Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Soeteman (2003)
Do we need a legal logic
P. McNamara (2006)
Deontic logic
S. Smoliar, D. Hofstadter (1980)
Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid@@@Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden BraidPerspectives of New Music, 19
A. Soeteman (1995)
Formal aspects of Legal reasoningArgumentation, 9
C. Perelman (1963)
Justice et raison
(1970)
Le Champs de l'Argumentation. Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles: Bruxelles
J. Carlos (2001)
Why is Legal Reasoning Defeasible
6 The capitals here are propositional constants, they do not represent arbitrary propositions, but just and only the propositions which are expressed in (1)
A. Soeteman (1989)
Logic in Law
S. E. Toulmin (1958)
The Uses of Argument
R. Summers (1963)
LOGIC IN THE LAWMind
(593)
The Dutch High Court had to decide this case in December 1990: HR 7-12
S. Smoliar, D. Hofstadter (1979)
Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden BraidComputer Music Journal, 5
J. Hage (2001)
Legal Logic Its Existence, Nature and Use
G. Kalinowski (1972)
La logique des normes
H. Prakken (1997)
Logical Tools for Modelling Legal Argument
C. Perelman, L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1958)
La Nouvelle Rhétorique: Traitéde l'Argumentation
C. Perelman (1970)
Le Champs de l'Argumentation
J. Ruytinx (1971)
Ch. Perelman, Le champ de l'argumentation, Presses Universitaires de Bruxelles, Travaux de la Faculté de Philosophie et Lettres de l'Université Libre de Bruxelles, Tome XLIII, 1970.
(1997)
256), who argues that his system formalises Toulmin's ideas on the structure of argument
J. C. Hage (2001)
Pluralism in Law
V. Goldschmidt (1958)
28. Perelman (Ch.) et Olbrechts-Tyteca (L.). La nouvelle rhétorique ; Traité de l'Argumentation (Coll. Logos). Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 1958, 71
A. Soeteman (2003)
Festskrift till Ake Frändberg
3 In propositional logic the connectives (see footnote 2), in predicate logic 'all' and 'some', in deontic logic the deontic operators
In this paper the thesis is argued that there is no need for a special legal logic to deal with the defeasibility of legal arguments. An important argument for this thesis is that legal judgements ask for a complete justification and that such a complete justification requires a deductively valid argument.
Artificial Intelligence and Law – Springer Journals
Published: Nov 7, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.