Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J Law (2004)
10.4324/9780203481141
C. Madge, J. Meek, J. Wellens, T. Hooley (2009)
Facebook, social integration and informal learning at university: ‘It is more for socialising and talking to friends about work than for actually doing work’Learning, Media and Technology, 34
C. Gunawardena, Frank Zittle (1997)
Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer‐mediated conferencing environmentAmerican Journal of Distance Education, 11
(2015)
Sosial tilstedeværelse i digitale læringsomgivelser
K. Kreijns, F. Acker, Marjan Vermeulen, Hans Buuren (2014)
Community of Inquiry: Social Presence RevisitedE-Learning and Digital Media, 11
Monica Johannesen, O. Erstad, Laurence Habib (2012)
Virtual learning environments as sociomaterial agents in the network of teaching practiceComput. Educ., 59
J. Law (2004)
After Method: Mess in Social Science Research
Jiseong Son, Jeong-Dong Kim, Hong-Seok Na, D. Baik (2016)
A Social Learning Management System Supporting Feedback for Incorrect Answers based on Social Network ServicesJ. Educ. Technol. Soc., 19
A. Hollyhead, D. Edwards, G. Holt (2012)
The Use of Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) and Social Network Site (SNS) Hosted Forums in Higher EducationIndustry and Higher Education, 26
O Dysthe (2013)
Dialogue-based. The art museum as a learning space
P. Hetland, A. Mørch (2016)
ETHNOGRAPHY FOR INVESTIGATING THE INTERNETSeminar.net
N. Selwyn (2009)
Faceworking: exploring students' education‐related use of FacebookLearning, Media and Technology, 34
W. Orlikowski (2007)
Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at WorkOrganization Studies, 28
D. Silverman (2004)
Qualitative research : theory, method and practice
Nils Birkeland, Elisabeth Drange, Elise Tønnessen (2015)
Digital collaboration inside and outside educational systemsE-Learning and Digital Media, 12
D Durkee, S Brant, P Nevin, A Odell, G Williams, D Melomey, A Lopes (2009)
Implementing E-Learning and Web 2.0 innovation: Didactical scenarios and practical implicationsIndustry and Higher Education, 23
T Anderson (2011)
10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12
K. Eisenhardt (1989)
Building theories from case study researchSTUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
C. Hine (2015)
Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, Embodied and Everyday
David Mykota (2015)
A Replication Study on the Multi-Dimensionality of Online Social Presence.Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14
KM Eisenhardt (2002)
The qualitative resaercher’s companion
(2013)
Theoretical perspective on dialogue and dialogue-based teaching
Gila Kurtz (2014)
Integrating a Facebook Group and a Course Website: The Effect on Participation and Perceptions on LearningAmerican Journal of Distance Education, 28
K. Mathieson, J. Leafman (2014)
Comparison of Student and Instructor Perceptions of Social Presence.Journal of Educators Online, 11
Daniel Müller, S. Strohmeier (2011)
Design characteristics of virtual learning environments: state of researchComput. Educ., 57
Eli Miron, G. Ravid (2015)
Facebook Groups as an Academic Teaching Aid: Case Study and Recommendations for EducatorsJ. Educ. Technol. Soc., 18
M. Patton (2002)
Qualitative research & evaluation methods
Monica Johannesen, L. Mifsud, Leikny Øgrim (2016)
FACEBOOK, CANVAS AND SOCIAL PRESENCE IN ONLINE DISCUSSIONS
RK Yin (2003)
Applications of case study research
N. Lambropoulos, X. Faulkner, F. Culwin (2012)
Supporting social awareness in collaborative e-learningBr. J. Educ. Technol., 43
Hagit Meishar-Tal, Gila Kurtz, E. Pieterse (2012)
Facebook groups as LMS: A case studyThe International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13
Laura Flitton, P. Warwick (2013)
From classroom analysis to whole-school professional development: promoting talk as a tool for learning across school departmentsProfessional Development in Education, 39
M. Maleko, Dip Nandi, M. Hamilton, Daryl D'Souza, James Harland (2013)
Facebook versus Blackboard for Supporting the Learning of Programming in a Fully Online Course: The Changing Face of Computing Education2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering
T. Fenwick, R. Edwards, Peter Sawchuk (2011)
Emerging Approaches to Educational Research: Tracing the Socio-Material
S. Manca, M. Ranieri (2013)
Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environmentJ. Comput. Assist. Learn., 29
Estrid Sørensen (2001)
The Materiality of Learning
K. Ebbesen (2006)
Elevens verden: innføring i pedagogisk psykologi
M Johannesen, L Øgrim (2015)
Samtalens didaktiske muligheter
D. Garrison, T. Anderson, W. Archer (1999)
Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher EducationInternet High. Educ., 2
Monica Johannesen, Leikny Øgrim, Ole Smørdal (2016)
FACEBOOK AS AN ACTOR - A CASE OF STUDENTS NEGOTIATING THEIR SOCIAL PRESENCE IN AN ONLINE COURSESeminar.net
C. Tu, M. Mcisaac (2002)
The Relationship of Social Presence and Interaction in Online ClassesAmerican Journal of Distance Education, 16
Huseyin Uzunboylu, Huseyin Bicen, Nadire Cavus (2011)
The efficient virtual learning environment: A case study of web 2.0 tools and Windows live spacesComput. Educ., 56
N. Petrović, V. Jeremic, M. Ćirović, Z. Radojicic, Nemanja Milenković (2013)
FACEBOOK VS. MOODLE: WHAT DO STUDENTS REALLY THINK?
(2011)
Higher education and the promises and perils of social network
E. Matusov, K. Miyazaki (2014)
Dialogue on Dialogic Pedagogy, 2
T. Anderson, Jon Dron (2020)
Three Generations of Distance Education Pedagogy
E Sørensen (2009)
The materiality of learning. Technology and knowledge in educational practice
G. Salmon, B. Ross, E. Pechenkina, A. Chase (2015)
The space for social media in structured online learningResearch in Learning Technology, 23
T. Fenwick, R. Edwards (2010)
Actor-Network Theory in Education
Glenn Bowen (2009)
Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research MethodQualitative Research Journal, 9
C. Crook, Robert Cluley (2009)
The teaching voice on the learning platform: seeking classroom climates within a virtual learning environmentLearning, Media and Technology, 34
David Durkee, S. Brant, Pete Nevin, Annette Odell, Godfried Williams, Divina Melomey, Hedley Roberts, C. Imafidon, Roy Perryman, Anna Lopes (2009)
Implementing E-Learning and Web 2.0 InnovationIndustry and Higher Education, 23
W. Bennett, Alexandra Segerberg (2011)
DIGITAL MEDIA AND THE PERSONALIZATION OF COLLECTIVE ACTIONInformation, Communication & Society, 14
A Hollyhead, DJ Edwards, GD Holt (2012)
The use of virtual learning environment (VLE) and social network site (SNS) hosted forums in higher education: A preliminary examinationIndustry and Higher Education, 26
S. Manca, M. Ranieri (2016)
Is Facebook still a suitable technology-enhanced learning environment? An updated critical review of the literature from 2012 to 2015J. Comput. Assist. Learn., 32
J. Leafman, K. Mathieson, Helen Ewing (2013)
Student Perceptions of Social Presence and Attitudes toward Social Media: Results of a Cross-Sectional StudyThe International Journal of Higher Education, 2
J. Aaen, Christian Dalsgaard (2016)
Student Facebook groups as a third space: between social life and schoolworkLearning, Media and Technology, 41
This study examines student discussion fora in a Master’s programme. Previous student evaluations of the course highlighted the students’ dissatisfaction with the technology chosen for communication and recommended the use of Facebook instead. In this article, we raise the following question: ‘How do various digital discussion fora engage students in academic discussions?’ The collected data material consists of student evaluation reports and dialogues on Facebook and Canvas. The data were gathered from two courses that used Facebook or Canvas as their primary communication technology. In analysing these interactions, we identified several categories: social issues, academic discussions, practical issues, information flow, teacher information, and crossover discussions. The findings, which address the interplay between the social and the material nature of communication in academic discussions, are analysed from a sociomaterial perspective. Our conclusions indicate that the sociomaterial nature of the various discussion fora influences the students’ social presences, which consequently influence the academic discussions.
Technology Knowledge and Learning – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 27, 2018
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.