Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(2003)
Interest in agroforestry practices, farmer diversification strategies and government transfers in Missouri’s northeast and southeast In: Sharrow S (ed) Proceedings 8th biennial conference
L. Godsey (2005)
Funding Incentives for Agroforestry in Missouri
P. Korsching, C. Stofferahn, P. Nowak, D. Wagener (1983)
Adopter characteristics and adoption patterns of minimum tillage: Implications for soil conservation programsJournal of Soil and Water Conservation, 38
F. Clearfield, B. Osgood (1986)
SOCIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE ADOPTION OF CONSERVATION PRACTICES
T. Dobbs, J. Pretty (2004)
Agri-Environmental Stewardship Schemes and “Multifunctionality”Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 26
Phillip Johnson, S. Misra, R. Ervin (1997)
A Qualitative Choice Analysis of Factors Influencing Post-CRP Land Use DecisionsJournal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 29
C. Ervin, D. Ervin (1982)
Factors Affecting the Use of Soil Conservation Practices: Hypotheses, Evidence, and Policy ImplicationsLand Economics, 58
R. Skaggs, R. Kirksey, Wilmer Harper (1994)
Determinants And Implication Of Post-Crp Land Use DecisionsJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 19
R. Alig, D. Adams, B. McCarl (1998)
Impacts of Incorporating Land Exchanges Between Forestry and Agriculture in Sector ModelsJournal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 30
(2000)
Agroforestry nomenclature, concepts and practices for the United States
J. Skees, J. Harwood, A. Somwaru, J. Perry (1998)
The Potential for Revenue Insurance Policies in the SouthJournal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 30
J. Cooper, Russ Keim (1996)
Incentive Payments to Encourage Farmer Adoption of Water Quality Protection PracticesDecisionSciRN: Predictive Analytics (Sub-Topic)
R. Hoppe, J. Macdonald (2001)
America's Diverse Family Farms: Assorted Sizes, Types, and SituationsAgricultural Information Bulletins
C. Valdivia, E. Dunn, C. Jetté (1996)
Diversification as a Risk Management Strategy in an Andean Agropastoral CommunityAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78
(1994)
Post-contract CRP land use decisions in South Dakota: Results from a 1993 CRP survey
T. Koontz (2001)
Money Talks?But to Whom? Financial Versus Nonmonetary Motivations in Land Use DecisionsSociety & Natural Resources, 14
D. Pannell (1999)
Social and economic challenges in the development of complex farming systemsAgroforestry Systems, 45
P. Hagan (1996)
Evaluating Determinants of Participation in Voluntary Riparian Buffer Programs: A Case Study of Maryland's Buffer Incentive Program
A. Gray, M. Boehlje, Brent Gloy, Stephen Slinsky (2004)
How U.S. Farm Programs and Crop Revenue Insurance Affect Returns to Farm LandApplied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 26
(2003)
Interest in agroforestry practices, farmer diversification strategies and government transfers in Missouri’s northeast and southeast
A. Raedeke, John Green, S. Hodge, C. Valdivia (2009)
Farmers, the Practice of Farming and the Future of Agroforestry: An Application of Bourdieu's Concepts of Field and HabitusRural Sociology, 68
L. Lynch, Cheryl Brown (2000)
Landowner Decision Making about Riparian BuffersJournal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 32
Subhrendu Pattanayak, D. Mercer, E. Sills, Jui-Chen Yang, K. Cassingham (2003)
Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studiesAgroforestry Systems, 57
B. Cutter, A. Rahmadi, W. Kurtz, S. Hodge (1999)
State policies for agroforestry in the United StatesAgroforestry Systems, 46
(1997)
Can the EPA’s “319
(2004)
An agroforestry for every reason: adoption potential in changing rural Pennsylvania. In: Book of abstracts 1st world congress of agroforestry
B. Gardner (2000)
Economic Growth and Low Incomes in AgricultureAmerican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82
T. Reardon, C. Delgado, P. Matlon (1991)
Determinants and effects of income diversification amongst farm households in Burkina FasoJournal of Development Studies, 28
J. Lassoie, L. Buck, N. Thevathasan, P. Nair, H. Garrett, E. Holzmueller, A. Gillespie, W. Walter, R. Udawatta, P. Schultz, J. Davis (2006)
North American Agroforestry: An Integrated Science and Practice
(1981)
Soil Survey of Cape Girardeau, Mississippi and Scott Counties, Missouri
L. Buck (1995)
Agroforestry policy issues and research directions in the US and less developed countries: insights and challenges from recent experienceAgroforestry Systems, 30
(2000)
The economic and social value of floodplain agroforestry for rural development: a baseline economic and social
(1997)
Can the EPA’s ‘‘319’’ program help launch your agroforestry project
M. Soule, A. Tegene, K. Wiebe (2000)
Land Tenure and the Adoption of Conservation PracticesEconometric Modeling: Agriculture
S. Workman, M. Bannister, P. Nair (2003)
Agroforestry potential in the southeastern United States: perceptions of landowners and extension professionalsAgroforestry Systems, 59
Murat Işık, Wanhong Yang (2004)
An Analysis of the Effects of Uncertainty and Irreversibility on Farmer Participation in the Conservation Reserve ProgramJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 29
K. Konyar, C. Osborn (1990)
A National-Level Economic Analysis of Conservation Reserve Program Participation: A Discrete Choice ApproachJournal of agricultural economics research, 42
G. Boody, B. Vondracek, D. Andow, M. Krinke, J. Westra, J. Zimmerman, P. Welle (2005)
Multifunctional Agriculture in the United States, 55
(2000)
The economic and social value of floodplain agroforestry for rural development : a baseline economic and social profile of producers in northeast and southeast Missouri
S. Scherr (1995)
Economic factors in farmer adoption of agroforestry: Patterns observed in Western KenyaWorld Development, 23
S. David (1997)
Household economy and traditional agroforestry systems in western KenyaAgriculture and Human Values, 14
(2004)
Adoption of riparian forest buffers on private lands: factors affecting their use in two Nebraska, USA Watersheds. In: Book of abstracts 1st world congress of agroforestry
M. Shucksmith (1993)
FARM HOUSEHOLD BEHAVIOUR AND THE TRANSITION TO POST-PRODUCTIVISMJournal of Agricultural Economics, 44
F. Mary, C. Dupraz, E. Delannoy, F. Liagre (1998)
Incorporating agroforestry practices in the management of walnut plantations in Dauphiné, France: an analysis of farmers’ motivationsAgroforestry Systems, 43
M. Etienne, H. Rapey (2004)
Simulating integration of agroforestry into livestock farmers‘ projects in FranceAgroforestry Systems, 43
(1981)
Adoption behavior in family farm systems: an Iowa Study
(2002)
An Overview of Rural Missouri 2002: The Demographic, Economic, Cultural and Geographic Context for Missouri Rural Social Science
TL Dobbs, JN Pretty (2004)
Agri-environmental stewardship schemes and “multifunctionality”Rev Agric Econ, 26
R. Knutson, Edward Smith, David Anderson, J. Richardson (1998)
Southern Farmers' Exposure to Income Risk Under the 1996 Farm BillJournal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 30
J. Raintree (1983)
Strategies for enhancing the adoptability of agroforestry innovationsAgroforestry Systems, 1
(1981)
History of Lewis, Clark, Knox, and Scotland Counties, Missouri
S. Matthews, S. Pease, A. Gordon, P. Williams (1993)
Landowner perceptions and the adoption of agroforestry practices in southern Ontario, CanadaAgroforestry Systems, 21
F. Ellis (1998)
Household strategies and rural livelihood diversificationJournal of Development Studies, 35
A. Mishra, C. Sandretto (2002)
Stability of Farm Income and the Role of Nonfarm Income in U.S. AgricultureApplied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 24
Interest in the incorporation of riparian buffers and forest farming were modeled following agricultural conservation and agroforestry adoption studies. Attitudes, individual characteristics, economic diversity of landowners’ household portfolio, and physical and ecological conditions were explanatory variables in Logit regression models of interest. Habitus and field , the values and institutions of farm operators, were included in the framework. Knowledge of the practice, perceived problems with the environment and attitude/ habitus variables had a positive effect on the probability of being interested in riparian buffers. Knowledge of the practice was the most important factor in explaining interest in the case of forest farming, followed by attitudes about trees and concern for future generations, both habitus variables. Field variables like CRP payments representing familiarity with government programs that support conservation, had no significant effect on interest in riparian buffers. Older farmers were less interested in both practices, consistent with other findings. Existing economic diversification of the household portfolio had no effect on the probability of being interested in either practice.
Agroforestry Systems – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 1, 2009
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.