Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ayhan Gunaydin (2008)
Model theory of fields with multiplicative groups
O. Belegradek, B. Zilber (2008)
The model theory of the field of reals with a subgroup of the unit circleJournal of the London Mathematical Society, 78
B. Poizat (1983)
Paires de structures stablesJournal of Symbolic Logic, 48
A. Berenstein, E. Vassiliev (2012)
Weakly one-based geometric theoriesThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 77
H. Göral (2019)
Tame Expansions of ω-Stable Theories and Definable GroupsNotre Dame J. Formal Log., 60
A. Berenstein, Hyeung-Joon Kim (2016)
Dense codense predicates and the NTP2Mathematical Logic Quarterly, 62
Ayhan Günaydin, Philipp Hieronymi (2010)
Dependent pairsThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 76
A Berenstein, E Vassiliev (2010)
On lovely paris of geometric structuresAnn. Pure Appl. Logic, 161
Alfred Dolich, Chris Miller, C. Steinhorn (2016)
Expansions of o-minimal structures by dense independent setsAnn. Pure Appl. Log., 167
E. Casanovas (2011)
Simple Theories and Hyperimaginaries
Gareth Boxall (2011)
NIP for some pair-like theoriesArchive for Mathematical Logic, 50
A. Pillay, E. Vassiliev (2004)
Imaginaries in beautiful pairsIllinois Journal of Mathematics, 48
L. Dries (1998)
Dense pairs of o-minimal structuresFundamenta Mathematicae, 157
A. Berenstein, Alfred Dolich, A. Onshuus (2011)
The independence property in generalized dense pairs of structuresThe Journal of Symbolic Logic, 76
A. Chernikov, Pierre Simon (2010)
Externally definable sets and dependent pairsIsrael Journal of Mathematics, 194
A. Berenstein, E. Vassiliev (2016)
Geometric structures with a dense independent subsetSelecta Mathematica, 22
(2006)
The fields of real and complex numberswith amultiplicative subgroup
has finitely many solutions
Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations
We study expansions of an algebraically closed field K or a real closed field R with a linearly independent subgroup G of the multiplicative group of the field or the unit circle group S(R)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal}\usepackage{amsmath}\usepackage{wasysym}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{upgreek}\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt}\begin{document}$${\mathbb {S}}(R)$$\end{document}, satisfying a density/codensity condition (in the sense of geometric theories). Since the set G is neither algebraically closed nor algebraically independent, the expansion can be viewed as “intermediate” between the two other types of dense/codense expansions of geometric theories: lovely pairs and H-structures. We show that in both the algebraically closed field and real closed field cases, the resulting theory is near model complete and the expansion preserves many nice model theoretic conditions related to the complexity of definable sets such as stability and NIP.
Archive for Mathematical Logic – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 5, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.