Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
JP Brennan, GM Murray (1998)
Economic Importance of Wheat Diseases in Australia
G. Murray, John Brown (1987)
The incidence and relative importance of wheat diseases in AustraliaAustralasian Plant Pathology, 16
H. Wallwork (2000)
Cereal leaf and stem diseases.
W. James (1969)
A survey of foliar diseases of spring barley in England and Wales in 1967Annals of Applied Biology, 63
J. Brennan, G. Murray (1988)
Australian wheat diseases - assessing their economic importance.Agricultural Science, 1
G. Murray, J. Brennan (2009)
Estimating disease losses to the Australian wheat industryAustralasian Plant Pathology, 38
H. Wallwork (2000)
Cereal root and crown diseases.
K. Jayasena, R. Loughman, J. Majewski (2002)
Evaluation of fungicides in control of spot-type net blotch on barleyCrop Protection, 21
W. James (1974)
ASSESSMENT OF PLANT DISEASES AND LOSSESAnnual Review of Phytopathology, 12
J. Brown (1985)
Pathogenic variation among isolates of Rhynchosporium secalis from cultivated barley growing in Victoria, AustraliaEuphytica, 34
T. Khan (1986)
Effects of fungicide treatments on scald (Rhynchosporium secalis (Oud.) J. Davis) infection and yield of barley in Western Australia.Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 26
JF Brown (1975)
Australian Field Crops, Volume I: Wheat and Other Temperate Cereals
J. Brown, A. Lazenby, E. Matheson (1975)
Diseases of wheat - their incidence and control.
J. Zadoks, R. Schein (1979)
Epidemiology and plant disease management
The incidence, severity and yield loss caused by 40 pathogens associated with 41 diseases of barley were assessed from a survey of 15 barley pathologists covering the winter cereal growing areas of Australia. The survey provided data on the frequency of years that each pathogen developed to its maximum extent, the proportion of the crop then affected in each growing area, and the yield loss that resulted in the affected crops with and without current control measures. These data were combined with crop production and grain quality data to estimate the value of the losses aggregated to the Northern, Southern and Western production regions. Pathogens were estimated to cause a current average loss of $252 × 106/year or 19.6% of the average annual value of the barley crop in the decade 1998-99 to 2007–08. Nationally, the three most important pathogens are Pyrenophora teres f. maculata, Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei and Heterodera avenae with current average annual losses of $43 × 106, $39 × 106 and $26 × 106, respectively. If current controls were not used, losses would be far higher with potential average annual losses from the three most important pathogens, P. teres f. maculata, H. avenae and P. teres f. teres, being $192 × 106, $153 × 106 and $117 × 106, respectively. The average value of control practices exceeded $50 × 106/year for nine pathogens. Cultural methods (rotation, field preparation) were the only controls used for 14 pathogens and contributed more than 50% of the control for a further 13 pathogens. Breeding and the use of resistant cultivars contributed more than 50% of control for five pathogens and pesticides for four pathogens. The relative importance of pathogens varied between regions and zones.
Australasian Plant Pathology – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 18, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.