Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Letters to the editor

Letters to the editor To the Editor: Arnold Mitchell has made an important contribution to the literature in his fine paper, "The Borderline Diagnosis and Integration of Self" (Am. J. Psychoanal., 45: 234-250, 1985), by placing the borderline diagnosis in holistic perspective. Mitchell's review and elucidation of the confusions and pitfalls surrounding the diagnosis hone in on questions that: merit fur- ther discussion. His paper prompted me to reflect on some of these. Mitchell implies in his "continuum of maladaptive defenses" that as a result of psychic conflict, we may move from relative health toward neu- rosis and then to borderline symptoms and defenses. He follows Homey in describing moves away from wholeness. Yet, if Homey were writing today, as a dialectical thinker, it's quite likely that she would accept the plausibil- ity of another process which occurs simultaneously, in the opposite direc- tion, toward integration, and would incorporate the work that has been done in this regard into her theory. Of course, Homey did just this in posit- ing constructive forces and the real self. But I am referring specifically now to developmental psychoanalysis, which Homey addresses indirectly: While we may start out whole and healthy, paradoxically, we cannot be all that http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The American Journal of Psychoanalysis Springer Journals

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/letters-to-the-editor-TABT0cF8lg

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
1986 Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis
ISSN
0002-9548
eISSN
1573-6741
DOI
10.1007/BF01255508
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

To the Editor: Arnold Mitchell has made an important contribution to the literature in his fine paper, "The Borderline Diagnosis and Integration of Self" (Am. J. Psychoanal., 45: 234-250, 1985), by placing the borderline diagnosis in holistic perspective. Mitchell's review and elucidation of the confusions and pitfalls surrounding the diagnosis hone in on questions that: merit fur- ther discussion. His paper prompted me to reflect on some of these. Mitchell implies in his "continuum of maladaptive defenses" that as a result of psychic conflict, we may move from relative health toward neu- rosis and then to borderline symptoms and defenses. He follows Homey in describing moves away from wholeness. Yet, if Homey were writing today, as a dialectical thinker, it's quite likely that she would accept the plausibil- ity of another process which occurs simultaneously, in the opposite direc- tion, toward integration, and would incorporate the work that has been done in this regard into her theory. Of course, Homey did just this in posit- ing constructive forces and the real self. But I am referring specifically now to developmental psychoanalysis, which Homey addresses indirectly: While we may start out whole and healthy, paradoxically, we cannot be all that

Journal

The American Journal of PsychoanalysisSpringer Journals

Published: Jun 1, 1986

Keywords: Clinical Psychology; Psychotherapy; Psychoanalysis

There are no references for this article.