Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Goal-setting paradoxes? Trade-offs between working hard and working smart: The United States versus China

Goal-setting paradoxes? Trade-offs between working hard and working smart: The United States... This article proposes a model of the impact of goal difficulty and goal specificity on selling behaviors (selling effort, adaptive selling, and sales planning) and hence sales and behavior performance. The model suggests that goal-setting factors may have opposing effects on different sales behaviors. The empirical findings suggest that goal difficulty positively influences selling effort while negatively influencing adaptive selling behaviors. The results show that goal difficulty and goal specificity both have opposite effects on the two dimensions of working smart: adaptive selling and sales planning. The findings support the need for sales managers to account for the cultural context of the salesperson when determining optimal goal-setting strategies. With data collected from salespeople in the United States and China, the cross-cultural differences regarding the effects of goal-setting factors are also proposed and empirically supported. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Springer Journals

Goal-setting paradoxes? Trade-offs between working hard and working smart: The United States versus China

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/goal-setting-paradoxes-trade-offs-between-working-hard-and-working-zL4TtrKBYq

References (65)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © Academy of Marketing Science 2004
Subject
Economics / Management Science; Business/Management Science, general; Marketing; Social Sciences, general
ISSN
0092-0703
eISSN
1552-7824
DOI
10.1177/0092070303261413
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

This article proposes a model of the impact of goal difficulty and goal specificity on selling behaviors (selling effort, adaptive selling, and sales planning) and hence sales and behavior performance. The model suggests that goal-setting factors may have opposing effects on different sales behaviors. The empirical findings suggest that goal difficulty positively influences selling effort while negatively influencing adaptive selling behaviors. The results show that goal difficulty and goal specificity both have opposite effects on the two dimensions of working smart: adaptive selling and sales planning. The findings support the need for sales managers to account for the cultural context of the salesperson when determining optimal goal-setting strategies. With data collected from salespeople in the United States and China, the cross-cultural differences regarding the effects of goal-setting factors are also proposed and empirically supported.

Journal

Journal of the Academy of Marketing ScienceSpringer Journals

Published: Mar 1, 2004

Keywords: goal setting; goal difficulty; goal specificity; adaptive selling; sales planning; working hard; working smart

There are no references for this article.