Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Scott (2003)
Measurable Cardinals and Constructible Sets
A. Kanamori (1978)
On Vopěnka's and Related Principles*Studies in logic and the foundations of mathematics, 96
K. Kuratowski, J. Groszkowski, C. Kanafojski, W. Nowacki, B. Stefanowski, W. Szymanowski, W. Zenczykowski (1953)
BULLETIN DE L'ACADEMIE POLONAISE DES SCIENCES
J. Cummings (2010)
Iterated Forcing and Elementary Embeddings
(1994)
Locally presentable and accessible categories, London Mathematical Society
S.D. Friedman (2000)
Fine Structure and Class Forcing, de Gruyter Series in Logic and Its Applications, vol. 3
E-mail : Andrew.Brooke-Taylor@bristol.ac
M. Gitik, S. Shelah (1989)
On certain indestructibility of strong cardinals and a question of HajnalArchive for Mathematical Logic, 28
(1983)
Iterated forcing, Surveys in set theory, London Mathematical Society
A. Levy (1965)
A hierarchy of formulas in set theoryMemoirs of the American Mathematical Society
J. Cummings, M. Foreman, M. Magidor (2001)
Squares, scales and stationary ReflectionJ. Math. Log., 1
Arthur Apter (2002)
Strong Cardinals can be Fully Laver IndestructibleMath. Log. Q., 48
Arthur Apter, G. Sargsyan (2010)
An equiconsistency for universal indestructibilityThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 75
J. Cummings, E. Schimmerling (2002)
Indexed squaresIsrael Journal of Mathematics, 131
Daniel Velleman (1984)
Simplified morassesJournal of Symbolic Logic, 49
R. Laver (1978)
Making the supercompactness of κ indestructible under κ-directed closed forcingIsrael Journal of Mathematics, 29
C. Casacuberta, Dirk Scevenels, Jeffrey Smith (2005)
Implications of large-cardinal principles in homotopical localizationAdvances in Mathematics, 197
Daniel Velleman (1982)
Morasses, diamond, and forcingAnn. Math. Log., 23
A. Kanamori (1994)
The Higher Infinite
M. Meyling (2019)
Axiomatic set theoryThe Student Mathematical Library
P. Vopenka, A. Pultr, Z. Hedrlín (1965)
A rigid relation exists on any set, 006
S. Friedman (2000)
Fine Structure and Class Forcing
J. Hamkins (1998)
The Lottery PreparationAnn. Pure Appl. Log., 101
T. Jech (2003)
Set Theory. The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded
A. Brooke-Taylor (2007)
Large cardinals and definable well-orders on the universeThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 74
M. Sorrentino, D. Matricano (2012)
Seconda Università di Napoli
S. Friedman (2005)
Large cardinals and $L$-like universes
(2003)
Set theory. The third millennium
Arthur Apter, J. Hamkins (1998)
Universal Indestructibility
A. Mathias (1983)
Surveys in set theory
(1972)
Almost huge cardinals and Vopenka’s principle, Notices of the American
J. Cummings (2010)
The Handbook of Set Theory, vol. 2
ScienceDirect (1969)
Annals of mathematical logicJournal of Symbolic Logic, 34
Azriel Levy, R. Solovay (1967)
Measurable cardinals and the continuum hypothesisIsrael Journal of Mathematics, 5
J. Hamkins, Thomas Johnstone (2010)
Indestructible Strong UnfoldabilityNotre Dame J. Formal Log., 51
D. Asperó, S. Friedman (2009)
Large cardinals and locally defined well-orders of the universeAnn. Pure Appl. Log., 157
K. Kunen (1980)
Set theory
Polska Nauk. (1979)
Bulletin de l'Académie polonaise des sciences. Série des sciences mathématiques
Thomas Johnstone (2008)
Strongly unfoldable cardinals made indestructibleJournal of Symbolic Logic, 73
J. Bagaria (2012)
C(n)-cardinalsArchive for Mathematical Logic, 51
A. Brooke-Taylor, S. Friedman (2008)
Large cardinals and gap-1 morassesAnn. Pure Appl. Log., 159
R. Solovay, W. Reinhardt, A. Kanamori (1978)
Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddingsAnnals of Mathematical Logic, 13
Kentaro Sato (2007)
Double helix in large large cardinals and iteration of elementary embeddingsAnn. Pure Appl. Log., 146
A. Pultr, V. Trnková (1980)
Combinatorial, algebraic, and topological representations of groups, semigroups, and categories
Joan Bagaria, C (n) cardinals, in preparation
Vopěnka’s Principle is a natural large cardinal axiom that has recently found applications in category theory and algebraic topology. We show that Vopěnka’s Principle and Vopěnka cardinals are relatively consistent with a broad range of other principles known to be independent of standard (ZFC) set theory, such as the Generalised Continuum Hypothesis, and the existence of a definable well-order on the universe of all sets. We achieve this by showing that they are indestructible under a broad class of forcing constructions, specifically, reverse Easton iterations of increasingly directed closed partial orders.
Archive for Mathematical Logic – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 28, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.