Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W G Lloyd H E Francis (1983)
Predicting heating value from elemental compositionJournal of Coal Quality, 2
C. Yin (2011)
Prediction of higher heating values of biomass from proximate and ultimate analysesFuel, 90
T. Bridgeman, Jenny Jones, A. Williams, D. Waldron (2010)
An investigation of the grindability of two torrefied energy cropsFuel, 89
M. Erol, H. Haykiri-Açma, S. Küçükbayrak (2010)
Calorific value estimation of biomass from their proximate analyses dataRenewable Energy, 35
A. Friedl, E. Padouvas, H. Rotter, K. Varmuza (2005)
Prediction of heating values of biomass fuel from elemental compositionAnalytica Chimica Acta, 544
(1981)
Properties of biomass relevant to gasification
J. Parikh, S. Channiwala, G. Ghosal (2007)
A correlation for calculating elemental composition from proximate analysis of biomass materialsFuel, 86
T. Cordero, F. Márquez, J. Rodríguez-Mirasol, J. Rodriguez (2001)
Predicting heating values of lignocellulosics and carbonaceous materials from proximate analysisFuel, 80
M Graboski (1981)
Properties of biomass relevant to gasification [Fuel gas production]
Puchong Thipkhunthod, V. Meeyoo, P. Rangsunvigit, B. Kitiyanan, K. Siemanond, T. Rirksomboon (2005)
Predicting the heating value of sewage sludges in Thailand from proximate and ultimate analysesFuel, 84
A. Akkaya (2009)
Proximate analysis based multiple regression models for higher heating value estimation of low rank coalsFuel Processing Technology, 90
Mario Baum (2016)
Wood As An Energy Resource
Wei Chen, W. Cheng, K. Lu, Ying-Pin Huang (2011)
An evaluation on improvement of pulverized biomass property for solid fuel through torrefactionApplied Energy, 88
S. Küçükbayrak, B. Dürüs, A. Meriçboyu, Enis Kadiog̈lu (1991)
Estimation of calorific values of Turkish lignitesFuel, 70
S. Channiwala, P. Parikh (2002)
A UNIFIED CORRELATION FOR ESTIMATING HHV OF SOLID, LIQUID AND GASEOUS FUELSFuel, 81
B. Jenkins, J. Ebeling (1985)
CORRELATION OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES OF TERRESTRIAL BIOMASS WITH CONVERSION.
S. Kathiravale, M. Yunus, K. Sopian, A. Samsuddin, R. Rahman (2003)
Modeling the heating value of Municipal Solid WasteFuel, 82
Á. Callejón-Ferre, B. Velázquez‐Martí, J. López-Martínez, F. Manzano-Agugliaro (2011)
Greenhouse crop residues: Energy potential and models for the prediction of their higher heating valueRenewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15
Jianfeng Shen, Shuguang Zhu, Xinzhi Liu, Houlei Zhang, Junjie Tan (2010)
The prediction of elemental composition of biomass based on proximate analysisEnergy Conversion and Management, 51
C. Sheng, J. Azevedo (2005)
Estimating the higher heating value of biomass fuels from basic analysis dataBiomass & Bioenergy, 28
D. Nhuchhen, P. Salam (2012)
Estimation of higher heating value of biomass from proximate analysis: A new approachFuel, 99
A. Demirbaş (1997)
Calculation of higher heating values of biomass fuelsFuel, 76
L. Jiménez, F. Gonzalez (1991)
Study of the physical and chemical properties of lignocellulosic residues with a view to the production of fuelsFuel, 70
D. Medic, M. Darr, Ajay Shah, Benjamin Potter, J. Zimmerman (2012)
Effects of torrefaction process parameters on biomass feedstock upgradingFuel, 91
Abstract The higher heating value of five types of nonwoody biomass and their torrefaction char was predicted and compared with the experimental data obtained in this paper. The correlation proposed in this paper and the ones suggested by previous researches were used for prediction. For prediction using proximate analysis data, the mass fraction of fixed carbon and volatile matter had a strong effect on the higher heating value prediction of torrefaction char of non-woody biomass. The high ash fraction found in torrefied char resulted in a decrease in prediction accuracy. However, the prediction could be improved by taking into account the effect of ash fraction. The correlation developed in this paper gave a better prediction than the ones suggested by previous researches, and had an absolute average error (AAE) of 2.74% and an absolute bias error (ABE) of 0.52%. For prediction using elemental analysis data, the mass fraction of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen had a strong effect on the higher heating value, while no relationship between the higher heating value and mass fractions of nitrogen and sulfur was discovered. The best correlation gave an AAE of 2.28% and an ABE of 1.36%.
"Frontiers in Energy" – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.