Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
AA Wilson (1991)
Browse agroforestry using honeylocustFor Chron, 67
JW Johnson, JH Fike, WB Fike (2012)
Millwood and wild-type honeylocust seedpod nutritive value changes over winterCrop Sci, 52
JE Moore, MH Brant, WE Kunkle, DI Hopkins (1999)
Effects of supplementation on voluntary forage intake, diet digestibility, and animal performanceJ Anim Sci, 77
AG Fannon, JH Fike, SP Greiner (2017)
Hair sheep performance in a mid-stage deciduous Appalachian silvopastureAgroforest Syst
SH Sharrow, D Brauer, TR Clason (2009)
American agroforestry: an integrated science and practice
CH Lin, RL Mcgraw, MF George, HE Garrett (2001)
Nutritive quality and morphological development under partial shade of some forage species with agroforestry potentialAgroforest Syst, 53
MA Gold, JW Hanover (1993)
Honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos), a multi-purpose tree for the temperate zoneThe Int Tree Crops J, 7
RL Kallenbach, MS Kerley, GJ Bishop-Hurley (2006)
Cumulative forage production, forage quality and livestock performance from an annual ryegrass and cereal rye mixture in a Pine Walnut SilvopastureAgroforest Syst, 66
R Foroughbakhch, C Dupraz, J Hernandez-Pinero (2006)
In vivo and in situ digestibility of dry matter and crude protein of honeylocust pods (Gleditsia triacanthos L.)J Applied Anim Res, 30
JW Johnson, JH Fike, WB Fike (2013)
Millwood honeylocust trees: seedpod nutritive value and yield characteristicsAgroforest Syst, 87
JF Stritzke, LI Croy, WE McMurphy (1976)
Effect of shade and fertility on NO3-N accumulation, carbohydrate content, and dry matter production of tall fescueAgron J, 68
JPS Neel, DP Belesky (2017)
Herbage production, nutritive value and animal productivity within hardwood silvopasture, open and mixed pasture systems in Appalachia, United StatesGrass Forage Sci, 72
TW Loy, JC MacDonald, TJ Klopfenstein, GE Erickson (2007)
Effects of distillers grains or corb supplementation frequency on forage intake and digestibilityJ Anim Sci, 85
RM Dixon, CR Stockdale (1999)
Associative effects between forages and grains: consequences for feed utilisationCrop Pasture Sci, 50
B Macoon, LE Sollenberger, JE Moore (2003)
Comparison of three techniques for estimating the forage intake of lactating dairy cows on pastureJ Dairy Sci, 81
L Brokaw, BW Hess, DC Rule (2001)
Supplemental soybean oil or corn for beef heifers grazing summer pastures: effects on forage intake, ruminal fermentation, and site and extent of digestionJ Anim Sci, 79
(2007)
Nutrient requirements of small ruminants: sheep, goats, cervids, and new world camelids
RM Kaplan, JM Burke, TH Terrill (2004)
Validation of the FAMACHA (C) eye color chart for detecting clinical anemia in sheep and goats on farms in the southern United StatesVet Parisitol, 123
Trees in silvopastures can provide forage-livestock systems with multiple goods and services, including shade, shelter, and browse, but the provision of browse has received little exploration in temperate systems. Honeylocust trees (Gleditsia triacanthos) produce nutritious pods that could serve as supplemental fodder for livestock grazing stockpiled tall fescue (Schedonorus arundinaceus). This study compared lamb performance in honeylocust (cv. Millwood) and black walnut (Juglans nigra) silvopastures with productivity on open pastures during a six week winter grazing trial. Treatment pastures were rotationally stocked with three (walnut) or six (honeylocust and open) lambs per experimental unit based on forage availability. Lambs were naïve to pods and did not readily consume the fodder until four weeks into the trial. Forage availability did not differ (P = 0.7580) between honeylocust silvopastures and open pastures (mean = 5090 ± 90 kg ha−1) but was greater (P < 0.0001) than forage availability in the black walnut silvopastures (3790 ± 90 kg ha−1). Average daily gains did not differ (P = 0.3763) among treatments over the six weeks of study. However, lambs within the honeylocust silvopastures began consuming pods at about week four of the study and had greater (P = 0.0251) average daily gains in the final period (0.12 ± 0.02 kg day−1) than lambs within the open pastures (0 ± 0.02 kg day−1). These data suggest that honeylocust pods may support greater lamb weight gains, but previous exposure and longer study periods may be necessary to see their nutritional benefit when grazing high quality forages.
Agroforestry Systems – Springer Journals
Published: Jun 16, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.