Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Evaluation of the correlation of automated and manual results of complete blood count in oncologic patients

Evaluation of the correlation of automated and manual results of complete blood count in... The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of Sysmex XS-800i analyzer and compare its correlation with standard manual method in oncologic patients. The complete blood count (CBC) with differential leukocyte count is one of the most frequently requested hematologic tests. In oncologic patients, it is more important because primary diagnosis and treatment follow-up are depending on CBC results. Automated hematology analyzers are designed to perform CBC with acceptable precision and accuracy, but manual slide examination still is needed to complement the analyzer results. One thousand CBC samples of oncologic patients analyzed by Sysmex XS-800i analyzer and the corresponding slides were examined independently by a skilled hematology technician and a pathologist. Their results analyzed for finding the degree of correlation between them. Our instrument showed excellent performance with a correlation coefficient of >0.91 for platelet and leukocyte differential count (except for basophil with r = 0.592). Sensitivity and specificity of identifying abnormal cells was 82.7 and 92 %, respectively. The Sysmex XS-800i hematology analyzer results are as reliable as the standard manual method; however, manual microscopic blood examination should be used to complete the uncompleted results, to validate analyzer flags, and for counting the cells with a flag. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Comparative Clinical Pathology Springer Journals

Evaluation of the correlation of automated and manual results of complete blood count in oncologic patients

Download PDF
4 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/evaluation-of-the-correlation-of-automated-and-manual-results-of-0OM7gjpsdg
Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Springer-Verlag London
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Pathology; Hematology; Oncology
eISSN
1618-565X
DOI
10.1007/s00580-016-2319-9
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of Sysmex XS-800i analyzer and compare its correlation with standard manual method in oncologic patients. The complete blood count (CBC) with differential leukocyte count is one of the most frequently requested hematologic tests. In oncologic patients, it is more important because primary diagnosis and treatment follow-up are depending on CBC results. Automated hematology analyzers are designed to perform CBC with acceptable precision and accuracy, but manual slide examination still is needed to complement the analyzer results. One thousand CBC samples of oncologic patients analyzed by Sysmex XS-800i analyzer and the corresponding slides were examined independently by a skilled hematology technician and a pathologist. Their results analyzed for finding the degree of correlation between them. Our instrument showed excellent performance with a correlation coefficient of >0.91 for platelet and leukocyte differential count (except for basophil with r = 0.592). Sensitivity and specificity of identifying abnormal cells was 82.7 and 92 %, respectively. The Sysmex XS-800i hematology analyzer results are as reliable as the standard manual method; however, manual microscopic blood examination should be used to complete the uncompleted results, to validate analyzer flags, and for counting the cells with a flag.

Journal

Comparative Clinical Pathology – Springer Journals

Published: Aug 13, 2016

References

  • The international consensus group for hematology review: suggested criteria for action following automated CBC and WBC differential analysis
    Barnes, PW; McFadden, SL; Machin, SJ; Simson, E
  • Performance evaluation of the Sysmex XS-1000i automated haematology analyser
    Ghys, T; Malfait, R; Vanden-Bossche, J
  • Purpose and criteria for blood smear scan, blood smear examination, and blood smear review
    Gulati, G; Song, J; Dulau-Florea, A; Gong, J
  • Differential leukocyte count: manual or automated, what should it be?
    Hyun, BH; Gulati, GL; Ashton, JK
  • Comparison of haematological parameters determined by the Sysmex KX-2IN automated haematology analyzer and the manual counts
    Ike, SO; Nubila, T; Ukaejiofo, EO; Nubila, IN; Shu, EN; Ezema, I
  • White blood cell differential counts in severely leukopenic samples: a comparative analysis of different solutions available in modern laboratory hematology
    Kim, AH; Lee, W; Kim, M; Kim, Y; Han, K
  • Accurate automated leucocyte differential counts despite profound leucopenia
    Kinsey, SE; Watts, MJ
  • Performance evaluation of the Sysmex XT-2000i automated hematology analyzer
    Langford, K; Luchtman-Jones, L; Miller, R; Walck, D
  • Comparison of automated differential blood cell counts from Abbott sapphire, Siemens Advia 120, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, and Sysmex XE-2100 in normal and pathologic samples
    Meintker, L; Ringwald, J; Rauh, M; Krause, SW
  • Laboratory productivity and the rate of manual peripheral blood smear review: a college of American pathologists Q-probes study of 95, 141 complete blood count determinations performed in 263 institutions
    Novis, DA; Walsh, M; Wilkinson, D; St-Louis, M; Ben-Ezra, J
  • Validation and optimization of criteria for manual smear review following automated blood cell analysis in a large university hospital
    Pratumvinit, B; Wongkrajang, P; Reesukumal, K; Klinbua, C; Niamjoy, P
  • The new hematology analyzer Sysmex XE-2100: performance evaluation of a novel white blood cell differential technology
    Ruzicka, K; Veitl, M; Thalhammer-Scherrer, R; Schwarzinger, I