Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Merriam (1998)
Qualitative research and case study applications in education
I. Holloway (2008)
A-Z of qualitative research in healthcare
M. Murtagh, J. Hepworth (2003)
Feminist ethics and menopause: autonomy and decision-making in primary medical care.Social science & medicine, 56 8
J. Ziman (2000)
Real science: What it is, what it means
R. Schutz (1969)
5: Methodological Issues In Curriculum ResearchReview of Educational Research, 39
Lois Sayrs (1996)
Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewingEvaluation and Program Planning, 3
R. Jaeger, L. Shulman (1988)
Complementary Methods for Research in Education
N. Mays, C. Pope (2000)
Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative researchBritish Medical Journal, 320
D. Sackett, D. Cook (1993)
Users' guides to the medical literature.JAMA, 270 17
J. Bligh, Julie Brice (2005)
New Year reflections on professionalismMedical Education, 39
N. Britten (2005)
Making sense of qualitative research: a new seriesMedical Education, 39
J. Fleury, Sarah Lee, B. Matteson, M. Belyea (2004)
Barriers to physical activity maintenance after cardiac rehabilitation.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation, 24 5
D. Wasylenki, N. Byrne, B. McRobb (1997)
The social contract challenge in medical educationMedical Education, 31
B. Latour (2004)
Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of ConcernCritical Inquiry, 30
G. McCracken (1988)
The long interview. Qualitative research methods series 13
N. Mays, C. Pope (2000)
Assessing quality in qualitative researchBMJ : British Medical Journal, 320
V. Neuféld, R. Maudsley, R. Pickering, J. Turnbull, W. Weston, M. Brown, J. Simpson (1998)
Educating future physicians for OntarioAcademic Medicine, 73
LEES. Shulman (1981)
Disciplines of Inquiry in Education: An OverviewEducational Researcher, 10
G. Ritzer, E. Guba (1990)
The Paradigm dialogCanadian Journal of Sociology-cahiers Canadiens De Sociologie, 16
U. Kreicbergs, U. Valdimarsdóttir, E. Onelöv, J. Henter, G. Steineck (2004)
Talking about death with children who have severe malignant disease.The New England journal of medicine, 351 12
Grant Mccracken (1988)
The long interview
M. Skolnik (1989)
How Academic Program Review Can Foster Intellectual Conformity and Stifle Diversity of Thought and MethodThe Journal of Higher Education, 60
Catherine Pope, N. Mays (1999)
Qualitative Research in Health Care
(2000)
Real Science: Academic science
M. Giacomini, Deborah Cook (2000)
Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.JAMA, 284 3
N. Denzin, Y. Lincoln (1994)
Handbook of Qualitative ResearchBritish Journal of Educational Studies, 42
S. Bloom (1989)
The medical school as a social organization: the sources of resistance to change †Medical Education, 23
(2000)
Users’ guides to the medical literature XXIII. Qualitative research in healthcare. A. Are the results of the study valid?Journal of the American Medical Association, 284
D. F. Walker (1992)
Handbook of research on curriculum
This study examined the degree of acceptance of qualitative research by medical trainees and physicians, and explored the causes for any differences in their support of qualitative versus quantitative research. Thirty-two individuals at four levels of medical training were studied. Eight philosophers of science served for construct validation. After completing a questionnaire, participants were interviewed using a semi-structured procedure. Transcriptions of the interviews were coded for emergent themes. Coding consensus was achieved via iterative discussion. When asked to categorize 10 projects, participants on average ranked quantitative science projects as “more scientific” than those using qualitative methodologies. Although participants appeared largely unaware of the principles underlying qualitative methodologies, most expressed the belief that qualitative data was more biased and less objective than quantitative data. Prior qualitative research experience was the major predictor of acceptance of qualitative research. Participants’ acceptance of interpretivistic or positivistic paradigms also influenced what type of science they felt was acceptable. Their level of training did not correlate with the acceptance of qualitative methodologies. On average, participants in our study favoured quantitative methodologies over qualitative methodologies. We postulate that this preference is due to their unawareness of the principles and paradigms underlying the methodologies.
Advances in Health Sciences Education – Springer Journals
Published: Jul 5, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.