Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Cumulative learning in PBL 463
J. Bransford, Marcia Johnson (1972)
Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recallJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11
W. Grave, H. Boshuizen, H. Schmidt (1996)
Problem based learning: Cognitive and metacognitive processes during problem analysisInstructional Science, 24
W. Grave, H. Schmidt, H. Boshuizen (2001)
Effects of problem-based discussion on studying a subsequent text: A randomized trial among first year medical studentsInstructional Science, 29
J. Michael (2006)
Where's the evidence that active learning works?Advances in physiology education, 30 4
T. Hak, P. Maguire (2000)
Group Process: The Black Box of Studies on Problem‐based LearningAcademic Medicine, 75
Li-tze Hu, P. Bentler (1999)
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling, 6
HS Barrows (1996)
New directions for teaching and learning (Vol. 68)
(1990)
Towards a causal model of student learning within the context of a problem-based curriculumInnovation in medical education. An evaluation of its present status
Astrid Visschers-Pleijers, D. Dolmans, I. Wolfhagen, C. Vleuten (2004)
Exploration of a method to analyze group interactions in problem-based learningMedical Teacher, 26
D. Dolmans, H. Schmidt (2006)
What Do We Know About Cognitive and Motivational Effects of Small Group Tutorials in Problem-Based Learning?Advances in Health Sciences Education, 11
(1993)
Alternative ways of assessing model fitTesting structural equation models
R. Driver, Hilary Asoko, J. Leach, P. Scott, E. Mortimer (1994)
Constructing Scientific Knowledge in the ClassroomEducational Researcher, 23
CC Bonwell, JA Eison (1991)
Creating excitement in the classroom
W. Kintsch, T. Dijk (1978)
Toward a model of text comprehension and production.Psychological Review, 85
R. Klatzky, J. Cotton (1978)
Semantic factors in cognition
Titus Geerligs (1994)
Students' thoughts during problem-based small-group discussionsInstructional Science, 22
(Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2010). What students learn in problem-based learning: A process analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.)
Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2010). What students learn in problem-based learning: A process analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2010). What students learn in problem-based learning: A process analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication., Yew, E. H. J., & Schmidt, H. G. (2010). What students learn in problem-based learning: A process analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
(1985)
Prose analysis: Purposes, procedures, and problemsAnalyzing and understanding expository text (pp. 11–64, 269–304)
D. Rumelhart, D. Norman (1976)
Accretion, tuning and restructuring: Three modes of learning
H. Schmidt, M. Volder, W. Grave, J. Moust, V. Patel (1989)
Explanatory Models in the Processing of Science Text: The Role of Prior Knowledge Activation Through Small-Group DiscussionJournal of Educational Psychology, 81
Dorothy Evensen, C. Hmelo, C. Hmelo‐Silver (2000)
Problem-based Learning: A Research Perspective on Learning Interactions
M. Prince (2004)
Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the ResearchJournal of Engineering Education, 93
L. Uden, C. Beaumont (2006)
The Tutorial Process
Debra Linton, Jan Farmer, E. Peterson (2006)
Where ' s the evidence that active learning works ?
K. Clase, Peggy Ertmer (2012)
Goals and Strategies of a Problem Based Learning Facilitator
C. Hmelo‐Silver (2004)
Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?Educational Psychology Review, 16
H. Schmidt, H. Molen, W. Winkel, W. Wijnen (2009)
Constructivist, Problem-Based Learning Does Work: A Meta-Analysis of Curricular Comparisons Involving a Single Medical SchoolEducational Psychologist, 44
P. Cobb (1994)
Where Is the Mind? Constructivist and Sociocultural Perspectives on Mathematical DevelopmentEducational Researcher, 23
K. Bollen, J. Long (1993)
Testing Structural Equation Models
(2006)
Amos 7.0 user's guide
H. Schmidt (1983)
Problem‐based learning: rationale and descriptionMedical Education, 17
R. Glaser, M. Bassok (1989)
Learning Theory and the Study of InstructionAnnual Review of Psychology, 40
(Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 195–200.)
Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 195–200.Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 195–200., Gallagher, S. A., Stepien, W. J., & Rosenthal, H. (1992). The effects of problem-based learning on problem solving. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 195–200.
B. Zimmerman (2002)
Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An OverviewTheory Into Practice, 41
H. Barrows (1986)
A taxonomy of problem‐based learning methodsMedical Education, 20
Dorothy Evensen, C. Hmelo, C. Hmelo‐Silver (2000)
Factors Affecting Small-Group Tutorial Learning: A Review of Research
M. Browne, R. Cudeck (1992)
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model FitSociological Methods & Research, 21
M. Hurk, D. Dolmans, I. Wolfhagen, C. Vleuten (2001)
Testing a Causal Model for Learning in a Problem-based CurriculumAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 6
Allan Collins, M. Quillian (1969)
Retrieval time from semantic memory
Astrid Visschers-Pleijers, D. Dolmans, Bas Leng, I. Wolfhagen, C. Vleuten (2006)
Analysis of verbal interactions in tutorial groups: a process studyMedical Education, 40
Annemarie Palincsar (1998)
Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning.Annual review of psychology, 49
J. Kolodner, P. Camp, D. Crismond, B. Fasse, Jackie Gray, J. Holbrook, S. Puntambekar, Mike Ryan (2003)
Problem-Based Learning Meets Case-Based Reasoning in the Middle-School Science Classroom: Putting Learning by Design(tm) Into PracticeJournal of the Learning Sciences, 12
(Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12.)
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12.Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12., Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23, 5–12.
H. Barrows (1996)
Problem‐based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overviewNew Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996
B. Zimmerman (1990)
Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: An OverviewEducational Psychologist, 25
Elaine Yew, H. Schmidt (2009)
Evidence for constructive, self-regulatory, and collaborative processes in problem-based learningAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 14
C. Hmelo‐Silver, H. Barrows (2008)
Facilitating Collaborative Knowledge BuildingCognition and Instruction, 26
Ulrich Schiefele, A. Krapp (1996)
Topic interest and free recall of expository text.Learning and Individual Differences, 8
WH Gijselaers, HG Schmidt (1990)
Innovation in medical education. An evaluation of its present status
(1990)
Towards a causal model of student learning within the context of a problem-based curriculum Innovation in medical education. An evaluation of its present status
Shelagh Gallagher, William Stepien, Hilary Rosenthal (1992)
The Effects of Problem-Based Learning On Problem SolvingGifted Child Quarterly, 36
Elaine Yew, H. Schmidt (2012)
What students learn in problem-based learning: a process analysisInstructional Science, 40
BJF Meyer (1985)
Analyzing and understanding expository text (pp. 11–64, 269–304)
Problem-based learning (PBL) is generally organized in three phases, involving collaborative and self-directed learning processes. The hypothesis tested here is whether learning in the different phases of PBL is cumulative, with learning in each phase depending on that of the previous phase. The scientific concepts recalled by 218 students at the end of each PBL phase were used to estimate the extent of students’ learning. The data were then analyzed using structural equation modeling. Results show that our hypothesized model fits the data well. Alternative hypotheses according to which achievement is predicted either by collaborative learning alone or by self-directed learning alone did not fit the data. We conclude that the learning in each PBL phase is cumulative, and strongly influenced by the earlier phase, thus providing support for the PBL cycle of problem analysis, self-directed learning, and a subsequent reporting phase. We also demonstrate an efficient method to capture and quantify students’ learning during the PBL process.
Advances in Health Sciences Education – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 16, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.