Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/identity-for-deviations-from-the-exact-solution-of-the-problem-LBrgCXVHaL
References (42)
-
P. Ciarlet (2002)
The finite element method for elliptic problems, 40
-
(2005)
Superconvergence property,” SIAM J -
D. Braess (1997)
10.1007/978-3-662-07233-2Finite Elements
-
S. Repin (2016)
Poincaré Type Inequalities for Vector Functions with Zero Mean Normal Traces on the Boundary and Applications to Interpolation MethodsComputational Methods in Applied Sciences
-
R. Ewing, R. Lazarov, J. Wang (1991)
Superconvergence of the velocity along the Gauss lines in mixed finite element methodsSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 28
-
O. Zienkiewicz, J. Zhu (1987)
A simple error estimator and adaptive procedure for practical engineerng analysisInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 24
-
S. Repin (2008)
A Posteriori Estimates for Partial Differential Equations -
S. Miranda, F. Ubertini (2004)
A posteriori error estimation in finite element analysis -
P. Arbenz (1982)
Computable Finite Element Error Bounds for Poisson's EquationIma Journal of Numerical Analysis, 2
-
A. Ern, M. Vohralík (2013)
Four closely related equilibrated flux reconstructions for nonconforming finite elementsComptes Rendus Mathematique, 351
-
S. Repin (2003)
Two-sided estimates of deviation from exact solutions of uniformly elliptic equations -
M. Ainsworth, J. T. Oden (2000)
10.1002/9781118032824A posteriori Error Estimation in Finite Element Analysis
-
Rüdiger Verführt (1996)
A review of a posteriori error estimation and adaptive mesh-refinement techniques -
D. Braess, J. Schöberl (2007)
Equilibrated residual error estimator for edge elementsMath. Comput., 77
-
(1997)
Finite Elements (Cambridge -
O. Ladyzhenskai︠a︡ (1967)
Boundary value problems of mathematical physics -
R. Barnhill, J. Brown, A. Mitchell (1981)
A Comparison of Finite Element Error Bounds for Poisson's EquationIma Journal of Numerical Analysis, 1
-
J. Roberts, J. Thomas (1991)
Mixed and hybrid methodsHandbook of Numerical Analysis, 2
-
S. Repin (2000)
A posteriori error estimation for variational problems with uniformly convex functionalsMath. Comput., 69
-
S. Repin (2000)
A posteriori error estimation for nonlinear variational problems by duality theoryJournal of Mathematical Sciences, 99
-
M. Křížek, P. Neittaanmäki (1984)
Superconvergence phenomenon in the finite element method arising from averaging gradientsNumerische Mathematik, 45
-
Xuefeng Liu, F. Kikuchi (2010)
Analysis and Estimation of Error Constants for P0 and P1 Interpolations over Triangular Finite ElementsJournal of Mathematical Sciences, 17
-
S. Repin, S. Sauter (2020)
Accuracy of Mathematical Models -
O. Mali, P. Neittaanmäki, S. Repin (2014)
Accuracy Verification Methods -
S. Repin (2012)
Computable majorants of constants in the Poincaré and Friedrichs inequalitiesJournal of Mathematical Sciences, 186
-
O. Mali, P. Neittaanmki, S. Repin (2013)
Accuracy Verification Methods: Theory and Algorithms -
(2002)
Low order conforming, non-conforming, and mixed FEM,” Math -
A. Ern, S. Nicaise, M. Vohralík (2007)
An accurate H(div) flux reconstruction for discontinuous Galerkin approximations of elliptic problemsComptes Rendus Mathematique, 345
-
C. Carstensen, S. Funken (1999)
Fully Reliable Localized Error Control in the FEMSIAM J. Sci. Comput., 21
-
P. Clément (1975)
Approximation by finite element functions using local regularization, 9
-
K. Eriksson, D. Estep, P. Hansbo, Claes Johnson (1995)
Introduction to Adaptive Methods for Differential EquationsActa Numerica, 4
-
Zhimin Zhang, Ahmed Naga (2005)
A New Finite Element Gradient Recovery Method: Superconvergence PropertySIAM J. Sci. Comput., 26
-
C. Carstensen, S. Bartels (2002)
Each averaging technique yields reliable a posteriori error control in FEM on unstructured grids. Part I: Low order conforming, nonconforming, and mixed FEMMath. Comput., 71
-
P. Ladevèze, D. Leguillon (1983)
Error Estimate Procedure in the Finite Element Method and ApplicationsSIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 20
-
(1988)
Superconvergence of the gradient for triangular and tetrahedral finite elements of a solution of linear problems in elasticity theory, -
M. Zlámal (1977)
Some superconvergence results in the finite element method -
F. Fortin (1991)
Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods (Springer Series in Computational Mathematics) -
F. Natterer (1975)
Berechenbare Fehlerschranken für die Methode der Finiten Elemente -
L. B. Wahlbin (1995)
10.1007/BFb0096835Superconvergence in Galerkin Finite Element Methods
-
F. Brezzi, M. Fortin (2011)
Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods, 15
-
D. Kelly (1984)
The self‐equilibration of residuals and complementary a posteriori error estimates in the finite element methodInternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 20
-
S. Chow, G. Carey, R. Lazarov (1991)
Natural and postprocessed superconvergence in semilinear problemsNumerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 7
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2021. ISSN 0965-5425, Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, 2021, Vol. 61, No. 12, pp. 1943–1965. © Pleiades Publishing, Ltd., 2021. Russian Text © The Author(s), 2021, published in Zhurnal Vychislitel’noi Matematiki i Matematicheskoi Fiziki, 2021, Vol. 61, No. 12, pp. 1986–2009.
- ISSN
- 0965-5425
- eISSN
- 1555-6662
- DOI
- 10.1134/s0965542521120113
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
For elliptic equations of the form \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$$\Lambda {\text{*}}\mathcal{A}\Lambda u + \ell = 0$$\end{document}, we examine how to compute the distance between the function u and its arbitrary approximation \documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$${v}$$\end{document} from the corresponding energy space. The analysis is based on an identity that holds for the norms of the deviations from the exact solution of this problem and the exact solution of the dual problem. This identity has a number of implications. Specifically, with the help of it, the maximum and minimum distances to the exact solution can be estimated using only the given approximate solution, the data of the problem, and the solution of a specially constructed finite-dimensional problem. Moreover, there is no need to use Clément’s interpolation or flux equilibration. It is shown that the estimates are equivalent to corresponding norms of the distance to the solution and are applicable to a large class of approximations, including Galerkin ones and rather rough approximations of the exact solution. These results are checked using a series of numerical experiments that compare the efficiency of various methods.
Journal
Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2021
Keywords: elliptic equations; estimates of the deviation from the exact solution; a posteriori accuracy estimates for approximate solutions