Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation

Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation Artif Intell Law https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9226-0 BOOK REVIEW Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation Springer, 2017, 2nd edn, pp. 363 T. J. M. Bench-Capon Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Argumentation has been at the heart of the AI and Law enterprise since its very beginning. One of the earliest AI and Law programs, Taxman (McCarty 1976), attempted to model the majority and minority arguments in a leading case, Eisner v Macomber, computationally. Since then many AI and Law researchers have explored legal argumentation, using both formal techniques (see Prakken and Sartor (2015) for a survey) and more empirical techniques (see Bench-Capon 2017). Equally long standing is the investigation of legal argumentation from the perspective of argumentation theory , in particular that of the pragma-dialectics group at the University of Amsterdam, from which this book originates. Eveline Feteris has been a long standing member (since 1986) of this group, and has published extensively on legal argumentation including (Feteris 1994, 1996, 1997, 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008) and (Feteris 2016). The book under review is a completely updated, revised and extended second edition: the first edition was published in 1999, so updating was very much required. Given this commonality http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Artificial Intelligence and Law Springer Journals

Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation

Artificial Intelligence and Law , Volume 26 (3) – Mar 31, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/eveline-t-feteris-fundamentals-of-legal-argumentation-0sgV5xikeY
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 by Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature
Subject
Computer Science; Artificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics); International IT and Media Law, Intellectual Property Law; Philosophy of Law; Legal Aspects of Computing; Information Storage and Retrieval
ISSN
0924-8463
eISSN
1572-8382
DOI
10.1007/s10506-018-9226-0
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Artif Intell Law https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-018-9226-0 BOOK REVIEW Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation Springer, 2017, 2nd edn, pp. 363 T. J. M. Bench-Capon Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018 Argumentation has been at the heart of the AI and Law enterprise since its very beginning. One of the earliest AI and Law programs, Taxman (McCarty 1976), attempted to model the majority and minority arguments in a leading case, Eisner v Macomber, computationally. Since then many AI and Law researchers have explored legal argumentation, using both formal techniques (see Prakken and Sartor (2015) for a survey) and more empirical techniques (see Bench-Capon 2017). Equally long standing is the investigation of legal argumentation from the perspective of argumentation theory , in particular that of the pragma-dialectics group at the University of Amsterdam, from which this book originates. Eveline Feteris has been a long standing member (since 1986) of this group, and has published extensively on legal argumentation including (Feteris 1994, 1996, 1997, 2000, 2002, 2005, 2008) and (Feteris 2016). The book under review is a completely updated, revised and extended second edition: the first edition was published in 1999, so updating was very much required. Given this commonality

Journal

Artificial Intelligence and LawSpringer Journals

Published: Mar 31, 2018

References