificial Life and RoboticsJournal of the Robotics Society of Japan, 15
Elizabeth Nitz, R. Arkin, T. Balch (1993)
Communication of behavorial state in multi-agent retrieval tasks[1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation
R. Beckers, O. Holland, J. Deneubourg (2000)
From local actions to global tasks: stigmergy and collective roboticsArtificial Life
Brian Gerkey, R. Vaughan, K. Støy, A. Howard, G. Sukhatme, M. Matarić (2001)
Most valuable player: a robot device server for distributed controlProceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180), 3
In multi-robot applications, such as foraging or collection tasks, interference, which results from competition for space between spatially extended robots, can significantly affect the performance of the group. We present a mathematical model of foraging in a homogeneous multi-robot system, with the goal of understanding quantitatively the effects of interference. We examine two foraging scenarios: a simplified collection task where the robots only collect objects, and a foraging task, where they find objects and deliver them to some pre-specified “home” location. In the first case we find that the overall group performance improves as the system size grows; however, interference causes this improvement to be sublinear, and as a result, each robot's individual performance decreases as the group size increases. We also examine the full foraging task where robots collect objects and deliver them home. We find an optimal group size that maximizes group performance. For larger group sizes, the group performance declines. However, again due to the effects of interference, the individual robot's performance is a monotonically decreasing function of the group size. We validate both models by comparing their predictions to results of sensor-based simulations in a multi-robot system and find good agreement between theory and simulations data.
Autonomous Robots – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 10, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.