Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Erratum to: The Organizational Account of Function is an Etiological Account of Function

Erratum to: The Organizational Account of Function is an Etiological Account of Function Acta Biotheor (2016) 64:119–120 DOI 10.1007/s10441-015-9267-7 ERRATUM Erratum to: The Organizational Account of Function is an Etiological Account of Function 1 2 Marc Artiga Manolo Mart´ınez Published online: 24 July 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 Erratum to: Acta Biotheor DOI 10.1007/s10441-015-9256-x In the original publication of the article, we have some names of definitions that should go in bold letters. Furthermore, the whole definition should be indented. The correct version is as follows: Page 2 The Etiology of Wings: The actual existence of B’s wings is explained by wings having helped B’s ancestors to fly in the (comparatively recent) past. Etiological Function: A trait T has the function of producing an effect of type E in an organism O if and only the following fact contributes, in the relevant way, to a causal explanation that T is in O: T has contributed to the fitness of O’s ancestors (in the comparatively recent past) by producing effects of type E. Page 5 Organizational Function: A trait type T has a function if, and only if, it is subject to organizational closure C in a differentiated self-maintaining system S. The online version of the original article can be found under http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Acta Biotheoretica Springer Journals

Erratum to: The Organizational Account of Function is an Etiological Account of Function

Acta Biotheoretica , Volume 64 (2) – Jul 24, 2015

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/erratum-to-the-organizational-account-of-function-is-an-etiological-WOu9l6VDnD

References (0)

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
Subject
Philosophy; Philosophy of Biology; Evolutionary Biology
ISSN
0001-5342
eISSN
1572-8358
DOI
10.1007/s10441-015-9267-7
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Acta Biotheor (2016) 64:119–120 DOI 10.1007/s10441-015-9267-7 ERRATUM Erratum to: The Organizational Account of Function is an Etiological Account of Function 1 2 Marc Artiga Manolo Mart´ınez Published online: 24 July 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015 Erratum to: Acta Biotheor DOI 10.1007/s10441-015-9256-x In the original publication of the article, we have some names of definitions that should go in bold letters. Furthermore, the whole definition should be indented. The correct version is as follows: Page 2 The Etiology of Wings: The actual existence of B’s wings is explained by wings having helped B’s ancestors to fly in the (comparatively recent) past. Etiological Function: A trait T has the function of producing an effect of type E in an organism O if and only the following fact contributes, in the relevant way, to a causal explanation that T is in O: T has contributed to the fitness of O’s ancestors (in the comparatively recent past) by producing effects of type E. Page 5 Organizational Function: A trait type T has a function if, and only if, it is subject to organizational closure C in a differentiated self-maintaining system S. The online version of the original article can be found under

Journal

Acta BiotheoreticaSpringer Journals

Published: Jul 24, 2015

There are no references for this article.