Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Wells, Eric Seelau (1995)
EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION: Psychological Research and Legal Policy on LineupsPsychology, Public Policy and Law, 1
Starkey Duncan, Robert Rosenthal (1968)
Vocal Emphasis in Experimenters' Instruction Reading as Unintended Determinant of Subjects' ResponsesLanguage and Speech, 11
G. Wells, M. Small, Steven Penrod, R. Malpass, Solomon Fulero, C. Brimacombe (1998)
Eyewitness Identification Procedures: Recommendations for Lineups and PhotospreadsLaw and Human Behavior, 22
John Copeland (1994)
Prophecies of power: Motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67
G. Wells, C. Luus (1990)
Police Lineups as ExperimentsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16
G. Wells, R. Lindsay, T. Ferguson (1979)
Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.The Journal of applied psychology, 64 4
M. S. Fanselow, R. F. Buckout (1976)
Nonverbal cueing as a source of biasing information in eyewitness identification testing
G. L. Wells, C. A. E. Luus (1990)
Police lineups as experiments: Social methodology as a framework for properly-constructed lineupsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16
G. Wells, Amy Bradfield (1998)
"Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience.Journal of Applied Psychology, 83
D. Elman, D. Schulte, A. Bukoff (1977)
Effects of facial expression and stare duration on walking speed: Two field experimentsEnvironmental psychology and nonverbal behavior, 2
Steve Ellyson, J. Dovidio (1985)
Power, Dominance, and Nonverbal Behavior
M. Argle (1975)
Bodily communication
P. Ekman (1992)
Facial Expressions of Emotion: New Findings, New QuestionsPsychological Science, 3
J. Burgoon, V. Manusov, Paul Mineo, Jerold Hale (1985)
Effects of gaze on hiring, credibility, attraction and relational message interpretationJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9
Michael Leippe (1980)
Effects of integrative memorial and cognitive processes on the correspondence of eyewitness accuracy and confidenceLaw and Human Behavior, 4
C. Luus, G. Wells (1994)
The malleability of eyewitness confidence: co-witness and perseverance effectsJournal of Applied Psychology, 79
C. Keating (1985)
Human Dominance Signals: The Primate in Us
Wilbur Brookover, R. Rosenthal, Lenore Jacobson (1968)
Pygmalion in the Classroom: Teacher Expectation and Pupils' Intellectual Development
Suzanne Troffer, C. Tart (1964)
Experimenter Bias in Hypnotist PerformanceScience, 145
Myra Sadker, David Sadker (1995)
Failing at fairness : how our schools cheat girls
G. Wells (1993)
What do we know about eyewitness identification?The American psychologist, 48 5
Susan Milmoe, Robert Rosenthal, H. Blane, Morris Chafetz, Irving Wolf (1967)
The doctor's voice: postdictor of successful referral of alcoholic patients.Journal of abnormal psychology, 72 1
G. L. Wells, T. J. Ferguson, R. C. L. Lindsay (1981)
The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of factJournal of Applied Psychology, 66
M. Phillips, B. McAuliff, M. Kovera, B. Cutler (1999)
Double-blind photoarray administration as a safeguard against investigator bias.Journal of Applied Psychology, 84
W. Mackey (1976)
Parameters of the Smile as a Social SignalJournal of Genetic Psychology, 129
G. Wells, Amy Bradfield (1999)
Distortions in Eyewitnesses' Recollections: Can the Postidentification-Feedback Effect Be Moderated?Psychological Science, 10
R. Rosenthal (1968)
Experimenter effects in behavioral research
B. DePaulo (1992)
Nonverbal behavior and self-presentation.Psychological bulletin, 111 2
This research focuses on how lineup a administrators influence eyewitnesses' postidentification confidence. What happens to witness confidence when a witness makes an identification that confirms the lineup administrator's expectations; what happens when this expectation is not confirmed? In Experiment 1, participant interviewers (n = 52) administered target-absent photo lineups to participant witnesses (n = 52). The interviewers did not view the simulated crime, but were told the thief's position in the lineup. In every instance this information was false (we used a target-absent lineup). A one-way ANOVA revealed that eyewitness identification confidence was malleable as a function of interviewers' beliefs about the thief's identity. In Experiment 2, participant jurors (n = 80) viewed 40 testimonies of Experiment 1 witnesses (2 participants viewed each testimony). Participant jurors judged all participant witnesses as equally credible despite their varying levels of postidentification confidence.
Law and Human Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 7, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.