Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. H. Berman, C. D. Hafner (1993)
Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on AI and Law
T. Gordon (1993)
The Pleadings GameArtificial Intelligence and Law, 2
Trevor Bench-Capon (2001)
Truth and Consequence: Complementing Logic with Values in Legal ReasoningInformation & Communications Technology Law, 10
Peter Johnson, Dave Mead (1991)
Legislative knowledge base systems for public administration: some practical issues
(1991)
Development, implementation and impact of the TESSEC expert system
D. Berman, C. Hafner (1993)
Representing teleological structure in case-based legal reasoning: the missing link
V. Aleven (1997)
Teaching case-based argumentation through a model and examples
Trevor Bench-Capon (1997)
Argument in Artificial Intelligence and LawArtificial Intelligence and Law, 5
(1989)
A Theory of Legal Argumentation
Ch. Perelman, H. Berman (1980)
Justice, law, and argument
T. J. M. Bench-Capon, M. J. Sergot (1988)
Computer Power and Legal Language
T. J. M. Bench-Capon, G. Sartor (2000)
Proceedings of JURIX 2000
Trevor Bench-Capon, Frans Coenen (1992)
Isomorphism and legal knowledge based systemsArtificial Intelligence and Law, 1
A. Stranieri, John Zeleznikow (1999)
The evaluation of legal knowledge based systems
(1992)
Expert systems - the need for theory
R. N. Moles (1992)
Proceedings of JURIX 1992
Trevor Bench-Capon, G. Sartor (2000)
Using values and theories to resolve disagreement in law 1
C. Perelman, L. Olbrechts-Tyteca (1969)
The New Rhetoric
M. Sergot, F. Sadri, R. Kowalski, F. Kriwaczek, P. Hammond, H. Cory (1986)
The British Nationality Act as a logic programCommun. ACM, 29
H. Prakken, G. Sartor (2004)
Modelling Reasoning with Precedents in a Formal Dialogue GameArtificial Intelligence and Law, 6
Trevor Bench-Capon, M. Sergot (1985)
Towards a rule-based representation of open texture in law
C. van Noortwijk, A. L. W. M. Stubbe (1986)
JURICAS: Erfrecht, een juridisch computeradviessystem
(1986)
JURICAS: Erfrecht, een juridisch computerad
Artificial Intelligence and Law 9: 59–71, 2001. Book Review George C. Christie, The Notion of an Ideal Audience in Legal Argument, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000. 223 pages. ISBN 0-7923-6283-7. 1. Introduction This book contains no mention of computers, let alone Artificial Intelligence. None the less it contains much of relevance to current concerns of Artificial Intelligence and Law, because it deals with the nature of legal argument. The realisation that an understanding of legal argument is a central challenge of AI and Law came very early; Thorne McCarty’s pioneering work on TAXMAN aimed to reconstruct the arguments of the majority and dissenting judgements in a leading tax case. The work of Edwina Rissland, Kevin Ashley, Vincent Aleven and others has explored the ways in which arguments are constructed on the basis of case precedents. Jaap Hage, Henry Prakken, Giovanni Sartor, Bart Verheij, Ron Loui and others have used logical tools and the concept of argument to explain how rational decisions can be made when rules conflict. Tom Gordon, Arno Lodder, myself and others, have modelled the consideration of legal issues as a formal dialogue game in which disputing parties argue their case. These, and other uses of argument,
Artificial Intelligence and Law – Springer Journals
Published: Oct 19, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.