Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P Bacchetta, E van Wincoop (2006)
Can information heterogeneity explain the exchange rate determination puzzle?American Economic Review, 96
T Clark, KD West (2007)
Approximately normal tests for equal predictive accuracy in nested modelsJournal of Econometrics, 138
M Fratzscher, D Rime, L Sarno, G Zinna (2015)
The scapegoat theory of exchange rates: the first testsJournal of Monetary Economics, 70
P Della Corte, I Tsiakas, J James, IW Marsh, L Sarno (2012)
Statistical and economic methods for evaluating exchange rate predictabilityHandbook of exchange rates
P Bacchetta, E van Wincoop (2004)
A scapegoat model of exchange rate determinationAmerican Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 94
L Peng, W Xiong (2006)
Investor attention, overconfidence and category learningJournal of Financial Economics, 80
J Wright (2008)
Bayesian model averaging and exchange rate forecastingJournal of Econometrics, 146
S Campbell, S Sharpe (2009)
Anchoring bias in consensus forecasts and its effects on market pricesJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44
P Bacchetta (2004)
114American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 94
BM Barber, T Odean (2008)
All that glitters: the effect of attention and news on the buying behavior of individual and institutional investorsReview of Financial Studies, 21
O Coibion, Y Gorodnichenko (2012)
What can survey forecasts tell us about information rigidities?Journal of Political Economy, 120
D Andrei, M Hassler (2014)
Investor attention and stock market volatilityReview of Financial Studies, 28
D Laster, P Bennett, IS Geoum (1999)
Rational bias in macroeconomic forecastsQuarterly Journal of Economics, 114
J Mondria, T Wu, Y Zhang (2010)
The determinants of international investment and attention allocation: using internet search query dataJournal of International Economics, 82
N Sicherman, G Loewenstein, DJ Seppi, SP Utkus (2016)
Financial attentionReview of Financial Studies, 29
GJ Schinasi, PAVB Swamy (1989)
The out-of-sample forecasting performance of exchange rate models when coefficients are allowed to changeJournal of International Money and Finance, 8
S Goel, JM Hofman, S Lahaie, DM Pennock, DJ Watts (2010)
Predicting consumer behavior with web searchProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 7
Y Yuan (2015)
Market-wide attention, trading and stock returnsJournal of Financial Economics, 116
T Molodsova, DH Papell (2010)
Out-of-sample exchange rate predictability with Taylor rule fundamentalsJournal of International Economics, 77
DJ Simons, C Chabris (1999)
Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic eventsPerception, 28
Y Chen, K Rogoff, B Rossi (2010)
Can exchange rates forecast commodity prices?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125
C Burnside, M Eichebaum, I Kleshchelski, S Rebelo (2011)
Do peso problems explain the returns to the carry trade?Review of Financial Studies, 24
A Ben-Rephael, Z Da, RD Israelsen (2017)
It depends on where you search: institutional investor attention and underreaction to newsThe Review of Financial Studies, 30
RA Meese, K Rogoff (1983)
Empirical exchange rate models of the seventies: do they fit out of sample?Journal of International Economics, 14
P Bacchetta (2013)
18Journal of International Economics, 91
MH Pesaran, A Timmermann (1992)
A simple nonparametric test of predictive performanceJournal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10
Z Da, J Engelberg, P Gao (2011)
In search of attentionJournal of Finance, 66
L Sarno, G Valente (2009)
Exchange rates and fundamentals: footloose or evolving relationship?Journal of European Economic Association, 7
CA Sims (2003)
Implications of rational inattentionJournal of Monetary Economics, 50
P Bacchetta, E van Wincoop (2013)
On the unstable relationship between exchange rates and macroeconomic fundamentalsJournal of International Economics, 91
Y Cheung, MD Chinn, AG Pascual (2005)
Empirical exchange rate models of the nineties: are any fit to survive?Journal of International Money and Finance, 24
P Bacchetta (2006)
552American Economic Review, 96
B Rossi (2013)
Exchange rate predictabibilityJournal of Economic Literature, 51
D Hirshleifer, SH Teoh (2003)
Limited Attention, Information Disclosure, and Financial ReportingJournal of Accounting and Economics, 36
RA Rensink, JK O’Regan, JJ Clark (1997)
To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenesPsychological Science, 8
P Della Corte, L Sarno, I Tsiakas (2009)
An economic evaluation of empirical exchange rate modelsReview of Financial Studies, 22
D Andrei (2014)
33Review of Financial Studies, 28
C Engel, KD West (2005)
Exchange rate and fundamentalsJournal of Political Economy, 113
Y Cheung, MD Chinn (2001)
Currency traders and exchange rate dynamics: a survey of the US marketJournal of International Money and Finance, 20
O Coibion, Y Gorodnichenko (2015)
Information rigidity and the expectations formation process: a simple framework and new factsAmerican Economic Review, 105
R Kouwenberg, A Markiewicz, RC Verhoeks, RCJ Zwinkels (2017)
Model uncertainty and exchange rate forecastingJournal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52
J Stroop (1935)
Studies of interference in serial verbal reactionsJournal of Experimental Psychology, 28
M Hattori, HS Shin (2009)
Yen carry trade and the subprime crisisIMF Staff Papers, 56
H Choi, H Varian (2009)
Predicting the present with Google TrendsEconomic Record, 88
We test the rational inattention theory of exchange rates and proxy attention for different economic fundamentals by the search volume of related search queries on Google. We demonstrate that the higher the attention to a certain fundamental, the better its ability to forecast exchange rate movements. Our forecasts based on fundamental model selection by Google Trends significantly outperform the random walk, both statistically and economically. The best forecasts and the highest investment returns are systematically delivered by models that select the most salient fundamental. Both the survey expectations and the predicted currency returns are more persistent than their actual counterparts, consistent with the underreaction to economic news hypothesis. Investment returns are substantially higher during periods of elevated uncertainty, as a result of increased attention. Our findings provide strong support in favor of the rational inattention theory of exchange rates and the similar behaviour of the attention-based forecasts, and survey expectations suggest that the rational inattention operates via the expectation-formation channel.
IMF Economic Review – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2023
Keywords: F31; F41; E44
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.