Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Mathevon (1996)
What Parameters Can Be Used for Individual Acoustic Recognition by the Greater Flamingo?C.R. Acad. Sci., 319
K. Frommolt, M. Goltsman, D. Macdonald (2003)
Barking foxes, Alopex lagopus: field experiments in individual recognition in a territorial mammalAnimal Behaviour, 65
T. Lengagne, J. Lauga, P. Jouventin (1997)
A method of independent time and frequency decomposition of bioacoustic signals: inter-individual recognition in four species of penguins.Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie, 320 11
Hervé Mulard, T. Aubin, Joël White, S. Hatch, E. Danchin (2008)
Experimental evidence of vocal recognition in young and adult black-legged kittiwakesAnimal Behaviour, 76
A. Searby, P. Jouventin (2004)
How to measure information carried by a modulated vocal signature?The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116 5
T. Lengagne, J. Lauga, T. Aubin (2001)
Intra-syllabic acoustic signatures used by the king penguin in parent-chick recognition: an experimental approach.The Journal of experimental biology, 204 Pt 4
N. Mathevon, I. Charrier, P. Jouventin (2003)
Potential for individual recognition in acoustic signals: a comparative study of two gulls with different nesting patterns.Comptes rendus biologies, 326 3
R. Griffiths, M. Double, Kate Orr, R. Dawson (1998)
A DNA test to sex most birdsMolecular Ecology, 7
L. Hardouin, P. Tabel, V. Bretagnolle (2006)
Neighbour–stranger discrimination in the little owl, Athene noctuaAnimal Behaviour, 72
T. Aubin, P. Jouventin, C. Hildebrand (2000)
Penguins use the two–voice system to recognize each otherProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267
I.L. Jones, N.B. Konyukhov, J.C. Williams, G.V. Byrd (2001)
Parakeet Auklet (Aethia psittacula)
I. Jones, J. Falls, A. Gaston (1987)
Vocal recognition between parents and young of ancient murrelets, Synthliboramphus antiquus (Aves: Alcidae)Animal Behaviour, 35
E. Briefer, T. Aubin, K. Lehongre, F. Rybak (2008)
How to identify dear enemies: the group signature in the complex song of the skylark Alauda arvensisJournal of Experimental Biology, 211
P. Robisson, T. Aubin, J. Brémond (2010)
Individuality in the voice of the emperor penguin Aptenodytes forsteri: adaptation to a noisy environmentEthology, 94
S. Seneviratne, I. Jones, E. Miller (2009)
Vocal Repertoires of Auklets (Alcidae: Aethiini): Structural Organization and Categorization, 121
I.L. Jones, J.B. Fails, A.J. Gaston (1987)
Vocal Recognition between Parents and Young of Ancient Murrelets, Synthliboramphus antiquus (Aves: Alcidae)Arum. Behav., 35
V.A. Zubakin, I.A. Volodin, A.V. Klenova, E.V. Zubakina, E.V. Volodina, E.N. Lapshina (2010)
The Behavior of Crested Auklet (Aethia cristatella, Charadriiformes, Alcidae) during the Breeding Season: The Motor and Acoustic DemonstrationsZool. Zh., 89
T. Aubin, N. Mathevon, V. Staszewski, T. Boulinier (2007)
Acoustic communication in the Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla: potential cues for sexual and individual signatures in long callsPolar Biology, 30
A.J. Gaston, I.L. Jones (1998)
The Auks
S.P. Kharitonov (2007)
Metody i teoreticheskie aspekty issledovaniya morskikh ptits: Mater. V Vseros. shkoly po morskoi biologii
S.J. Insley, R. Paredes, I.L. Jones (2003)
Sex Differences in Razorbill Aha torda Parent-Offspring Vocal RecognitionJ. Anim. Ecol., 206
Anil Kumar (2003)
Acoustic communication in birdsResonance, 8
J. Huxley, A. Hardy, E. Ford (1958)
Evolution as a Process
N.B. Konyukhov (1990)
Ptitsy SSSR. Chistikovye
M. Beecher (1989)
Signalling systems for individual recognition: an information theory approachAnimal Behaviour, 38
T. Lengagne, J. Lauga, P. Jouventin (1997)
A Method of Independent Time and Frequency Decomposition of Bioacoustic Signals: Inter-Individual Recognition in Four Species of PenguinsC.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, 320
E. Briefer, T. Aubin, K. Lehongre, F. Rybak (2008)
How to Identify Dear Enemies: The Group Signature in the Complex Song of the Skylark Alauda arvensisJ. Anim. Ecol., 211
P. Bateson (1976)
Perspectives in Ethology: Volume 2
N. Mathevon (1996)
What parameters can be used for individual acoustic recognition by the greater flamingo?Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie, 319 1
T. Aubin, P. Jouventin (2002)
How to vocally identify kin in a crowd: The penguin modelAdvances in The Study of Behavior, 31
M.J. Owren, D. Rendall (1997)
Perspectives in Ethology, Vol. 12: Communication
S. Baird, John Cassin, G. Lawrence (1974)
The birds of North America
I. Charrier, P. Jouventin, N. Mathevon, T. Aubin (2001)
Individual identity coding depends on call type in the South Polar skua Catharacta maccormickiPolar Biology, 24
Thierry Lengagne, Thierry Aubin, Jacques Lauga, P. Jouventin (1999)
How do king penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus apply the mathematical theory of information to communicate in windy conditions?Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 266
A. Solow (1990)
A Randomization Test for Misclassification Probability in Discriminant AnalysisEcology, 71
M. Beecher, I. Beecher, Shari Hahn (1981)
Parent-offspring recognition in bank swallows (Riparia riparia): II. Development and acoustic basisAnimal Behaviour, 29
S. Insley, Rosana Paredes, I. Jones (2003)
Sex differences in razorbill Alca torda parent—offspring vocal recognitionJournal of Experimental Biology, 206
Crested auklet is a unique representative of the family Alcidae with a complex social behavior nesting in dense colonies with a size of up to one million individuals. Here we study specific individual features in their trumpet calls, loud vocalizations used by auklets as an advertising display. In 2008 and 2009, we recorded 231 calls of 24 individually marked male crested auklets from the Talan Island (Sea of Okhotsk). According to a stepwise discriminant function analysis based on seven variables in the call introduction, the rate of correct call assignment to an individual was 84.8% and that in the case of seven variables of the main part of the call was 82.3%, which considerably exceeds a random classification. Thus, a single introduction or a single main part of the call is sufficient for a reliable individual identification of a calling bird. We assume that such redundancy of information for individual recognition can enhance identification of calls of a large number of auklet conspecifics in dense colonies with a nesting density of several tens of pairs per 1 m2.
Moscow University Biological Sciences Bulletin – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 15, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.