Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Microsatellites in Pineapple

Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Microsatellites in Pineapple Pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merrill) is the second most important tropical fruit in term of international trade. The availability of whole genomic sequences and expressed sequence tags (ESTs) offers an opportunity to identify and characterize microsatellite or simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers in pineapple. A total of 278,245 SSRs and 41,962 SSRs with an overall density of 728.57 SSRs/Mb and 619.37 SSRs/Mb were mined from genomic and ESTs sequences, respectively. 5′-untranslated regions (5′-UTRs) had the greatest amount of SSRs, 3.6–5.2 fold higher SSR density than other regions. For repeat length, 12 bp was the predominant repeat length in both assembled genome and ESTs. Class I SSRs were underrepresented compared with class II SSRs. For motif length, dinucleotide repeats were the most abundant in genomic sequences, whereas trinucleotides were the most common motif in ESTs. Tri- and hexanucleotides of total SSRs were more prevalent in ESTs than in the whole genome. The SSR frequency decreased dramatically as repeat times increased. AT was the most frequent single motif across the entire genome while AG was the most abundant motif in ESTs. Across six examined plant species, the pineapple genome displayed the highest density, substantially more than the second-place cucumber. Annotation and expression analyses were also conducted for genes containing SSRs. This thorough analysis of SSR markers in pineapple provided valuable information on the frequency and distribution of SSRs in the pineapple genome. This genomic resource will expedite genomic research and pineapple improvement. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Tropical Plant Biology Springer Journals

Genome-Wide Comparative Analysis of Microsatellites in Pineapple

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/genome-wide-comparative-analysis-of-microsatellites-in-pineapple-OYOUIXH6Pe
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Springer Science+Business Media New York
Subject
Life Sciences; Plant Sciences; Plant Genetics & Genomics; Plant Breeding/Biotechnology; Plant Ecology; Transgenics
ISSN
1935-9756
eISSN
1935-9764
DOI
10.1007/s12042-016-9163-6
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merrill) is the second most important tropical fruit in term of international trade. The availability of whole genomic sequences and expressed sequence tags (ESTs) offers an opportunity to identify and characterize microsatellite or simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers in pineapple. A total of 278,245 SSRs and 41,962 SSRs with an overall density of 728.57 SSRs/Mb and 619.37 SSRs/Mb were mined from genomic and ESTs sequences, respectively. 5′-untranslated regions (5′-UTRs) had the greatest amount of SSRs, 3.6–5.2 fold higher SSR density than other regions. For repeat length, 12 bp was the predominant repeat length in both assembled genome and ESTs. Class I SSRs were underrepresented compared with class II SSRs. For motif length, dinucleotide repeats were the most abundant in genomic sequences, whereas trinucleotides were the most common motif in ESTs. Tri- and hexanucleotides of total SSRs were more prevalent in ESTs than in the whole genome. The SSR frequency decreased dramatically as repeat times increased. AT was the most frequent single motif across the entire genome while AG was the most abundant motif in ESTs. Across six examined plant species, the pineapple genome displayed the highest density, substantially more than the second-place cucumber. Annotation and expression analyses were also conducted for genes containing SSRs. This thorough analysis of SSR markers in pineapple provided valuable information on the frequency and distribution of SSRs in the pineapple genome. This genomic resource will expedite genomic research and pineapple improvement.

Journal

Tropical Plant BiologySpringer Journals

Published: Mar 22, 2016

References