Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
George Vossos, John Zeleznikow, Allan Moore, D. Hunter (1993)
The Credit Act Advisory System (CAAS): conversion from an expert system prototype to a C++ commercial system
(1995)
Incorporating Inductive Case Based Reasoning into an Object Oriented Deductive Legal Knowledge Based System
A. Stranieri, John Zeleznikow, J. Yearwood (2001)
Argumentation structures that integrate dialectical and non-dialectical reasoningThe Knowledge Engineering Review, 16
H. Prakken, A. Muntjewerff, A. Soeteman, Mr Mestdagh, D. Hunter
Legal knowledge based systems
D. Hunter (1994)
In Legal Knowledge Based Systems: The Relation with Legal Theory
D. Berman, C. Hafner (1989)
The potential of artificial intelligence to help solve the crisis in our legal systemCommun. ACM, 32
John Zeleznikow (1994)
Building intelligent legal information systems
M. Sergot, F. Sadri, R. Kowalski, F. Kriwaczek, P. Hammond, H. Cory (1986)
The British Nationality Act as a logic programCommun. ACM, 29
John Zeleznikow, George Vossos, D. Hunter (1993)
The IKBALS project: Multi-modal reasoning in legal knowledge based systemsArtificial Intelligence and Law, 2
(1998)
Automating Legal Reasoning in Discretionary Domains
A. Stranieri, John Zeleznikow (2002)
WebShell: The development of web based expert systems
Artificial Intelligence and Law 10: 7–17, 2002. Letters from colleagues remembering Don in a personal way For me it is hard to believe that Don is not still with us, for my own personal images of him are so vibrant and his influence on our field is so strong, it is hard to believe otherwise. I suspect – and hope – that it will ever be so. One of my earliest meetings with Don was in the fall of 1985, while I was spend- ing a sabbatical at Harvard Law School as a Lecturer, and teaching my seminar on AI and Legal Reasoning for the first time. I remember a soft autumn afternoon and sitting at an outside table at some typical bistro in Harvard Square, perhaps the old Casablanca, with him and Carole and talking about the possibilities for AI and Law. I remember us all boisterously discussing, amongst other things, legal rules, rule-based reasoning, case-based reasoning, legal realism, and the Constitution, and finding that we shared so much – for instance, a skepticism of rules – that we really couldn’t force ourselves into true adversarial positions. That is not to say we didn’t enjoy arguing about them
Artificial Intelligence and Law – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 10, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.