Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Hightower, K. Magowan, Lori Brown, D. Fox (2013)
Reliability of Fish Size Estimates Obtained From Multibeam Imaging SonarJournal of Fish and Wildlife Management, 4
J. Clarke, L. Mayer, D. Wells (1996)
Shallow-water imaging multibeam sonars: A new tool for investigating seafloor processes in the coastal zone and on the continental shelfMarine Geophysical Researches, 18
G. Hastie (2013)
TRACKING MARINE MAMMALS AROUND MARINE RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVICES USING ACTIVE SONAR
I. Parnum (2007)
Benthic habitat mapping using multibeam sonar systems
P. Brehmer (2006)
Fisheries Acoustics: Theory and Practice, 2nd ednFish and Fisheries, 7
JE Simmonds, DM MacLennan (2005)
Fisheries Acoustics, Theory and Practice
Miles Parsons, I. Parnum, Kim Allen, R. McCauley, C. Erbe (2014)
Detection of sharks with the Gemini imaging sonarAcoustics Australia, 42
A. Becker, P. Cowley, A. Whitfield, J. Järnegren, T. Næsje (2011)
Diel fish movements in the littoral zone of a temporarily closed South African estuaryJournal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 406
Myounghee Kang (2011)
Semiautomated Analysis of Data from an Imaging Sonar for Fish Counting, Sizing, and Tracking in a Post-Processing ApplicationFisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 14
Craig Rose, A. Stoner, Keith Matteson (2005)
Use of high-frequency imaging sonar to observe fish behaviour near baited fishing gearsFisheries Research, 76
Lilian Lieber, B. Williamson, Catherine Jones, L. Noble, A. Brierley, P. Miller, B. Scott (2014)
Introducing novel uses of multibeam sonar to study basking sharks in the light of marine renewable energy extraction
F. Gerlotto, M. Soria, P. Fréon (1999)
From two dimensions to three: the use of multibeam sonar for a new approach in fisheries acousticsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56
R. Urick (1975)
Principles of underwater sound
Georg Rakowitz, M. Tušer, M. Říha, T. Jůza, H. Balk, J. Kubečka (2012)
Use of high-frequency imaging sonar (DIDSON) to observe fish behaviour towards a surface trawlFisheries Research
A. Popper, M. Hastings (2009)
The effects of anthropogenic sources of sound on fishes.Journal of fish biology, 75 3
A. Becker, A. Whitfield, P. Cowley, J. Järnegren, T. Næsje (2013)
Potential effects of artificial light associated with anthropogenic infrastructure on the abundance and foraging behaviour of estuary‐associated fishesJournal of Applied Ecology, 50
F. Gerlotto, Carlos Hernandez, E. Linares (1998)
Experiences with multibeam sonar in shallow tropical watersFisheries Research, 35
X. Lurton, J. Augustin, S. Dugelay, L. Hellequin, M. Voisset (1997)
Shallow-water seafloor characterization for high-frequency multibeam echosounder: image segmentation using angular backscatter
K. Boswell, Matthew Wilson, J. Cowan (2008)
A Semiautomated Approach to Estimating Fish Size, Abundance, and Behavior from Dual-Frequency Identification Sonar (DIDSON) DataNorth American Journal of Fisheries Management, 28
W. Richardson (1995)
Marine Mammals and Noise
(2013)
Visualising a Samsonfish (Seriola hippos) spawning aggregation in Western Australia Using a Reson 7125 multi-beam sonar
A. Becker, A. Whitfield, P. Cowley, J. Järnegren, T. Naesje (2011)
An assessment of the size structure, distribution and behaviour of fish populations within a temporarily closed estuary using dual frequency identification sonar (DIDSON).Journal of fish biology, 79 3
M. Langkau, H. Balk, M. Schmidt, J. Borcherding (2012)
Can acoustic shadows identify fish species? A novel application of imaging sonar dataFisheries Management and Ecology, 19
Multibeam sonar systems are increasingly used to detect, quantify and monitor behaviour of marine fauna. Over ranges of tens to hundreds of metres, animals can be detected as targets. However, at shorter ranges (typically $${<}10 \, \hbox {m}$$ < 10 m ) and in good conditions, high-frequency ( $${>}1 \, \hbox {kHz}$$ > 1 kHz ) sonar systems can provide high-quality images earning the term ‘acoustic cameras’ and have become particularly advantageous for discriminating and counting fish. However, limitations of power and the significant increase in attenuation with frequency limit the achievable range of such acoustic cameras. Systems that operate at frequencies between those of mapping and fisheries sonar (typically $${<}400\, \hbox {kHz}$$ < 400 kHz ) and acoustic cameras ( $${\approx }1 \, \hbox {MHz}$$ ≈ 1 MHz ) are often used for short-range navigation and to evaluate underwater structures. While these systems produce images at reduced resolution compared to acoustic cameras, they may also be capable of distinguishing features of marine fauna and do so at greater ranges. This study utilised a Tritech Gemini 720i imaging sonar to produce images from 14 species of fauna at close range. It assessed some simple morphological parameters, such as length and breadth, and highlighted the possibilities of using these to categorise targets. It also provided a coarse description of issues associated with using such a system for monitoring marine animals.
Acoustics Australia – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 31, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.