Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
G. Wells (2008)
Field Experiments on Eyewitness Identification: Towards a Better Understanding of Pitfalls and ProspectsLaw and Human Behavior, 32
Jonathan Crawshaw (1993)
A Look ForwardInternational Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 5
Sheri Mecklenburg, Patricia Bailey, M. Larson (2008)
The Illinois Field Study: A Significant Contribution to Understanding Real World Eyewitness Identification IssuesLaw and Human Behavior, 32
D. Schacter, R. Dawes, L. Jacoby, D. Kahneman, Richard Lempert, H. Roediger, R. Rosenthal (2008)
Studying eyewitness investigations in the fieldLaw and Human Behavior, 32
N. Steblay (2008)
Commentary on “Studying Eyewitness Investigations in the Field”: A Look ForwardLaw and Human Behavior, 32
S. Ross, R. Malpass (2008)
Moving Forward: Response to “Studying Eyewitness Investigations in the Field”Law and Human Behavior, 32
Law Hum Behav (2008) 32:1–2 DOI 10.1007/s10979-007-9120-x IN TROD UCTIO N Introduction to Commentaries on the Illinois Pilot Study of Lineup Reforms Brian L. Cutler Æ Margaret Bull Kovera Published online: 14 December 2007 American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychological Association 2007 Between 2000 and 2002, the Illinois Commission on been the subject of attention at several conferences and Capital Punishment, appointed by then-Governor George multiple publications on the web and in print. Indeed, the Ryan, reviewed the justice procedures that lead to capital report has generated sufficient attention that Dr. Margaret punishment with the objective of identifying reforms that Bull Kovera, Associate Editor, and I decided to devote a enhance the system’s fairness and accuracy. The Com- portion of LHB journal space to a forum for commentaries mission issued its report in 2002. In recognition of the about the Illinois field study and Illinois Pilot Report potential role of mistaken identification in erroneous con- (Mecklenburg 2006). viction, this report included six recommendations This section begins with a commentary (Schacter et al. concerning eyewitness identification procedures, several of this issue) co-authored by seven distinguished psycholo- which have since become law (see Mecklenburg 2006 for gists convened by
Law and Human Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 14, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.