Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Hemodynamics of Distal Revascularization-Interval Ligation

Hemodynamics of Distal Revascularization-Interval Ligation Distal revascularization-interval ligation (DRIL) empirically corrects steal after arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation in most cases, but because there is no topologic alteration in anatomy, it is unclear as to why it is effective. To explore this issue, nine symptomatic patients underwent intravascular pressure and flow measurements before and after DRIL following upper arm autologous AVFs. Mean pre-DRIL systolic pressure (mmHg; mean ± SD) in the proximal brachial artery (PROX) was 102 ± 17, while that at the AV anastomosis (AV ANAST) was 47 ± 38 (p < 0.0006). Flow (mL/min) distal to AV ANAST was retrograde with the fistula open (−21 ± 64) but became antegrade (58 ± 29; p < 0.03) with occlusion of the fistula. Following DRIL, pressures at both PROX and AV ANAST sites did not change (104 ± 24 and 51 ± 43, respectively). However, pressure at the point at which the blood flow split to supply the hand or the fistula, now PROX, increased from 47 ± 38 (pre-DRIL AV ANAST) to 104 ± 24 (p < 0.0001). Pressure in the brachial artery distal to the ligature increased to 104 ± 27 (p < 0.0001), flow at this point (to the hand) became antegrade (51 ± 39; p < 0.03), and occlusion of the fistula did not significantly change pressure at this site. We hypothesize that improvement in hand perfusion following DRIL is due to a higher pressure at the point at which the blood flow splits to supply both hand and fistula (pre-DRIL: AV ANAST; post-DRIL: PROX), allowing antegrade flow down the new bypass to the lower pressure forearm. This increased pressure must be due to the increased resistance of the fistula created by interposing the arterial segment between the original AV ANAST and new PROX ANAST. As such, DRIL is schematically equivalent to banding, but resistance is increased in a fashion that is physiologically and empirically acceptable. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of Vascular Surgery Springer Journals

Hemodynamics of Distal Revascularization-Interval Ligation

Download PDF
9 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/hemodynamics-of-distal-revascularization-interval-ligation-pRJFyK25Go

References (14)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by Annals of Vascular Surgery Inc.
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Abdominal Surgery
ISSN
0890-5096
eISSN
1615-5947
DOI
10.1007/s10016-004-0162-y
pmid
15770367
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Distal revascularization-interval ligation (DRIL) empirically corrects steal after arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation in most cases, but because there is no topologic alteration in anatomy, it is unclear as to why it is effective. To explore this issue, nine symptomatic patients underwent intravascular pressure and flow measurements before and after DRIL following upper arm autologous AVFs. Mean pre-DRIL systolic pressure (mmHg; mean ± SD) in the proximal brachial artery (PROX) was 102 ± 17, while that at the AV anastomosis (AV ANAST) was 47 ± 38 (p < 0.0006). Flow (mL/min) distal to AV ANAST was retrograde with the fistula open (−21 ± 64) but became antegrade (58 ± 29; p < 0.03) with occlusion of the fistula. Following DRIL, pressures at both PROX and AV ANAST sites did not change (104 ± 24 and 51 ± 43, respectively). However, pressure at the point at which the blood flow split to supply the hand or the fistula, now PROX, increased from 47 ± 38 (pre-DRIL AV ANAST) to 104 ± 24 (p < 0.0001). Pressure in the brachial artery distal to the ligature increased to 104 ± 27 (p < 0.0001), flow at this point (to the hand) became antegrade (51 ± 39; p < 0.03), and occlusion of the fistula did not significantly change pressure at this site. We hypothesize that improvement in hand perfusion following DRIL is due to a higher pressure at the point at which the blood flow splits to supply both hand and fistula (pre-DRIL: AV ANAST; post-DRIL: PROX), allowing antegrade flow down the new bypass to the lower pressure forearm. This increased pressure must be due to the increased resistance of the fistula created by interposing the arterial segment between the original AV ANAST and new PROX ANAST. As such, DRIL is schematically equivalent to banding, but resistance is increased in a fashion that is physiologically and empirically acceptable.

Journal

Annals of Vascular Surgery – Springer Journals

Published: Mar 14, 2005

There are no references for this article.