Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
L. Sterrenberg (1992)
Introduction of genetically engineered organisms into the environment: The Dutch discussion. ms
L. Levidow, J. Tait (1993)
Advice on biotechnology regulation: the remit and composition of Britain's ACREScience and Public Policy, 20
P. Regal (1987)
Models of genetically engineered organisms and their ecological impact.Recombinant DNA technical bulletin, 10 3
R. Grove-White (1991)
RSA Journal
L. Levidow (1991)
Biotechnology at the amber crossingProject Appraisal, 6
E. Millstone, E. Brunner, I. White (1994)
Plagiarism or protecting public health?Nature, 371
J. Tooze (1977)
Genetic engineering in Europe.New scientist, 73 1042
L. Levidow (1991)
Cleaning up on the farmScience As Culture, 2
S. Welin (1993)
Studies in Research Ethics
(1995)
Group of Advisors on the Ethical Implications of Biotechnology to the European Commission
E. Beck-Gernsheim, M. Chalmers (1998)
Life as a Planning Project
I. Gillespie (1994)
Umweltauswirkungen Gentechnisch Veränderter Organismen
(1991)
Promoting the competitive environment for the industrial activities based on biotechnology within the Community
L. Levidow, J. Tait (1991)
Science and Public Policy
M. Cantley (1992)
Biotechnology in public: A review of recent research
D. Stemerding (1993)
Ethics of human genome analysis: European perspectives
William Leiss, U. Beck, M. Ritter, Scott Lash, Brian Wynne (1994)
Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity.Social Forces, 19
R. Straughan (1995)
Ethics, Morality and Crop Biotechnology. 2. Extrinsic Concerns About Consequences 1Outlook on Agriculture, 24
L. Salter, Edwin Levy, W. Leiss (1988)
Mandated Science: Science and Scientists in the Making of Standards
P. Wheale, R. McNally (1993)
Biotechnology policy in Europe: a critical evaluationScience and Public Policy, 20
L. Levidow (1991)
Agricultural biotechnology at the amber crossing: Les Levidow reports on a NABC conference in Sacramento, late May 1991Project appraisal, 6
M. Schwarz, Michael Thompson (1990)
Divided We Stand: Re-Defining Politics, Technology, and Social Choice
M. Hansen (1990)
Biotechnology and milk: Benefit or threat?
L. Levidow (1995)
Perspectives on the environment
M. Mellon (1991)
Biotechnology and the environmental vision
L. Levidow (1995)
Scientizing Security: Agricultural Biotechnology as Clean Surgical StrikeSocial Text
J. Tait, L. Levidow (1992)
Proactive and reactive approaches to regulation: The case of biotechnologyFutures, 24
I. Bartle (1991)
Herbicide-tolerant plants: Weed control with the environment inmind
R.H. Lawrence (1988)
Biotechnology and the food supply
L. Levidow, S. Carr, R. Schomberg, D. Wield (1996)
Bounding the Risk Assessment of a Herbicide Tolerant Crop
L. Levidow, J. Tait (1993)
Advice on biotechnology regulation: The remit and composition of ACREScience and Public Policy, 20
J. Tait, L. Levidow (1992)
Proactive and reactive approaches to risk regulationFutures, 24
A. Millard, Dorothy Nelkin (1985)
The Language of Risk: Conflicting Perspectives on Occupational Health ed. by Dorothy Nelkin (review)Technology and Culture, 28
D. Stemerding, J. Jelsma (1996)
Compensatory ethics for the human genome projectScience As Culture, 5
A. Holland (1990)
The Bio-revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora's Box?
E. Beck-Gernsheim (1996)
Risk, environment and modernity: Towards a new ecology
B. Wynne (1991)
Knowledges in ContextScience, Technology & Human Values, 16
R. Straughan (1995)
Ethics, Morality and Crop Biotechnology. 1. Intrinsic Concerns 1Outlook on Agriculture, 24
(1994)
Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment: Annual Report, no. 1: 1993/94
H. Hobbelink (1991)
Biotechnology and the Future of World Agriculture
R. Balk (1993)
Public Values and Risk Assessment
V. Shiva, Ingunn Moser (1995)
Biopolitics: A Feminist and Ecological Reader on Biotechnology
E. R. Gebhardt (1995)
Opinion of the Committee on Environment, Public Health and Consumer Protection for the Committee on Energy, Research and Technology: Communication on ‘Biotechnology and the White Paper’
A. Dommelen (1996)
Coping with deliberate release: the limits of risk assessment.
G. Johnson, P. Thompson (1991)
Agricultural biotechnology: Issues and choices
D.J. Roy, R.W. Old, B.E. Wynne (1991)
Bioscience-society
L. Levidow, J. Tait (1991)
The greening of biotechnology: GMOs as environment-friendly productsScience and Public Policy, 18
(1992)
Le Citoyen Européen, No. 17: Biotechnologie
(1992)
Genhaz: A system for the critical appraisal of proposals to release genetically modified organisms into the environment
P. Beaumont (1993)
Release of Genetically Modified OrganismsReview of European Community and International Environmental Law, 2
M. Crouch (1991)
The very structure of scientific research mitigates against developing products to help the environment, the poor, and the hungryJournal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 4
(1990)
Council directive on the deliberate release to the environment of genetically modified organismsOfficial Journal of the European Communities, 117
(1990)
Community policy for biotechnology: Priorities and actions
J. Gressel (1992)
Agro-Food-Industry Hi-Tech
D. King (1995)
The limits of bioethicsScience As Culture, 5
H. Breyer (1992)
Committee on Energy, Research and Technology: Draft response to Bangemann report [CEC 1991]
(1992)
Bioethics in Europe
R. Balk (1993)
Agricultural biotechnology: A public conversation about risk
L. Levidow, S. Carr, D. Wield, R. Schomberg (1996)
Regulating agricultural biotechnology in Europe: harmonisation difficulties, opportunities, dilemmasScience and Public Policy, 23
R. Zimdahl (1998)
Rethinking agricultural research rolesAgriculture and Human Values, 15
(1993)
Communication from the Commission concerning Bovine Somatotropin
(1990)
Agro-Industry High-Tech
A. Rip (1986)
Controversies as Informal Technology A ssessmentScience Communication, 8
M. Mantegazzini (1986)
The Environmental Risks from Biotechnology
L. Levidow, J. Tait (1992)
Release of genetically modified organisms: precautionary legislationProject appraisal, 7
(1989)
FoodMatters
P. Regal (1986)
Ecology of biological invasions of North America and Hawaii
B. Wynne (1995)
Managing technology in society
R. v. Schomberg (1993)
Science, politics and morality: Decision-making and scientific uncertainty
J. Macdonald (1989)
Biotechnology and Sustainable Agriculture—Policy Alternatives
M. Mellon (1991)
Agricultural biotechnology at the crossroads
(1985)
The language of risk: Conflicting perspectives on occupational health
R. Grove-White, B. Szerszynski (1992)
Getting behind Environmental EthicsEnvironmental Values, 1
L. Levidow (1992)
Regem 2: The release of genetically-engineered microorganisms
In public debate over agricultural biotechnology, at issue hasbeen its self-proclaimed aim of further industrializingagriculture. Using languages of ’risk‘, critics and proponentshave engaged in an implicit ethics debate on the direction oftechnoscientific development. Critics have challenged thebiotechnological R&D agenda for attributing socio-agronomicproblems to genetic deficiencies, while perpetuating the hazardsof intensive monoculture. They diagnosed ominous links betweentechnological dependency and tangible harm from biotechnologyproducts.
Agriculture and Human Values – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 18, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.