Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Impact of Information About Sentencing Decisions on Public Attitudes Toward the Criminal Justice System

Impact of Information About Sentencing Decisions on Public Attitudes Toward the Criminal Justice... Research reveals public dissatisfaction with perceived leniency of the criminal justice system. However, when asked to sentence hypothetical offenders, members of the public tend to choose dispositions similar to what current court practices prescribe. In two studies reported here, subjects completed a mock sentencing exercise and a general attitude survey. In an initial pilot study, they expressed general dissatisfaction with the criminal justice system but the relative punitiveness of their sentences (in terms of their perceptions of how severe various sentencing options are) was only slightly elevated above a set of reference sentences. Providing a typical judge's sentencing decisions did not decrease dissatisfaction but was associated with an anchoring effect. This effect was explored in the main study by manipulating the provided reference sentences to be either lenient, moderate, or punitive. Again, participants expressed general dissatisfaction with the criminal justice system but prescribed generally moderate sentences, anchoring their sentences to the information provided. However, only those exposed to moderate “typical” sentences subsequently reported reduced dissatisfaction with the criminal justice system. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Law and Human Behavior Springer Journals

Impact of Information About Sentencing Decisions on Public Attitudes Toward the Criminal Justice System

St Amand, Michelle; Zamble, Edward
Law and Human Behavior , Volume 25 (5) – Oct 7, 2004
Download PDF
14 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/impact-of-information-about-sentencing-decisions-on-public-attitudes-umLzy0dRHm

References (28)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by American Psychology-Law Society/Division 41 of the American Psychology Association
Subject
Psychology; Law and Psychology; Criminology and Criminal Justice, general; Personality and Social Psychology; Community and Environmental Psychology
ISSN
0147-7307
eISSN
1573-661X
DOI
10.1023/A:1012844932754
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Research reveals public dissatisfaction with perceived leniency of the criminal justice system. However, when asked to sentence hypothetical offenders, members of the public tend to choose dispositions similar to what current court practices prescribe. In two studies reported here, subjects completed a mock sentencing exercise and a general attitude survey. In an initial pilot study, they expressed general dissatisfaction with the criminal justice system but the relative punitiveness of their sentences (in terms of their perceptions of how severe various sentencing options are) was only slightly elevated above a set of reference sentences. Providing a typical judge's sentencing decisions did not decrease dissatisfaction but was associated with an anchoring effect. This effect was explored in the main study by manipulating the provided reference sentences to be either lenient, moderate, or punitive. Again, participants expressed general dissatisfaction with the criminal justice system but prescribed generally moderate sentences, anchoring their sentences to the information provided. However, only those exposed to moderate “typical” sentences subsequently reported reduced dissatisfaction with the criminal justice system.

Journal

Law and Human Behavior – Springer Journals

Published: Oct 7, 2004

There are no references for this article.