Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Flory, E. Emanuel (2004)
Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: a systematic review.JAMA, 292 13
Christine Daley, A. James, Randall Barnoskie, Marcia Segraves, Ryan Schupbach, Won Choi (2006)
"Tobacco has a purpose, not just a past": Feasibility of developing a culturally appropriate smoking cessation program for a pan-tribal native population.Medical anthropology quarterly, 20 4
Samantha Torres, E. Riva, Laura Tom, M. Clayman, Chirisse Taylor, XinQi Dong, M. Simon (2015)
The Development of a Communication Tool to Facilitate the Cancer Trial Recruitment Process and Increase Research Literacy among Underrepresented PopulationsJournal of Cancer Education, 30
R. Haring, W. Henry, M. Hudson, E. Rodriguez, M. Taualii (2016)
Views on clinical trial recruitment, biospecimen collection, and cancer research: population science from landscapes of the Haudenosaunee (People of the Longhouse)Journal of Cancer Education, 33
K. Wells, M. Arevalo, C. Meade, C. Gwede, G. Quinn, John Luque, G. Miguel, Dale Watson, R. Phillips, Carmen Reyes, M. Romo, J. West, P. Jacobsen (2014)
Development and Validation of the Biobanking Attitudes and Knowledge Survey (BANKS)Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 23
A. Smith (1984)
Clinical trialsMedical Journal of Australia, 140
S. Treweek, P. Lockhart, Marie Pitkethly, J. Cook, Monica Kjeldstrøm, M. Johansen, T. Taskila, F. Sullivan, Sue Wilson, Catherine Jackson, Ritu Jones, E. Mitchell (2013)
Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ Open, 3
L. Yee, Jamie McGuire, Shaneah Taylor, C. Niznik, M. Simon (2015)
“I Was Tired of All the Sticking and Poking”: Identifying Barriers to Diabetes Self-Care Among Low-Income Pregnant WomenJournal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 26
B. Gaglio, Siobhan Phillips, S. Heurtin‐Roberts, Michael Sanchez, R. Glasgow (2014)
How pragmatic is it? Lessons learned using PRECIS and RE-AIM for determining pragmatic characteristics of researchImplementation Science : IS, 9
M. Kreuter, Susan Lukwago, Dawn Bucholtz, E. Clark, Vetta Sanders-Thompson (2003)
Achieving Cultural Appropriateness in Health Promotion Programs: Targeted and Tailored ApproachesHealth Education & Behavior, 30
Winnie Loh, P. Butow, Richard Brown, F. Boyle (2002)
Ethical communication in clinical trialsCancer, 95
MS Chen, PN Lara, JH Dang, DA Paterniti, K Kelly (2014)
Twenty years post-NIH revitalization act: enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrual: renewing the case for enhancing minority participation in cancer clinical trialsCancer, 120
T. Frieden (2013)
CDC Health Disparities and Inequalities Report - United States, 2013. Foreword.MMWR supplements, 62 3
M. Fouad, Aras Acemgil, S. Bae, A. Forero, N. Lisovicz, Michelle Martin, G. Oates, E. Partridge, S. Vickers (2016)
Patient Navigation As a Model to Increase Participation of African Americans in Cancer Clinical Trials.Journal of oncology practice, 12 6
J. Dang, E. Rodriguez, John Luque, D. Erwin, C. Meade, Moon Chen (2014)
Engaging diverse populations about biospecimen donation for cancer researchJournal of Community Genetics, 5
Moon Chen, P. Lara, J. Dang, D. Paterniti, Karen Kelly (2014)
Twenty years post‐NIH Revitalization Act: Enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): Laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrualCancer, 120
P. Bower, Valerie Brueton, C. Gamble, S. Treweek, Catrin Smith, B. Young, P. Williamson (2014)
Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future prioritiesTrials, 15
P. Breese, W. Burman, S. Goldberg, S. Weis (2007)
Education Level, Primary Language, and Comprehension of the Informed Consent ProcessJournal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 2
S. Morgan, A. Occa, JoNell Potter, Ashton Mouton, M. Peter (2017)
“You Need to Be a Good Listener”: Recruiters’ Use of Relational Communication Behaviors to Enhance Clinical Trial and Research Study AccrualJournal of Health Communication, 22
B. Lorenzen, Constance Melby, Barb Earles (2008)
Using principles of health literacy to enhance the informed consent process.AORN journal, 88 1
S. Page, K. Manhas, D. Muruve (2016)
A survey of patient perspectives on the research use of health information and biospecimensBMC Medical Ethics, 17
A. McCray (2004)
Application of Information Technology: Promoting Health LiteracyJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 12 2
WY Loh, PN Butow, RF Brown, F Boyle (2002)
Ethical communication in clinical trials. Issues faced by data managers in obtaining informed consentCancer, 95
S. Morgan, Ashton Mouton, A. Occa, JoNell Potter (2016)
Clinical Trial and Research Study Recruiters’ Verbal Communication BehaviorsJournal of Health Communication, 21
S. Vickers, M. Fouad (2014)
An overview of EMPaCT and fundamental issues affecting minority participation in cancer clinical trials: Enhancing minority participation in clinical trials (EMPaCT): Laying the groundwork for improving minority clinical trial accrualCancer, 120
M. Simon, E. Riva, R. Bergan, Carrie Norbeck, J. McKoy, P. Kulesza, XinQi Dong, J. Schink, L. Fleisher (2014)
Improving Diversity in Cancer Research Trials: The Story of the Cancer Disparities Research NetworkJournal of Cancer Education, 29
D. Cortés, M. Drainoni, Lori Henault, M. Paasche-Orlow (2010)
How to Achieve Informed Consent for Research from Spanish-Speaking Individuals with Low Literacy: A Qualitative ReportJournal of Health Communication, 15
AT McCray (2005)
Promoting health literacyJ Am Med Inform Assoc, 12
Racial/ethnic minorities are underrepresented in clinical research in the USA for multifarious reasons, including barriers to effective communication between researchers and potential research participants. To address the communication barriers between researchers and potential participants, we developed a Research Literacy Support (RLS) tool. The focus of this report is to present findings from the second and third phases of development that refined and assessed usability of the RLS tool. We utilized a mixed-methods approach that entailed iterative cognitive testing with participants (N = 52) from diverse racial/ethnic backgrounds and interviews with clinical research recruiters (N = 20) to modify and refine the design and content of the RLS tool (phase 2). This was followed by assessment of the usability of the RLS tool by 100 participants (phase 3). During phase 2, participants provided feedback about layout, word choice, and comprehension of the tool. In phase 3, participants recognized that they had gained knowledge about clinical research from the RLS tool, although they still had a substantial learning gap after using the tool, indicating an opportunity for further refinement. The RLS tool may help advance health equity by addressing communication barriers that may impede minority participation in clinical research.
Journal of Cancer Education – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 24, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.