Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Intentions versus unintended discursive consequences: reflections upon Sherbino et al.’s commentary on “Flower Power”

Intentions versus unintended discursive consequences: reflections upon Sherbino et al.’s... Adv in Health Sci Educ (2011) 16:699–701 DOI 10.1007/s10459-011-9337-9 COMME NTARY Intentions versus unintended discursive consequences: reflections upon Sherbino et al.’s commentary on ‘‘Flower Power’’ • • Cynthia R. Whitehead Zubin Austin Brian D. Hodges Received: 25 October 2011 / Accepted: 25 October 2011 / Published online: 22 November 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 We welcome the comments by Sherbino et al. on behalf of the CanMEDS Clinical Edu- cators of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) on our article ‘‘Flower Power: the armoured expert in the CanMEDS competency framework?’’ We appreciate the authors’ interest, and thank the editor of Advances in Health Sciences Education for the opportunity to respond. First, we wish to express our strong agreement with Sherbino et al. in terms of the importance and impact that CanMEDS has had on medical education specifically, and health professions education more generally. CanMEDS’ explicit naming and valuing of aspects of physician competence beyond biomedical expertise is critical to understanding the complex set of attributes necessary to be a good doctor. Each of us has had significant involvement with the CanMEDS Framework; BH in the Framework’s inception, CW in explication and implementation of CanMEDS-FM http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Advances in Health Sciences Education Springer Journals

Intentions versus unintended discursive consequences: reflections upon Sherbino et al.’s commentary on “Flower Power”

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/intentions-versus-unintended-discursive-consequences-reflections-upon-2TvFfZ2nit

References (14)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
Subject
Education; Medical Education
ISSN
1382-4996
eISSN
1573-1677
DOI
10.1007/s10459-011-9337-9
pmid
22105306
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Adv in Health Sci Educ (2011) 16:699–701 DOI 10.1007/s10459-011-9337-9 COMME NTARY Intentions versus unintended discursive consequences: reflections upon Sherbino et al.’s commentary on ‘‘Flower Power’’ • • Cynthia R. Whitehead Zubin Austin Brian D. Hodges Received: 25 October 2011 / Accepted: 25 October 2011 / Published online: 22 November 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 We welcome the comments by Sherbino et al. on behalf of the CanMEDS Clinical Edu- cators of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) on our article ‘‘Flower Power: the armoured expert in the CanMEDS competency framework?’’ We appreciate the authors’ interest, and thank the editor of Advances in Health Sciences Education for the opportunity to respond. First, we wish to express our strong agreement with Sherbino et al. in terms of the importance and impact that CanMEDS has had on medical education specifically, and health professions education more generally. CanMEDS’ explicit naming and valuing of aspects of physician competence beyond biomedical expertise is critical to understanding the complex set of attributes necessary to be a good doctor. Each of us has had significant involvement with the CanMEDS Framework; BH in the Framework’s inception, CW in explication and implementation of CanMEDS-FM

Journal

Advances in Health Sciences EducationSpringer Journals

Published: Nov 22, 2011

There are no references for this article.