Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Halicka, P. Ogrodnik, Bartosz Zegardło (2013)
Using ceramic sanitary ware waste as concrete aggregateConstruction and Building Materials, 48
(2009)
Guidelines for concrete mix design proportioning (CED 2: cement and concrete)
S. Lakshmikanth, M. Nataraja, Supreeth (2022)
Performance of High-Strength Concrete using Alccofine and GGBFSJournal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 103
S. Siddique, S. Chaudhary, S. Shrivastava, T. Gupta (2019)
Sustainable utilisation of ceramic waste in concrete: Exposure to adverse conditionsJournal of Cleaner Production
(1963)
Method of test for aggregate for concrete . Part III - specific gravity density voids absorption and bulking
ACI Committee 363 (1999)
391
C. Medina, M. Rojas, M. Frías (2013)
Properties of recycled ceramic aggregate concretes: Water resistanceCement & Concrete Composites, 40
Hassan Magbool (2021)
Utilisation of ceramic waste aggregate and its effect on Eco-friendly concrete: A reviewJournal of Building Engineering
M. Hanafi, A. Ekinci, E. Aydin (2020)
Triple-Binder-Stabilized Marine Deposit Clay for Better SustainabilitySustainability
F. Pacheco-Torgal, S. Jalali (2011)
Compressive strength and durability properties of ceramic wastes based concreteMaterials and Structures, 44
(2022)
Medical speciality enzymes market size, share, growth, trends, report 2022-2030Focus on Catalysts
(1999)
State-of-the-art report on highstrength concrete (ACI 318-99) and commentary
(1999)
UPV and RM tests 12. IS:516 (Part I, Sec. 1) (2021) Hardened concrete-methods of test
M. Nataraja, S. Tejas, Rohit Kulkarni (2022)
Characteristics of crushed and alternative fine aggregates based on flow, shear and impact behaviourIndian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences
C. Medina, M. Rojas, M. Frías (2012)
Reuse of sanitary ceramic wastes as coarse aggregate in eco-efficient concretesCement & Concrete Composites, 34
M. Nataraja, M. Shivakumara, Vibha Dalawai (2022)
Effect of design parameters on the proportioning of mass concrete using fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slagMaterials Today: Proceedings
E. Aydin, H. Arel (2019)
High-volume marble substitution in cement-paste: Towards a better sustainabilityJournal of Cleaner Production
F. Pacheco-Torgal, S. Jalali (2010)
Reusing ceramic wastes in concreteConstruction and Building Materials, 24
R. Senthamarai, P. Manoharan (2005)
Concrete with ceramic waste aggregateCement & Concrete Composites, 27
(2000)
Concrete plain and reinforced
Presently it has become an inevitable option for engineers and builders to adopt alternative construction materials for concrete production. Different types of processed wastes are recommended by IS 383-2016 for use in concrete as aggregate such as slag aggregates, C and D waste and recycled concrete aggregates. At present in India, it is a common scenario that lots are broken vitrified tiles are found unused in the production and application sites and are dumped into the city outskirts, leading to environmental pollution. From the point of view of effective utilization of these potential tile wastes in concrete, this research was undertaken to address several issues of concrete mix proportioning and its characterization. Two grades of concrete namely M25 and M40 are designed as per IS: 10262-2019 and the mix proportions are presented with granite and vitrified tile as coarse aggregates. One complete mix design using conventional granite aggregate, considering trial mixes, is demonstrated using 50% ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBFS) to explore the complete potential of the code. The effect of vitrified tile aggregates in various proportions namely 20%, 40% and 60% on various properties of concretes are also studied for one trial mix in both M25 and M40 grades. The various tests conducted are slump and compaction factor tests, compressive, split and flexural strength tests, rebound hammer and UPV tests, water absorption and rapid chloride permeability tests and abrasion test. From the test results it can be seen that the proposed method of mix design can be easily extended to vitrified tile aggregates and results obtained are found to be satisfactory. From the test results it is found that the performance of concrete with tile aggregates is comparable and practically acceptable. Finally, it can be concluded that about 20 to 60% of vitrified tiles can be used as an alternative to conventional aggregates ensuring satisfactory performance.
Journal of Building Pathology and Rehabilitation – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2022
Keywords: Concrete mix proportioning; Vitrified tile aggregates; Fresh and hardened properties; Rebound hammer and UPV tests; Abrasion test; RCPT
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.