Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Susan Curry, Robin Mermelstein, Amy Sporer, Christopher Federico, Jaime Napier, Steven Heine, Emma Buchtel, Todd Weber (2009)
Therapy for Specific Problems Therapy for Specific Problems : Youth Tobacco Cessation
M. Eckert (2004)
Neuroanatomical Markers for Dyslexia: A Review of Dyslexia Structural Imaging StudiesThe Neuroscientist, 10
B. Fischl, A. Kouwe, C. Destrieux, E. Halgren, F. Ségonne, D. Salat, Evelina Busa, L. Seidman, Jill Goldstein, D. Kennedy, V. Caviness, N. Makris, B. Rosen, A. Dale (2004)
Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex.Cerebral cortex, 14 1
E. Klapwijk, F. Kamp, M. Meulen, Sabine Peters, L. Wierenga (2019)
Qoala-T: A supervised-learning tool for quality control of FreeSurfer segmented MRI dataNeuroImage, 189
B. Fischl (2012)
FreeSurferNeuroImage, 62
D. Stekhoven, P. Bühlmann (2011)
MissForest - non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-type dataBioinformatics, 28 1
T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, J. Friedman (2001)
The Elements of Statistical Learning
F. Ségonne, A. Dale, Evelina Busa, M. Glessner, D. Salat, H. Hahn, B. Fischl (2004)
A hybrid approach to the skull stripping problem in MRINeuroImage, 22
I. Dinov (2018)
Data Science and Predictive Analytics
(2010)
Author manuscript, published in "Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2010;31(1):192-203" DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22003 Adaptive Non-Local Means Denoising of MR Images with Spatially Varying Noise Levels
B. Fischl, M. Sereno, A. Dale (1999)
Cortical Surface-Based Analysis II: Inflation, Flattening, and a Surface-Based Coordinate SystemNeuroImage, 9
S. Buuren, K. Groothuis-Oudshoorn (2011)
MICE: Multivariate Imputation by Chained Equations in RJournal of Statistical Software, 45
M. Reuter, N. Schmansky, H. Rosas, B. Fischl, B. Fischl (2012)
Within-subject template estimation for unbiased longitudinal image analysisNeuroImage, 61
Melissa Azur, E. Stuart, C. Frangakis, P. Leaf (2011)
Multiple imputation by chained equations: what is it and how does it work?International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 20
Neuroinformatics Original Research Article
A. Shah, J. Bartlett, J. Carpenter, O. Nicholas, H. Hemingway (2014)
Practice of Epidemiology Comparison of Random Forest and Parametric Imputation Models for Imputing Missing Data Using MICE: A CALIBER Study
C. Makowski, Sophie Béland, P. Kostopoulos, N. Bhagwat, Gabriel Devenyi, A. Malla, R. Joober, M. Lepage, M. Chakravarty (2017)
Evaluating accuracy of striatal, pallidal, and thalamic segmentation methods: Comparing automated approaches to manual delineationNeuroImage, 170
(2009)
Missing data analysis: making it work in the real world.
B. Fischl, D. Salat, A. Kouwe, N. Makris, F. Ségonne, B. Quinn, A. Dale (2004)
Sequence-independent segmentation of magnetic resonance imagesNeuroImage, 23
David Perez, Nassim Matin, B. Williams, K. Tanev, N. Makris, W. LaFrance, Bradford Dickerson (2018)
Cortical thickness alterations linked to somatoform and psychological dissociation in functional neurological disordersHuman Brain Mapping, 39
P. Coupé, P. Yger, S. Prima, P. Hellier, C. Kervrann, C. Barillot (2008)
An Optimized Blockwise Nonlocal Means Denoising Filter for 3-D Magnetic Resonance ImagesIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 27
Nicolas Wiest-Daesslé, S. Prima, P. Coupé, S. Morrissey, C. Barillot (2008)
Rician Noise Removal by Non-Local Means Filtering for Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio MRI: Applications to DT-MRIMedical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention, 11 Pt 2
J. Schafer (1999)
Multiple imputation: a primerStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 8
Federica Torri, I. Dinov, Alen Zamanyan, Sam Hobel, Alex Genco, P. Petrosyan, Andrew Clark, Zhizhong Liu, Paul Eggert, Jonathan Pierce, J. Knowles, J. Ames, C. Kesselman, A. Toga, S. Potkin, M. Vawter, F. Macciardi (2012)
Next Generation Sequence Analysis and Computational Genomics Using Graphical Pipeline WorkflowsGenes, 3
A. Hudak, N. Crookston, J. Evans, D. Hall, M. Falkowski (2008)
Nearest neighbor imputation of species-level, plot-scale forest structure attributes from LiDAR dataRemote Sensing of Environment, 112
ID Dinov (2018)
Data science and predictive analytics: Biomedical and health applications using R
S. Eskildsen, P. Coupé, V. Fonov, L. Østergaard, D. Collins (2011)
Effect of non-local means denoising on cortical segmentation accuracy with FACE
E. Gedamu, D. Collins, D. Arnold (2008)
Automated quality control of brain MR imagesJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 28
R. Desikan, F. Ségonne, B. Fischl, B. Quinn, B. Dickerson, D. Blacker, R. Buckner, A. Dale, R. Maguire, B. Hyman, M. Albert, R. Killiany (2006)
An automated labeling system for subdividing the human cerebral cortex on MRI scans into gyral based regions of interestNeuroImage, 31
A. Toga, Ian Foster, C. Kesselman, R. Madduri, K. Chard, E. Deutsch, N. Price, Gwênlyn Glusman, Benjamin Heavner, I. Dinov, J. Ames, J. Horn, R. Kramer, L. Hood (2015)
Big biomedical data as the key resource for discovery scienceJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 22 6
(2016)
Impute: Imputation for microarray data. R package version 1.48
I. Markovsky (2018)
Low Rank Approximation - Algorithms, Implementation, Applications
A. Waljee, Ashin Mukherjee, A. Singal, Yiwei Zhang, Jeffrey Warren, U. Balis, J. Marrero, Ji Zhu, P. Higgins (2013)
Comparison of imputation methods for missing laboratory data in medicineBMJ Open, 3
B. Fischl, D. Salat, Evelina Busa, M. Albert, M. Dieterich, C. Haselgrove, A. Kouwe, R. Killiany, D. Kennedy, Shuna Klaveness, A. Montillo, N. Makris, B. Rosen, A. Dale (2002)
Whole Brain Segmentation Automated Labeling of Neuroanatomical Structures in the Human BrainNeuron, 33
AD Shah, JW Bartlett, J Carpenter, O Nicholas, H Hemingway (2014)
Comparison of random forest and parametric imputation models for imputing missing data using MICE: A CALIBER studyAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 179
M. Gómez-Carracedo, J. Andrade, P. López‐Mahía, S. Muniategui, D. Prada (2014)
A practical comparison of single and multiple imputation methods to handle complex missing data in air quality datasetsChemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 134
R. Morey, C. Petty, Yuan Xu, J. Hayes, H. Wagner, D. Lewis, K. LaBar, M. Styner, G. McCarthy (2009)
A comparison of automated segmentation and manual tracing for quantifying hippocampal and amygdala volumesNeuroImage, 45
T. Satterthwaite, M. Elliott, K. Ruparel, J. Loughead, K. Prabhakaran, M. Calkins, Ryan Hopson, Chad Jackson, Jack Keefe, M. Riley, F. Mentch, P. Sleiman, R. Verma, C. Davatzikos, H. Hakonarson, R. Gur, R. Gur (2014)
Neuroimaging of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental CohortNeuroImage, 86
B. Fischl, A. Dale (2000)
Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97 20
M. Reuter, B. Fischl (2011)
Avoiding asymmetry-induced bias in longitudinal image processingNeuroImage, 57
Serveur Académique Lausannois SERVAL serval.unil.ch
D. Rubin (1989)
Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys
B Mortamet, MA Bernstein, CRJ Jack, JL Gunter, C Ward, PJ Britson, R Meuli, J-P Thiran, G Krueger (2009)
Automatic quality assessment in structural brain magnetic resonance imagingMagnetic Resonance in Medicine, 62
Abigail Waters, R. Mace, Kayle Sawyer, D. Gansler (2018)
Identifying errors in Freesurfer automated skull stripping and the incremental utility of manual interventionBrain Imaging and Behavior, 13
T. Satterthwaite, J. Connolly, K. Ruparel, M. Calkins, Chad Jackson, M. Elliott, D. Roalf, K. Prabhakaran, Ryan Hopson, Meckenzie Behr, H. Qiu, F. Mentch, R. Chiavacci, P. Sleiman, R. Gur, H. Hakonarson, R. Gur (2016)
The Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort: A publicly available resource for the study of normal and abnormal brain development in youthNeuroImage, 124
F. Sepehrband, Kirsten Lynch, R. Cabeen, C. González-Zacarías, Lu Zhao, Mike D'Arcy, C. Kesselman, M. Herting, I. Dinov, A. Toga, K. Clark (2018)
Neuroanatomical morphometric characterization of sex differences in youth using statistical learningNeuroImage, 172
R. Mazumder, T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani (2010)
Spectral Regularization Algorithms for Learning Large Incomplete MatricesJournal of machine learning research : JMLR, 11
E. Gronenschild, P. Habets, H. Jacobs, R. Mengelers, N. Rozendaal, J. os, M. Marcelis (2012)
The Effects of FreeSurfer Version, Workstation Type, and Macintosh Operating System Version on Anatomical Volume and Cortical Thickness MeasurementsPLoS ONE, 7
N. Tustison, P. Cook, A. Klein, G. Song, Sandhitsu Das, J. Duda, Benjamin Kandel, N. Strien, J. Stone, J. Gee, B. Avants (2014)
Large-scale evaluation of ANTs and FreeSurfer cortical thickness measurementsNeuroImage, 99
S. Moon, I. Dinov, Jaebum Kim, Alen Zamanyan, Sam Hobel, P. Thompson, A. Toga (2015)
Structural Neuroimaging Genetics Interactions in Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 48 4
N. Vijayakumar, N. Allen, G. Youssef, Meg Dennison, M. Yücel, J. Simmons, S. Whittle (2016)
Brain development during adolescence: A mixed‐longitudinal investigation of cortical thickness, surface area, and volumeHuman Brain Mapping, 37
Xiaojing Long, Weiqi Liao, Chunxiang Jiang, Dong Liang, B. Qiu, Lijuan Zhang (2012)
Healthy aging: an automatic analysis of global and regional morphological alterations of human brain.Academic radiology, 19 7
H Mak (2011)
Next-generation sequence analysisNature Biotechnology, 29
I. Dinov, K. Lozev, P. Petrosyan, Zhizhong Liu, Paul Eggert, Jonathan Pierce, Alen Zamanyan, Shruthi Chakrapani, J. Horn, D. Parker, R. Magsipoc, Kelvin Leung, B. Gutman, R. Woods, A. Toga (2010)
Neuroimaging Study Designs, Computational Analyses and Data Provenance Using the LONI PipelinePLoS ONE, 5
G. Perlaki, R. Horváth, S. Nagy, P. Bogner, T. Dóczi, J. Janszky, G. Orsi (2017)
Comparison of accuracy between FSL’s FIRST and Freesurfer for caudate nucleus and putamen segmentationScientific Reports, 7
F. Ségonne, J. Pacheco, B. Fischl (2007)
Geometrically Accurate Topology-Correction of Cortical Surfaces Using Nonseparating LoopsIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 26
A. Dale, B. Fischl, M. Sereno (1999)
Cortical Surface-Based Analysis I. Segmentation and Surface ReconstructionNeuroImage, 9
E. Luders, K. Narr, Paul Thompson, D. Rex, R. Woods, Heather DeLuca, L. Jäncke, A. Toga (2006)
Gender effects on cortical thickness and the influence of scalingHuman Brain Mapping, 27
Matthew Lee, B. Bartholow, D. McCarthy, S. Pedersen, K. Sher (2015)
Two alternative approaches to conventional person-mean imputation scoring of the Self-Rating of the Effects of Alcohol Scale (SRE).Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 29 1
J. Sled, A. Zijdenbos, Alan Evans (1998)
A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI dataIEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 17
M. Reuter, H. Rosas, B. Fischl, B. Fischl (2010)
Highly accurate inverse consistent registration: A robust approachNeuroImage, 53
Lucas Eggert, J. Sommer, A. Jansen, T. Kircher, C. Konrad (2012)
Accuracy and Reliability of Automated Gray Matter Segmentation Pathways on Real and Simulated Structural Magnetic Resonance Images of the Human BrainPLoS ONE, 7
Regional morphological analysis represents a crucial step in most neuroimaging studies. Results from brain segmentation techniques are intrinsically prone to certain degrees of variability, mainly as results of suboptimal segmentation. To reduce this inherent variability, the errors are often identified through visual inspection and then corrected (semi)manually. Identification and correction of incorrect segmentation could be very expensive for large-scale studies. While identification of the incorrect results can be done relatively fast even with manual inspection, the correction step is extremely time-consuming, as it requires training staff to perform laborious manual corrections. Here we frame the correction phase of this problem as a missing data problem. Instead of manually adjusting the segmentation outputs, our computational approach aims to derive accurate morphological measures by machine learning imputation. Data imputation techniques may be used to replace missing or incorrect region average values with carefully chosen imputed values, all of which are computed based on other available multivariate information. We examined our approach of correcting segmentation outputs on a cohort of 970 subjects, which were undergone an extensive, time-consuming, manual post-segmentation correction. A random forest imputation technique recovered the gold standard results with a significant accuracy (r = 0.93, p < 0.0001; when 30% of the segmentations were considered incorrect in a non-random fashion). The random forest technique proved to be most effective for big data studies (N > 250).
Neuroinformatics – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 4, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.