Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Impurities block the α to ω martensitic transformation in titanium

Impurities block the α to ω martensitic transformation in titanium Impurities control phase stability and phase transformations in natural and man-made materials, from shape-memory alloys 1 to steel 2 to planetary cores 3 . Experiments and empirical databases are still central to tuning the impurity effects. What is missing is a broad theoretical underpinning. Consider, for example, the titanium martensitic transformations: diffusionless structural transformations proceeding near the speed of sound 2 . Pure titanium transforms from ductile α to brittle ω at 9 GPa, creating serious technological problems for β-stabilized titanium alloys. Impurities in the titanium alloys A-70 and Ti–6Al–4V (wt%) suppress the transformation up to at least 35 GPa, increasing their technological utility as lightweight materials in aerospace applications. These and other empirical discoveries in technological materials call for broad theoretical understanding. Impurities pose two theoretical challenges: the effect on the relative phase stability, and the energy barrier of the transformation. Ab initio methods 4,5 calculate both changes due to impurities. We show that interstitial oxygen, nitrogen and carbon retard the transformation whereas substitutional aluminium and vanadium influence the transformation by changing the d-electron concentration 6 . The resulting microscopic picture explains the suppression of the transformation in commercial A-70 and Ti–6Al–4V alloys. In general, the effect of impurities on relative energies and energy barriers is central to understanding structural phase transformations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Nature Materials Springer Journals

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/impurities-block-the-to-martensitic-transformation-in-titanium-mERyBTRJvF

References (27)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Nature Publishing Group
Subject
Materials Science; Materials Science, general; Optical and Electronic Materials; Biomaterials; Nanotechnology; Condensed Matter Physics
ISSN
1476-1122
eISSN
1476-4660
DOI
10.1038/nmat1292
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Impurities control phase stability and phase transformations in natural and man-made materials, from shape-memory alloys 1 to steel 2 to planetary cores 3 . Experiments and empirical databases are still central to tuning the impurity effects. What is missing is a broad theoretical underpinning. Consider, for example, the titanium martensitic transformations: diffusionless structural transformations proceeding near the speed of sound 2 . Pure titanium transforms from ductile α to brittle ω at 9 GPa, creating serious technological problems for β-stabilized titanium alloys. Impurities in the titanium alloys A-70 and Ti–6Al–4V (wt%) suppress the transformation up to at least 35 GPa, increasing their technological utility as lightweight materials in aerospace applications. These and other empirical discoveries in technological materials call for broad theoretical understanding. Impurities pose two theoretical challenges: the effect on the relative phase stability, and the energy barrier of the transformation. Ab initio methods 4,5 calculate both changes due to impurities. We show that interstitial oxygen, nitrogen and carbon retard the transformation whereas substitutional aluminium and vanadium influence the transformation by changing the d-electron concentration 6 . The resulting microscopic picture explains the suppression of the transformation in commercial A-70 and Ti–6Al–4V alloys. In general, the effect of impurities on relative energies and energy barriers is central to understanding structural phase transformations.

Journal

Nature MaterialsSpringer Journals

Published: Jan 23, 2005

There are no references for this article.