Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Steadman, M. McGreevy, J. Morrissey, L. Callahan, P. Robbins, C. Cirincione (1993)
Before and After Hinckley: Evaluating Insanity Defense Reform
P. Heinbecker (1986)
Two years' experience under Utah's mens rea insanity lawBulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law, 14
M. Perlin (1996)
Myths, realities, and the political world: the anthropology of insanity defense attitudes.The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 24 1
G. L. Blau, R. A. Pasewark (1994)
Statutory changes and the insanity defense: Seeking the perfect insane personLaw and Psychology Review, 18
E. Silver, C. Cirincione, H. Steadman (1994)
Demythologizing inaccurate perceptions of the insanity defenseLaw and Human Behavior, 18
H. Zonana, J. Wells, M. Getz, J. Buchanan (1990)
Part I: The NGRI Registry: initial analyses of data collected on Connecticut insanity acquittees.The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 18 2
(1996)
Examining the work of state courts, 1996: Supplement to examining the work of state courts
R. Pasewark, H. McGinley (1985)
Insanity Plea: National Survey of Frequency and SuccessJournal of Psychiatry and Law, 13
J. Janofsky, M. Vandewalle, J. Rappeport (1989)
Defendants pleading insanity: an analysis of outcome.The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 17 2
H. McGinley, R. Pasewark (1989)
National Survey of the Frequency and Success of the Insanity Plea and Alternate PleasJournal of Psychiatry and Law, 17
Following the highly publicized insanity acquittal of John Hinckley in 1982, legislators throughout the country attempted to reform the insanity defense. At the time, policy makers had virtually no empirical evidence with which to guide their reforms. The focus of this research is to determine if more informed policy-making would be possible today? Results show that more states are able to identify cases involving an insanity acquittal than during the 1980's and provide annual data on the number of rate of insanity acquittals. The data collected by many of the states have significant limitation.
Law and Human Behavior – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 30, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.