Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Ali, J. Shahu, K. Sharma (2012)
Model tests on geosynthetic-reinforced stone columns: a comparative studyGeosynthetics International, 19
S. Lajevardi, S. Enami, H. Shamsi, M. Hamidi (2019)
Experimental Study of Single and Groups of Stone Columns Encased by Geotextile
R. Bhatia, Arvind Kumar (2019)
Model tests on geosynthetic-encased construction concrete debris column in fly ash fillInnovative Infrastructure Solutions, 4
D. Wood, W. Hu, D. Nash (2000)
Group effects in stone column foundations: model testsGeotechnique, 50
(2011)
Standard test method for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method
(1986)
Improving of the bearing capacity of weak hydraulic fills by means of geotextiles
R. Barksdale (1980)
Development of methodology for the design and construction of stone columns
(2006)
Standard test methods for specific gravity of soil solids by water pycnometer
(2019)
Experimental and numerical studies on loadcarrying capacity of single floating aggregate piers reinforced with vertical steel bars
(1982)
Recent development in the use and analysis of granular piles
Javad Afshar, M. Ghazavi (2014)
Experimental Studies on Bearing Capacity of Geosynthetic Reinforced Stone ColumnsArabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 39
(2010)
standard test methods for laboratory determination of water (moisture) content of soil and rock by mass
(2000)
Nash DFT (2000) Group effects in stone column foundations: model tests. Geotechnique 50(6):689–698
(2007)
Comparative study on the behavior of encased stone column and conventional stone column. Soils Found 47(5):873–885
M. Rezaei, S. Lajevardi, H. Saba, A. Ghalandarzadeh, E. Zeighami (2019)
Laboratory Study on Single Stone Columns Reinforced with Steel Bars and DiscsInternational Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 5
J. Castro (2017)
Groups of encased stone columns: Influence of column length and arrangementGeotextiles and Geomembranes, 45
Jianfeng Chen, Xing-Tao Wang, J. Xue, Yu Zeng, Shou-Zhong Feng (2018)
Uniaxial compression behavior of geotextile encased stone columnsGeotextiles and Geomembranes
(1994)
Soil improvement. Panel report on stone columns
G. Kumar, M. Samanta (2020)
Experimental evaluation of stress concentration ratio of soft soil reinforced with stone columnInnovative Infrastructure Solutions, 5
M. Ghazavi, J. Afshar (2013)
Bearing capacity of geosynthetic encased stone columnsGeotextiles and Geomembranes, 38
S. Nayak, R. Shivashankar, M. Babu (2011)
Performance of stone columns with circumferential nails, 164
S. Prasad, P. Satyanarayana (2016)
Improvement of Soft Soil Performance using Stone Columns Improved with Circular Geogrid DiscsIndian journal of science and technology, 9
(1989)
Similitude for shaking table tests on soil-structure fluid models in 1 g gravitational field. Soil Found 29(1):105–118
(2006)
Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table
(2006)
Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil
Shivani Verma, V. Kumar, Akash Priyadarshee (2018)
An experimental test study on ring footing resting on clay bed reinforced by stone columnInnovative Infrastructure Solutions, 3
M. Hamidi, S. Lajevardi (2018)
Experimental Study on the Load-Carrying Capacity of Single Stone ColumnsInternational Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 4
A. Ambily, Shailesh Gandhi (2007)
Behavior of Stone Columns Based on Experimental and FEM AnalysisJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133
S. Murugesan, K. Rajagopal (2007)
Model tests on geosynthetic-encased stone columnsGeosynthetics International, 14
T. Ayadat, A. Hanna, A. Hamitouche (2008)
Soil improvement by internally reinforced stone columns, 161
井合 進 (1989)
Similitude for shaking table tests on soil-structure-fluid model in 1g gravitational field., 29
(2017)
Samadhiya NK (2017) Performance of geosyntheticreinforced granular piles in soft clays: model tests and numerical analysis
(2006)
Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system)
M. Hasan, N. Samadhiya (2017)
Performance of geosynthetic-reinforced granular piles in soft clays: Model tests and numerical analysisComputers and Geotechnics, 87
DashSujit Kumar, B. Chandra (2013)
Influence of geosynthetic encasement on the performance of stone columns floating in soft clayCanadian Geotechnical Journal, 50
S. Iai (1989)
SIMILITUDE FOR SHAKING TABLE TESTS ON SOIL-STRUCTURE-FLUID MODEL IN 1g GRAVITATIONAL FIELDSoils and Foundations, 29
(1970)
Mechanical improvement of soils below ground surfaces
(2003)
Design and construction for ground improvement-Guidelines
J. Shahu, Y. Reddy (2011)
Clayey Soil Reinforced with Stone Column Group: Model Tests and AnalysesJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 137
P. Debnath, A. Dey (2017)
Bearing capacity of geogrid reinforced sand over encased stone columns in soft clayGeotextiles and Geomembranes, 45
J. Gniel, A. Bouazza (2009)
Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columnsGeotextiles and Geomembranes, 27
D. Alexiew, D. Brokemper, S. Lothspeich (2005)
Geotextile Encased Columns (GEC): Load Capacity, Geotextile Selection and Pre-Design Graphs
(1983)
Office of Engineering and Highway Operations Research and Development
K. Ali, J. Shahu, K. Sharma (2014)
Model tests on single and groups of stone columns with different geosynthetic reinforcement arrangementGeosynthetics International, 21
S. Malarvizhi, Ilamparuthi (2007)
COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE BEHAVIOR OF ENCASED STONE COLUMN AND CONVENTIONAL STONE COLUMNSoils and Foundations, 47
(2007)
Model tests on geosyntheticencased stone columns
R. Sharma, B. Kumar, G. Nagendra (2004)
Compressive load response of granular piles reinforced with geogridsCanadian Geotechnical Journal, 41
(2005)
Standard test methods for liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index of soils
(2006)
Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density
(1979)
The composera method to improve the characteristics of soft clays by inclusion of large diameter sand columns
S. Murugesan, K. Rajagopal (2010)
Studies on the Behavior of Single and Group of Geosynthetic Encased Stone ColumnsJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136
M. Madhav, P. Vitkar (1978)
STRIP FOOTING ON WEAK CLAY STABILIZED WITH A GRANULAR TRENCH OR PILECanadian Geotechnical Journal, 15
A. Vesić (1972)
Expansion of Cavities in Infinite Soil MassJournal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 98
M. Almeida, I. Hosseinpour, Mario Riccio, D. Alexiew (2015)
Behavior of Geotextile-Encased Granular Columns Supporting Test Embankment on Soft DepositJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 141
M. Ghazavi, A. Yamchi, J. Afshar (2018)
Bearing capacity of horizontally layered geosynthetic reinforced stone columnsGeotextiles and Geomembranes
(2003)
Standard test method for direct shear test of soils under consolidated drained conditions
S. Lajevardi, H. Shamsi, M. Hamidi, S. Enami (2018)
Numerical and Experimental Studies on Single Stone ColumnsSoil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 55
Stone columns are used as a technique for improving the strength and enhancing the bearing capacity of soft soils. Due to the low confinement of the soil typically surrounding the stone columns, reinforcement materials like geotextile are needed to improve such weakness. Although the technique is now well established, little research has been undertaken on the use of various positions of the reinforcement materials. In this paper, some small-scale laboratory tests were performed on reinforced floating stone columns with diameters of 80 mm and 100 mm and the length of 400 mm and 500 mm, respectively, to study the influence of various positions of geotextile. They were included vertical encasement stone columns, horizontal reinforcement stone columns and combined vertical–horizontal encasement stone columns. The impacts of the different diameters of the columns, the length of the reinforcement and the spaces of the reinforcement have been studied. Based on the results, by increasing the diameter of the vertical encasement stone column, the benefit of encasement decreases, while in horizontal and vertical–horizontal encasement stone column, the performance of the reinforcement increases. Moreover, the load-carrying capacity of combined vertical–horizontal encasement stone columns increases considerably in comparison with the other types.
Innovative Infrastructure Solutions – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 14, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.