Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Deutsch, W. Murphy (1955)
The clinical interview
P. Jensen, H. Watanabe, J. Richters (1999)
Who's Up First? Testing for Order Effects in Structured Interviews Using a Counterbalanced Experimental DesignJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27
P. Jensen, M. Roper, P. Fisher, John Piacentini, G. Canino, J. Richters, M. Rubio‐Stipec, M. Dulcan, S. Goodman, M. Davies, D. Rae, D. Shaffer, H. Bird, B. Lahey, M. Schwab-Stone (1995)
Test-retest reliability of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.1). Parent, child, and combined algorithms.Archives of general psychiatry, 52 1
L. Robins (1985)
Epidemiology: reflections on testing the validity of psychiatric interviews.Archives of general psychiatry, 42 9
M. Kovacs (1986)
Depression in young people
J. Werry, R. Sprague (1974)
Methylphenidate in Children—Effect of Dosage*Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 8
C. Edelbrock, A. Costello, M. Dulcan, R. Kalas, N. Conover (1985)
Age differences in the reliability of the psychiatric interview of the child.Child development, 56 1
H. Bird, M. Schwab-Stone, H. Andrews (1996)
Global measures of impairment for epidemiological and clinician use with children and adolescentsJournal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 6
J. McLeod, J. Turnbull, R. Kessler, J. Abelson (1990)
Sources of discrepancy in the comparison of a lay-administered diagnostic instrument with clinical diagnosisPsychiatry Research, 31
D. Shaffer, P. Fisher, M. Dulcan, M. Davies, J. Piacentini, M. Schwab-Stone, B. Lahey, K. Bourdon, P. Jensen, H. Bird, G. Canino, D. Regier (1996)
The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3): Description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA studyJournal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35
J. Young, J. O'brien, E. Gutterman, P. Cohen (1987)
Research on the clinical interview.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26 5
D. Shaffer, P. Fisher, M. Dulcan, M. Davies, John Piacentini, M. Schwab-Stone, B. Lahey, Karen Bourdon, P. Jensen, H. Bird, G. Canino, D. Regier (1996)
The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3): description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA Study. Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders Study.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35 7
R. Roberts, B. Solovitz, Y. Chen, C. Casat (1996)
Retest stability of DSM-III-R diagnoses among adolescents using the diagnostic interview schedule for children (DISC-2.1C)Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 24
C. Edelbrock, K. Crnic, Amy Bohnert (1999)
Interviewing as Communication: An Alternative Way of Administering the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for ChildrenJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27
K. Hodges, J. Cools, D. McKnew (1989)
Test-retest reliability of a clinical research instrument for children: The Child Assessment SchedulePsychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 4
E. Loftus, K. Smith, M. Klinger, J. Fiedler (1994)
Questions about questions
R. Milich, M. Roberts, J. Loney, J. Caputo (1980)
Differentiating practice effects and statistical regression on the conners hyperkinesis indexJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 8
P. Jensen, M. Roper, P. Fisher, J. Piacentini, G. Canino, J. Richters, M. Rubio-Stipec, M. Dulcan, S. Goodman, M. Davies, D. Rae, D. Shaffer, H. Bird, B. Lahey, M. Schwab-Stone (1995)
Test-retest reliability of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.1)Archives of General Psychiatry, 52
M. Schwab-Stone, P. Fisher, John Piacentini, D. Shaffer, M. Davies, M. Briggs (1993)
The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised Version (DISC-R): II. Test-retest reliability.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32 3
M. Schwab-Stone, D. Shaffer, M. Dulcan, P. Jensen, P. Fisher, H. Bird, S. Goodman, B. Lahey, J. Lichtman, G. Canino, M. Rubio‐Stipec, D. Rae (1996)
Criterion validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3).Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35 7
William Bumberry, J. Oliver, J. McClure (1978)
Validation of the Beck Depression Inventory in a university population using psychiatric estimate as the criterion.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46
H. Bird, D. Shaffer, P. Fisher, M. Gould (1993)
The Columbia Impairment Scale (CIS): Pilot findings on a measure of global impairment for children and adolescents.International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research
C. Lucas, P. Fisher, J. Piacentini, Haiying Zhang, P. Jensen, D. Shaffer, M. Dulcan, M. Schwab-Stone, D. Regier, G. Canino (1999)
Features of Interview Questions Associated with Attenuation of Symptom ReportsJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27
T. Fallon, M. Schwab-Stone (1994)
Determinants of reliability in psychiatric surveys of children aged 6-12.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines, 35 8
B. Lahey, E. Flagg, H. Bird, M. Schwab-Stone, G. Canino, M. Dulcan, P. Leaf, M. Davies, Donna Brogan, Karen Bourdon, S. Horwitz, M. Rubio‐Stipec, D. Freeman, J. Lichtman, D. Shaffer, S. Goodman, W. Narrow, Myrna Weissman, D. Kandel, P. Jensen, J. Richters, D. Regier (1996)
The NIMH Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) Study: background and methodology.Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35 7
Informant-related determinants of item attenuation, that is, the drop-off in symptom endorsement rates at retest, were examined in an enriched community subsample of 245 parent–child pairs drawn from the National Institute of Mental Health Methods for Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders Study. Youngsters and their parents were interviewed with the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (Version 2.3; DISC-2.3) on two occasions with a mean test–retest interval of 12 days. Item attenuation rates were high for both informants, with adults failing to confirm 42% and children 58% of baseline responses at retest. Stepwise regressions revealed that item attenuation at DISC-P retest was higher for adult informants who were younger, and who reported on older and less impaired children. On the DISC-C, attenuation was higher for children who were less impaired, rated as doing worse in school, and who had a longer test–retest interval. These results are broadly consistent with past studies examining the determinants of attenuation and test–retest reliability and have implications for the design and use of structured diagnostic instruments.
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 30, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.