Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Strathman, F. Gleicher, D. Boninger, C. Edwards (1994)
The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66
F. Niarhos, D. Routh (1992)
The Role of Clinical Assessment in the Juvenile Court: Predictors of Juvenile Dispositions and RecidivismJournal of Clinical Child Psychology, 21
T. Grisso (2003)
Forensic Evaluation in Delinquency Cases
T. Grisso (1998)
Forensic evaluation of juveniles
E. Mulvey, L. Steinberg, J. Fagan, E. Cauffman, A. Piquero, L. Chassin, G. Knight, Robert Brame, Carol Schubert, T. Hecker, Sandra Losoya (2004)
Theory and Research on Desistance from Antisocial Activity among Serious Adolescent OffendersYouth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2
R. Hoge, D. Andrews, A. Leschied (1995)
Investigation of variables associated with probation and custody dispositions in a sample of juvenilesJournal of Clinical Child Psychology, 24
J. Henretta, C. Frazier, D. Bishop (1986)
The Effect of Prior Case Outcomes on Juvenile Justice Decision-MakingSocial Forces, 65
R. Kessler, T. Üstün (2004)
The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI)International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13
S. Brodsky (1980)
Criminal Justice and BehaviorCriminal Justice and Behavior, 7
M. Campbell, F. Schmidt (2000)
Comparison of Mental Health and Legal Factors in the Disposition Outcome of Young OffendersCriminal Justice and Behavior, 27
R. Sampson, J. Laub (1993)
Structural variations in Juvenile Court processing: Inequality, the underclass, and social controlLaw & Society Review, 27
R. Kessler, P. Berglund, Olga Demler, R. Jin, K. Merikangas, E. Walters (2005)
Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication.Archives of general psychiatry, 62 6
Robin Stryker, Ilene Nagel, J. Hagan (1983)
Methodological Issues in Court ResearchSociological Methods & Research, 11
L. Steinberg, E. Cauffman (1996)
Maturity of judgment in adolescence: Psychosocial factors in adolescent decision makingLaw and Human Behavior, 20
P. Torbet, L. Szymanski (1998)
State legislative responses to violent juvenile crime: 1996–97 update. Juvenile Justice Bulletin, November 1998
A. Farrell, S. Danish (1993)
Peer drug associations and emotional restraint: causes or consequences of adolescents' drug use?Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 61 2
C. Frazier, D. Bishop, J. Henretta (1992)
THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF RACE DIFFERENTIALS IN JUVENILE JUSTICE DISPOSITIONSSociological Quarterly, 33
M. Stouthamer-Loeber, Evelyn Wei, R. Loeber, Ann Mastenb (2004)
Desistance from persistent serious delinquency in the transition to adulthoodDevelopment and Psychopathology, 16
Barry Feld (1999)
Bad Kids: Race and the Transformation of the Juvenile Court
B. Horvath, M. Weber, Max Rheinstein, E. Shils (1956)
On Law in Economy and SocietyAmerican Journal of Comparative Law, 5
Leona Lee (1996)
PREDICTORS OF JUVENILE COURT DISPOSITIONSJournal of Criminal Justice, 19
R. Kueneman, R. Linden (1983)
Current issues in juvenile justice
Roy Flemming, P. Nardulli, James Eisenstein (1993)
The Craft of Justice: Politics and Work in Criminal Court Communities
R. Josselson, E. Greenberger, D. McConochie (1975)
On the validity of the psychosocial maturity inventory: Relationship to measures of personal well-being
D. Weinberger, G. Schwartz (1990)
Distress and restraint as superordinate dimensions of self-reported adjustment: a typological perspective.Journal of personality, 58 2
P. Carrington, S. Moyer (1995)
Factors affecting custodial dispositions under the Young Offenders ActCanadian Journal of Criminology-revue Canadienne De Criminologie, 37
C. Slobogin (1999)
Treating kids right: Deconstructing and reconstructing the amenability to treatment conceptJournal of Contemporary Legal Issues, 10
M. B. First, R. L. Spitzer, M. Gibbon, J. B. W. Williams (2002)
Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, non-patient edition (SCID-I/NP)
L. Steinberg, E. Cauffman (1999)
A developmental perspective on serious juvenile crime: When should juveniles be treated as adults?Federal Probation, 63
L. Steinberg, N. Mounts, S. Lamborn, S. Dornbusch (1991)
Authoritative parenting and adolescent adjustment across various ecological nichesJournal of Research on Adolescence, 1
R. Stryker, I. H. Nagel, J. Hagan (1983)
Methodological issues in court research: Pre-trial release decision for federal defendantsSociological Methods in Research, 11
Jr. Sanborn (1996)
Factors Perceived to Affect Delinquent Dispositions in Juvenile Court: Putting the Sentencing Decision into ContextCrime & Delinquency, 42
R. Kessler, J. Abelson, Olga Demler, J. Escobar, M. Gibbon, Margaret Guyer, M. Howes, R. Jin, W. Vega, E. Walters, Philip Wang, A. Zaslavsky, Hui Zheng (2004)
Clinical calibration of DSM‐IV diagnoses in the World Mental Health (WMH) version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH‐CIDI)International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13
M. Weber (1954)
Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society
Lawrence Cohen, J. Kluegel (1978)
Determinants of Juvenile Court Dispositions: Ascriptive and Achieved Factors in Two Metropolitan CourtsAmerican Sociological Review, 43
E. Cauffman (2004)
A statewide screening of mental health symptoms among juvenile offenders in detention.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43 4
A. Horwitz, M. Wasserman (1980)
Formal rationality, substantive justice, and discriminationLaw and Human Behavior, 4
L. Derogatis, N. Melisaratos (1983)
The Brief Symptom Inventory: an introductory reportPsychological Medicine, 13
C. Britt (2000)
Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisionsJustice Quarterly, 17
A. Farrell, T. Sullivan (2000)
Structure of the Weinberger Adjustment Inventory Self-Restraint scale and its relation to problem behaviors in adolescence.Psychological assessment, 12 4
(1999)
Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence
D. Weinberger (1996)
Distorted self-perceptions: divergent self-reports as statistical outliers in the multimethod assessment of children's social-emotional adjustment.Journal of personality assessment, 66 1
P. Frick (1998)
Conduct Disorders and Severe Antisocial Behavior
E. Scott, D. Reppucci, Jennifer Woolard (1995)
Evaluating adolescent decision making in legal contextsLaw and Human Behavior, 19
E. Greenberger, R. Josselson, Claramae Knerr, B. Knerr (1975)
The measurement and structure of psychosocial maturityJournal of Youth and Adolescence, 4
J. Fagan, F. Zimring (2000)
The Changing Borders of Juvenile Justice: Transfer of Adolescents to the Criminal Court
David Miller, James Byrnes (2001)
Adolescents' decision making in social situations: A self-regulation perspectiveJournal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 22
C. Thomas, Robin Cage (1977)
The Effect of Social Characteristics on Juvenile Court DispositionsSociological Quarterly, 18
R. Kueneman, R. Linden, R. Kosmick (1992)
Juvenile justice in rural and northern ManitobaCanadian Journal of Criminology, 34
Patricia Torbet, Linda Szymanski (1998)
State Legislative Responses to Violent Juvenile Crime: 1996-97 Update. Juvenile Justice Bulletin.
F. Zimring (1998)
American Youth Violence
Martin Haskell, L. Yablonsky (1975)
Crime and Delinquency
R. Stubblefield (1966)
Behavioral sciences and the law.The American journal of orthopsychiatry, 36 5
C. Phillips, S. Dinitz (1982)
Labelling and Juvenile Court Dispositions: Official Responses to a Cohort of Violent JuvenilesSociological Quarterly, 23
A. Horwitz, M. Wasserman (1980)
Formal rationality, substantive justice, and discrimination: A study of juvenile courtLaw and Human Behavior, 4
Carol Schubert, E. Mulvey, L. Steinberg, E. Cauffman, Sandra Losoya, T. Hecker, L. Chassin, G. Knight (2004)
Operational Lessons from the Pathways to Desistance ProjectYouth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2
Vaughan Stapleton, David Aday, Jeanne Ito (1982)
An Empirical Typology of American Metropolitan Juvenile CourtsAmerican Journal of Sociology, 88
Cindy Cottle, R. Lee, K. Heilbrun (2001)
The Prediction of Criminal Recidivism in JuvenilesCriminal Justice and Behavior, 28
T. Thornberry, R. Christenson (1984)
Juvenile Justice Decision-Making as a Longitudinal ProcessSocial Forces, 63
D. Bishop, C. Frazier (1996)
Race Effects in Juvenile Justice Decision-Making: Findings of a Statewide AnalysisJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 86
G. Tarr, James Eisenstein, Roy Flemming, P. Nardulli (1991)
The contours of justice: Communities and their courtsAmerican Political Science Review, 85
P. Connell (1980)
Juvenile justice in the year 2005Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 9
T. Grisso, R. Barnum, K. Fletcher, E. Cauffman, Dawn Peuschold (2001)
Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument for mental health needs of juvenile justice youths.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40 5
B. Benda (2003)
Survival Analysis of Criminal Recidivism of Boot Camp Graduates Using Elements From General and Developmental Explanatory ModelsInternational Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47
P. G. Zimbardo (1990)
The stanford time perspective inventory
I. Marshall, C. Thomas (1983)
Discretionary Decision-Making and the Juvenile CourtJuvenile and Family Court Journal, 34
M. Scheier, C. Carver (2009)
Optimism, coping, and health: assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association, 4 3
A. Farrell, S. Danish, Catherine Howard (1992)
Relationship between drug use and other problem behaviors in urban adolescents.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 60 5
L. Steinberg, Elizabeth Scott (2003)
Less guilty by reason of adolescence: developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, and the juvenile death penalty.The American psychologist, 58 12
E. Cauffman, L. Steinberg (2000)
(Im)maturity of judgment in adolescence: why adolescents may be less culpable than adults.Behavioral sciences & the law, 18 6
J. Ainsworth (1991)
Re-imagining Childhood and Reconstructing the Legal Order: The Case for Abolishing the Juvenile CourtNorth Carolina Law Review, 69
E. Mulvey, L. Steinberg, J. Fagan, E. Cauffman, A. Piquero, L. Chassin, G. Knight, R. Brame, C. Schubert, T. Hecker, S. Losoya (2004)
Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among adolescent serious offendersJournal of Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2
J. Mccord, C. Widom, N. Crowell (2001)
Juvenile crime, juvenile justice
Barry Feld (1991)
Justice by Geography: Urban, Suburban, and Rural Variations in Juvenile Justice AdministrationJournal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 82
Historically, the juvenile court has been expected to consider each youth’s distinct rehabilitative needs in the dispositional decision-making process, rather than focusing on legal factors alone. This study examines the extent to which demographic, psychological, contextual, and legal factors, independently predict dispositional outcomes (i.e., probation vs. confinement) within two juvenile court jurisdictions (Philadelphia, Phoenix). The sample consists of 1,355 14- to 18-year-old male and female juvenile offenders adjudicated of a serious criminal offense. Results suggest that legal factors have the strongest influence on disposition in both jurisdictions. For example, a higher number of prior court referrals is associated with an increased likelihood of secure confinement in both jurisdictions. Juveniles adjudicated of violent offenses are more likely to receive secure confinement in Phoenix, but are more likely to be placed on probation in Philadelphia. Race is unrelated to dispositional outcome, but, males are consistently more likely than females to be placed in secure confinement. Importantly, individual factors (e.g., developmental maturity) generally were not powerful independent predictors of disposition. Finally, an examination of the predictors of juvenile versus adult court transfer in Phoenix indicated that males, older juveniles, and those with a violent adjudicated charge were more likely to be transferred to adult court, while juveniles scoring high on responsibility as well as those juveniles with an alcohol dependence diagnosis were more likely to be retained in juvenile court.
Law and Human Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 24, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.