Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Hage (1996)
A theory of legal reasoning and a logic to matchAI & Law, 4
J. Hage (1996)
A theory of legal reasoning and a logic to matchArtificial Intelligence and Law, 4
G. Sartor (1994)
A Formal Model of Legal ArgumentationRatio Juris, 7
K. Larenz (1960)
Methodenlehre der RechtswissenschaftAmerican Journal of Comparative Law, 10
Michele Taruffo (1975)
La motivazione della sentenza civile
(1997)
Logic and argumentation in legal reasoning', Current Legal Theory 25
H. Prakken, G. Sartor (1996)
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoningArtificial Intelligence and Law, 4
D. Maccormick, R. Summers (1991)
Interpreting Statutes: A Comparative Study
Cyrus Tata (2004)
The Application of Judicial Intelligence and 'Rules' to Systems Supporting Discretionary Judicial Decision-MakingArtificial Intelligence and Law, 6
H. Prakken, G. Sartor (1996)
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoningAI & Law, 4
(1992)
La prova dei fatti giuridici. Nozioni generali. Milano: Giuffrè
R.A. Kowalski, F. Toni (1996)
Abstract ArgumentationAI & Law, 4
K. Freeman, A. Farley (1996)
A model of argumentation and its application to legal reasoningArtificial Intelligence and Law, 4
H. Prakken, G. Sartor (2004)
Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue GameArtificial Intelligence and Law, 6
J. Rödig (1969)
Die Denkform der Alternative in der Jurisprudenz
R. Kowalski, Francesca Toni (1994)
On isomorphic formalisationsArtificial Intelligence and Law, 4
K. Freeman, A.M. Farley (1996)
A model of argumentation and its application to legal reasoningAI & Law, 4
Raimo Siltala (1993)
Interpreting Statutes. A Comparative StudyRatio Juris, 6
Peter Clark (1991)
A model of argumentation and its application in a cooperative expert system
A. Pecezenik (1996)
Jumps and logic in the lawAI & Law, 4
A. Peczenik (1996)
Jumps and logic in the lawArtificial Intelligence and Law, 4
U. Schild (2004)
Criminal Sentencing and Intelligent Decision SupportArtificial Intelligence and Law, 6
(1997)
Automatic Judicial Document Drafting: A Unification-Based Approach
Michelino Taruffo (1994)
Involvement and Detachment in the Presentation of Evidence
George Christie (1986)
An Essay on DiscretionDuke Law Journal, 35
(1992)
1992)La prova dei fatti giuridici. Nozioni generali
P. Leith (2004)
The Judge and the Computer: How Best 'Decision Support'?Artificial Intelligence and Law, 6
312 MICHELE TARUFFO be considered as the relatively best approximation to the reality of decision-making in modern legal systems. (a) There is no need, however, to choose a whole theory of judicial decision among the pre-existing and “ready made” theories and to assume it once forever as valid in all its details. Rather, it may be useful just to stress some basic points drawing them from the best theories available. One of these points is that the judicial decision can and should be considered as a set of choices among alter- native hypotheses of possible decisions (see Roedig, 1969; Taruffo, 1975). The basic idea is that from the very beginning of a judicial process, and then all along its development, several possible “projects” or “drafts” of decision are submitted to the court by the parties, and some other may be built up by the court itself. Every party alleges her own “version” of the case (or even more than one version) and – correspondingly – she proposes a hypothesis (and sometimes more than one hypothesis) for the final decision of the case. When it is vested with such a power, the court may alternatively find out a further hypothesis
Artificial Intelligence and Law – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 16, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.