Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Fellbaum (2000)
WordNet : an electronic lexical databaseLanguage, 76
Rajat Raina, A. Ng, Christopher Manning (2005)
Robust Textual Inference Via Learning and Abductive Reasoning
Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, B. Magnini (2005)
The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge
E. Marsi, E. Krahmer (2005)
Classification of Semantic Relations by Humans and Machines
E. Akhmatova (2005)
Textual Entailment Resolution via Atomic Propositions
Bill Dolan, Ido Dagan (2005)
Proceedings of the ACL Workshop on Empirical Modeling of Semantic Equivalence and Entailment@ACL 2005, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, June 30, 2005
(2002)
C5.0 machine learning software
S Deerwester, S Dumais, G Furna, T Landauer, R Harshman (1990)
Indexing by latent semantic analysisJ Am Soc Inform Sci, 41
Iain Murray, Edward Snelson (2006)
Machine Learning Challenges. Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty, Visual Object Classification, and Recognising Textual Entailment.: First PASCAL Machine Learning Challenges Workshop, Southampton, UK, April 11--13, 2005, Revised Selected Papers.
E. Akhmatova, Diego Aliod (2005)
Recognizing Textual Entailment Via Atomic Propositions
J. Herrera, Anselmo Peñas, M. Verdejo (2005)
Textual Entailment Recognition Based on Dependency Analysis and WordNet
Johan Bos, K. Markert (2005)
Combining Shallow and Deep NLP Methods for Recognizing Textual Entailment
Rodrigo Braz, Roxana Girju, Vasin Punyakanok, D. Roth, Mark Sammons (2005)
An Inference Model for Semantic Entailment in Natural Language
Timothy Chklovski, Patrick Pantel (2004)
VerbOcean: Mining the Web for Fine-Grained Semantic Verb Relations
T. Landauer, S. Dumais (2008)
Latent semantic analysisScholarpedia, 3
E. Newman, W. Doran, N. Stokes, J. Carthy, J. Dunnion (2004)
Comparing Redundancy Removal Techniques for Multi–Document Summarisation
Rajat Raina, A. Haghighi, Christopher Cox, J. Finkel, J. Michels, Kristina Toutanova, Bill MacCartney, M. Marneffe, Christopher Manning, A. Ng (2005)
Robust Textual Inference using Diverse Knowledge Sources
M. Pazienza, M. Pennacchiotti, Fabio Zanzotto (2005)
Textual Entailment as Syntactic Graph Distance: a rule based and a SVM based approach
Daniel Hodges, Christine Clark, Abraham Fowler, D. Moldovan (2005)
Applying COGEX to Recognize Textual Entailment
Courtney Corley, Rada Mihalcea (2005)
Measuring the Semantic Similarity of Texts
Chin-Yew Lin, E. Hovy (2003)
Automatic Evaluation of Summaries Using N-gram Co-occurrence Statistics
Lucy Vanderwende, W. Dolan (2005)
What Syntax Can Contribute in the Entailment Task
Alexander Budanitsky, Graeme Hirst, K. Alcock, Jiang— Conrath (2004)
Semantic distance in WordNet: An experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures
We describe Semantic Equivalence and Textual Entailment Recognition, and outline a system which uses a number of lexical, syntactic and semantic features to classify pairs of sentences as “semantically equivalent”. We describe an experiment to show how syntactic and semantic features improve the performance of an earlier system, which used only lexical features. We also outline some areas for future work.
Artificial Intelligence Review – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 22, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.