Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Dionisios Sotiropoulos, A. Lampropoulos, G. Tsihrintzis (2008)
MUSIPER: a system for modeling music similarity perception based on objective feature subset selectionUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18
Albert Corbett, John Anderson (2001)
Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudesProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
B. Zimmerman, D. Schunk (2001)
Self-regulated learning and academic achievement : theoretical perspectives
(1990)
Metamemory: A theoretical framework and some new findings
C. Carver, M. Scheier (1990)
Origins and Functions of Positive and Negative Affect: A Control-Process View.Psychological Review, 97
S. Puntambekar, R. Hubscher (2005)
Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed?Educational Psychologist, 40
N. Mattheos, A. Nattestad, Eva Falk-Nilsson, R. Attström (2004)
The interactive examination: assessing students' self‐assessment abilityMedical Education, 38
M. Yudelson, Olga Medvedeva, E. Legowski, Melissa Castine, D. Jukic, R. Crowley (2006)
Mining Student Learning Data to Develop High Level Pedagogic Strategy in a Medical ITS
PR Pintrich, EV Groot (1990)
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroomJournal of Educational Psychology, 82
R. Srivastava, Samantha Sin (1990)
An intelligent tutoring systemNinth Annual International Phoenix Conference on Computers and Communications. 1990 Conference Proceedings
Philip Winne, R. Marx (1982)
Students' and Teachers' Views of Thinking Processes for Classroom LearningThe Elementary School Journal, 82
Tomasz Loboda, Peter Brusilovsky (2006)
WADEIn II: adaptive explanatory visualization for expressions evaluation
N. Dabbagh, A. Kitsantas (2005)
Using Web-based Pedagogical Tools as Scaffolds for Self-regulated LearningInstructional Science, 33
Deborah Butler, Philip Winne (1995)
Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical SynthesisReview of Educational Research, 65
B. White, J. Frederiksen (2005)
A Theoretical Framework and Approach for Fostering Metacognitive DevelopmentEducational Psychologist, 40
R. Azevedo, Amy Witherspoon (2009)
Self-Regulated Learning with Hypermedia
Chong-woo Woo, M. Evens, Reva Freedman, Michael Glass, L. Shim, Yuemei Zhang, Yujian Zhou, J. Michael (2006)
An intelligent tutoring system that generates a natural language dialogue using dynamic multi-level planningArtificial intelligence in medicine, 38 1
R. Crowley, E. Legowski, Olga Medvedeva, Eugene Tseytlin, Ellen Roh, D. Jukic (2007)
Research paper: Evaluation of an Intelligent Tutoring System in Pathology: Effects of External Representation on Performance Gains, Metacognition, and AcceptanceJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 14 2
R. Kulhavy, F. Yekovich, James Dyer (1979)
Feedback and content review in programmed instructionContemporary Educational Psychology, 4
Gilan Saadawi, Eugene Tseytlin, E. Legowski, D. Jukic, Melissa Castine, J. Fine, R. Gormley, R. Crowley (2008)
A natural language intelligent tutoring system for training pathologists: implementation and evaluationAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 13
B. Webber (1989)
Natural Language I
R. Azevedo, A. Hadwin (2005)
Scaffolding Self-regulated Learning and Metacognition – Implications for the Design of Computer-based ScaffoldsInstructional Science, 33
A. Mitrovic, Brent Martin (2002)
Evaluating the Effects of Open Student Models on Learning
A. Graesser, D. McNamara, K. VanLehn (2005)
Scaffolding Deep Comprehension Strategies Through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTARTEducational Psychologist, 40
Alice Corkill (1996)
Individual differences in metacognitionLearning and Individual Differences, 8
T. Nelson (1984)
A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions.Psychological bulletin, 95 1
T Nelson, L Narens (1990)
The psychology of learning and motivation
(2008)
Cognitive psychology of memory
R. Azevedo, Susanne Lajoie (1998)
The Cognitive Basis for the Design of a Mammography Interpretation Tutor 1
Douglas Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A. Graesser (2009)
Handbook of Metacognition in Education
B Reiser (2004)
Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student workJournal of the Learning Sciences, 13
K. VanLehn (2006)
The Behavior of Tutoring SystemsInt. J. Artif. Intell. Educ., 16
Ikseon Choi, Susan Land, A. Turgeon (2005)
Scaffolding Peer-questioning Strategies to Facilitate Metacognition During Online Small Group DiscussionInstructional Science, 33
W. Clancey (1987)
Knowledge-based tutoring: the GUIDON program
M. Sharples, N. Jeffery, John Boulay, B. Teather, D. Teather, G. Boulay (2000)
Structured computer-based training in the interpretation of neuroradiological imagesInternational journal of medical informatics, 60 3
P. Pintrich, E. Groot (1990)
Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance.Journal of Educational Psychology, 82
M. Graber, N. Franklin, Ruthanna Gordon (2005)
Diagnostic error in internal medicine.Archives of internal medicine, 165 13
R. Kulhavy, W. Stock (1989)
Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitudeEducational Psychology Review, 1
K. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, R. Hoffman (2006)
The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance
Philip Winne (2001)
Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing.
John Anderson (1993)
Rules of the Mind
Douglas Hacker, J. Dunlosky, A. Graesser (1998)
Metacognition in educational theory and practice.
E. Wenger (1987)
Artificial Intelligence and Tutoring Systems: Computational and Cognitive Approaches to the Communication of Knowledge
Philip Winne, Allyson Hadwin (1998)
Studying as self-regulated learning.
R. Azevedo, J. Cromley, D. Seibert (2004)
Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? q
M. Yudelson, Olga Medvedeva, R. Crowley (2008)
A multifactor approach to student model evaluationUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18
R. Crowley, Olga Medvedeva (2006)
An intelligent tutoring system for visual classification problem solvingArtificial intelligence in medicine, 36 1
R. Azevedo, Daniel Moos, J. Greene, Fielding Winters, J. Cromley (2008)
Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia?Educational Technology Research and Development, 56
S. Cerri (2012)
Advanced Learning Technologies
MV Yudelson, OP Medvedeva, RS Crowley (2008)
Multifactor approach to student model evaluation in a complex cognitive domainUser Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18
A. Maries, Amruth Kumar (2008)
The Effect of Student Model on Learning2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies
V. Aleven, K. Koedinger (2002)
An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive TutorCogn. Sci., 26
A. Voytovich, R. Rippey, A. Suffredini (1985)
Premature conclusions in diagnostic reasoning.Journal of medical education, 60 4
Philip Winne (1982)
Minimizing the black box problem to enhance the validity of theories about instructional effectsInstructional Science, 11
Susan Land, Barbara Greene (2000)
Project-based learning with the world wide web: A qualitative study of resource integrationEducational Technology Research and Development, 48
B. Zimmerman (2006)
Development and Adaptation of Expertise: The Role of Self-Regulatory Processes and Beliefs.
Philip Winne, A. Hadwin (2008)
The weave of motivation and self-regulated learning.
William Kelemen, P. Frost, C. Weaver (2000)
Individual differences in metacognition: Evidence against a general metacognitive abilityMemory & Cognition, 28
W. Balzer, M. Doherty, Raymond O'Connor (1989)
Effects of cognitive feedback on performance.Psychological Bulletin, 106
Janette Hill, M. Hannafin (1997)
Cognitive strategies and learning from the world wide webEducational Technology Research and Development, 45
Philip Smith, J. Obradovich, S. Guerlain, S. Rudmann, P. Strohm, Jack Smith, J. Svirbley, L. Sachs (1998)
Successful Use of an Expert System to Teach Diagnostic Reasoning for Antibody Identification
Previous studies in our laboratory have shown the benefits of immediate feedback on cognitive performance for pathology residents using an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) in pathology. In this study, we examined the effect of immediate feedback on metacognitive performance, and investigated whether other metacognitive scaffolds will support metacognitive gains when immediate feedback is faded. Twenty-three participants were randomized into intervention and control groups. For both groups, periods working with the ITS under varying conditions were alternated with independent computer-based assessments. On day 1, a within-subjects design was used to evaluate the effect of immediate feedback on cognitive and metacognitive performance. On day 2, a between-subjects design was used to compare the use of other metacognitive scaffolds (intervention group) against no metacognitive scaffolds (control group) on cognitive and metacognitive performance, as immediate feedback was faded. Measurements included learning gains (a measure of cognitive performance), as well as several measures of metacognitive performance, including Goodman–Kruskal gamma correlation (G), bias, and discrimination. For the intervention group, we also computed metacognitive measures during tutoring sessions. Results showed that immediate feedback in an intelligent tutoring system had a statistically significant positive effect on learning gains, G and discrimination. Removal of immediate feedback was associated with decreasing metacognitive performance, and this decline was not prevented when students used a version of the tutoring system that provided other metacognitive scaffolds. Results obtained directly from the ITS suggest that other metacognitive scaffolds do have a positive effect on G and discrimination, as immediate feedback is faded. We conclude that immediate feedback had a positive effect on both metacognitive and cognitive gains in a medical tutoring system. Other metacognitive scaffolds were not sufficient to replace immediate feedback in this study. However, results obtained directly from the tutoring system are not consistent with results obtained from assessments. In order to facilitate transfer to real-world tasks, further research will be needed to determine the optimum methods for supporting metacognition as immediate feedback is faded.
Advances in Health Sciences Education – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 1, 2010
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.