Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
W. Edwards (1975)
Cognitive Processes and the Assessment of Subjective Probability Distributions: CommentJournal of the American Statistical Association, 70
R. Hogarth (1975)
Cognitive Processes and the Assessment of Subjective Probability DistributionsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 70
J. Russo, Gene Krieser, Sally Miyashita (1975)
An Effective Display of Unit Price InformationJournal of Marketing, 39
J. Arndt (1977)
Laboratory studies and the laboratory paradigm of man: Confessions of an uneasy consumer researcherZeitschrift für Verbraucherpolitik, 1
R. Olshavsky, John Miller (1972)
Consumer Expectations, Product Performance, and Perceived Product QualityJournal of Marketing Research, 9
Alan Sawyer (1975)
Demand Artifacts in Laboratory Experiments in Consumer ResearchJournal of Consumer Research, 1
A. Stokes (1975)
Comparison theorems, numerical integration, and satellite orbitsMechanics Research Communications, 2
J. Vane (1968)
The Vane kindergarten test.Journal of clinical psychology, 24 2
M. Venkatesan, R. Holloway (1971)
An introduction to marketing experimentation : methods, applications, and problems
J. Merrill Carlsmith (1968)
Experimentation in Social Psychology
J. Vane (1968)
, “The Vane Kindergarten Test,”Journal of Clinical Psychology, Monograph Supplement Number 24
G. Day (1976)
Assessing the Effects of Information Disclosure RequirementsJournal of Marketing, 40
J. Bettman, N. Capon, R. Lutz (1975)
Information Processing in Attitude Formation and ChangeCommunication Research, 2
R. Rosenthal (1968)
Experimenter effects in behavioral research
Donald Brightman, B. Raymond (1975)
The Effects of Task Ambiguity and Expectancy Control Groups on the Experimenter Bias Effect.The Journal of social psychology, 96 2
John A. Miller Richard W. Olshavsky (1972)
Consumer Expectations, Product Performance, and Perceived QualityJournal of Marketing Research, 9
Abstract In any experiment, control over all possible variables affecting the response is rarely, if ever, possible. Even in a laboratory setting it is difficult to control all variables which might conceivably affect the outcome. This study identifies three variables—task relevancy, tool availability, and time allocation as variables which have potentially reactive effects in laboratory experiments.
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 1, 1980
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.